Kolagani Lavanya v. Gopagoni Sugunakar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Art. 226 and S. 151 CPC as infructuous, holding the cause of action does not survive for adjudication.
The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Art. 226 and S. 151 CPC as infructuous, holding the cause of action does not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-l
132521
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLINANDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 3450 ot 2024
Petition under Article 227 ol the Constitutionof lndia seekinga directionto decidethe l.A.No.6O8 ot 2024 in CMANo.09 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the Hon ble Principal District Judge, Jangaon.
Between:
Kolagani Lavanya, Wo Srinivas, Age.47 years, Occ Business, R/o 3-8-1, Station Road, Jangaon Town andDistrict.
...Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
ANO
Gopagoni S ugunakar, S/o Murali, Age. 42years, Occ. BusinessR/oNarmetta Village and Mandal, Jangaon District.
...RespondenURespondenURespondent
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the Highcourlmay be pleasedto direct the lower appellatecourti.e., Hon',blePrincipal District Judge, Jangaon to decide the lA.No.6o8of 2024in cMA.No.09of 2024 forthwith without waiting for the records from the lower court.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SriC.M.R.Velu
Counsel for the Respondent: SriAshokReddyKanathala
The Court made the following:ORDER
I t
HON'BLEMRSJUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA c IL EVIsro P TI NNo.34ooF204
oRDER:
Heard SriC.M.R'Velu, learned counsel appearing on behalfof the Petitioner'
the learned 4. Bringing thesaid submission of counsel aPPearingon behalf of the petitioner on re.cord, the civil revisionpetition is dismissed as
I
2
1
infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs,
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if
any, pending in the Civil Revision Petition shall also stand
closed'
sd/- M.HD. rsMArL ASS REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE ION OFFICER
To,
1 . The Principal District Judge,Jangaon.
4 Two CD Copies
kant/clr
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1211212024
ORDER
CRP.No.345O of 2024
1 H E s rA
J
t
0 6 I E 3 2025 C
at
*
PAT C
,b
Kolakani Lavanya and S/o Sri Srinivas
Gopagoni Sugunakar
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court