An aggrieved party filed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 challenging inaction regarding an interim application. The Court directed the Senior Civil Judge to dispose of the interlocutory application within four weeks.
Directed the Senior Civil Judge at Miryalguda to dispose of I.A. No. 279 of 2023 within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
CIVIL REVIS]ON PETITION NO: 2611 OF 2024
Petition under Article 227 constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order Passed in l.A.No. 279 ot 2o23 in o.S.No. 28 ot 2023 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Miryalguda.
Between:
Mohammad Ahmed Pasha, S/o Mahaboob Ali, Aged 42 year, Occ. Rice Mill Driver, R/o H.No. 14-323, Near C.P.M. Office, Seetharamapuram, Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District.
... PETITION ERYPETITIONER/PLA!NTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri. G Sundaresan
Counsel forthe Respondent : None appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
N I
'l !
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Civil RevisionPetition No.261L of 2024
ORDER
This Civil RevisionPetitionis frled under Article 227 of tl'e Constitutionof India seeking for a directionto the Senior Civil Judge' Mirayalguda todispose of I A'No'279 of 2023 .in O S No 28 o-2023 ' pending on its hle,expeditiously'
2
w -@
Z. Having regard to the fact that said Interlocutory Application is pending consideration since August, 2023, this Court is of the view that the trial court is to be directed to dispose of the aforesaid IA in a time bound manner
9 Subject to above direction, the Civil Revrsion pctition is disposed of. No order as to costs
Revision Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/. P. PAOMANABHA DY ASSISTANT REGI TRAR
/
//TRUE COPYII
To,
SECTION OFFICER
DL/gh
$
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/08/2024
6 fH!-- ,5
o
{4 ,i.
0 i il[l/ 202{
i
I ,i
' '
3.: " )4r,'1.i. 7
<br>==:-:i-::i/-
ORDER
CRP.No.26't 1 at 2024
CRP IS DISPOSED OF
tfs
%ffi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the trial court to dispose of the pending interim application in a time-bound manner.
Whether an interlocutory application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC requires expeditious disposal.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohammad Ahmed Pasha
Goundaboina Padma
Nama Ravinder
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
