Plaintiff sought to implead the Telangana State Housing Board as an additional defendant in a pending suit and challenged the trial court's refusal via revision. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a properly constituted application under Order I Rule 10 CPC; the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn without any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3985 OF 2024
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to set aside the impguned order dated 0311012024 passed in lA.No.701 of 2023 in OS.No.345 ol 2014 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice.
Between
Mrs. C. Madhavi, W/o. C. Balaraj, Aged- 46 years, Occ- Govt. Em p loyee, R/o. Flat No.502, Nithish Jayabheri Samudayam Apartments in H. No.1-98/6/J, Jubilee Enclave, Madhapur, Hyderabad
Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in OS.No.345 of 2014 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice and pass
Counsel for the Petitione(s).SRl. B ARJUN
Counsel ficr the Respondents: None appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL CruIL REVISION PETITION o.3985 of 2024
ORDER:
Sri B.Arjun, learnedcounselfor the petitionerseeks to withdraw this petitionwith liberty to frle a properlyconstituted application underOrder1 Rule1O of CivilProcedureCode, 1908' 2. The prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the CivilRevisionPetition is dismissedas withdrawn with libertyprayed for. It is madeclear that this Court has not expressedany opinion on merits and on the tenabilityof such application.No costs.
Interlocutory applications,ifany pending,shallalso
stand closed.
Sd,- MOHD.ISMAIL ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
\
,/TRUECOPY//
I ',r\
SECTIONOFFICER
to,.,. ,n" ,r Additionarchief Judge, city civircourt at Hyderabad.(withrecords if any)
One CC toSRl.B Arjun' Advocate [OPUCI
)y
t
I
HIGH COURT
I
DATED:1311212024
ORDER
t{ b S rA
t)o O E JAt'l 2U6 za
.I
*
DF p ATC
CRP.No.3985 ot 2024
CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
I
/+ l6
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs. C. Madhavi
Smt. M. Sakku Bai
Sri M. Jagadeshwar
Sri M. Chandra Sekhar
Smt. D. Swaroopa Rani
Smt. P. Jayaroopa Rani
Sujoy Paul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
