Quashed

Sathish Kumar Macherla v. M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited

Telangana HC9 Feb 2024CRP/177/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside a salary attachment order issued in an execution petition under Article 227, holding that the lower court failed to issue notice to the guarantor/petitioner, violating Order XXI CPC. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with notice.

What did the court decide?

Setting aside the salary attachment order dated 14.12.2023 in E.P. No. 156 of 2020; remand of E.P. for disposal strictly in accordance with law with notice.

Sathish Kumar Macherla Vs M/s Shriram City Union Finance… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERBAD

¶2

' FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND n/VENTy FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURAALE SNT JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

clvtL REVtslON PETITION NO: I 77 0F 2024

¶6

Petitioir under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia, against the warrant of attachment of Salary issued in E.p.No. 1s6 of 2020 in Art. cise No.432 olzolr dt: 1411212023, on the file of ll Additional District Judge at Warangat.

¶7

Between:

¶8

sathish .Kumar Macherla, s/o Narasimhulu , Age about 44 years occ: Junior Linemerfl TSNeDcL, {o 1t ruo. 1-z-tiitzis,"iir-oLt". c6rony,' R;;;^-N; i, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/(J.Dr.No.2/Respondent No.2)

¶10

AND

¶11

M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited, Having its Reg Office at 123 , lrpqppa^{N.aikkamStreet, Chennai and having-its} Adm-inistrate, Office at No 3-6478, 4th Floor , Anand Estates, liberty Roat . Hvderabad havino irs Branch office at warangar - r, Represent6d by its GFA noioer . k.sT,niiasutu S/o Rangaiah, Age 47,^-Occ. Gen'eral Managti Rlo Warangii

¶12

..RespondenUDecree Holder/Cla imant.

¶13

Shaik Akbar, S/o ShareeJ, Age about 37 years ,Occ. Business, Office 1i-29_ 234, Ramanthapuri , 2nd Bank Colony, Warangal.

¶14

:..RespondenUJ.Dr.No.1/Respondent No.1

¶15

Mahender Jala, S/o Rajaiah , Age_about 38 years, Occ . Division Engineer, TSNPDCL, H.No. 1 1 -24491i!1,^{Pochammamaidan, MGM Road,Warangal} District .-

¶16

...RespondenUJ.Dr.No.3/Respondent No.3

¶17

4 T.he Divisional Enginee(DE), TSNpDCL, Nakkalagufta, Hanamkonda, Hanamkonda District

...GARNISHEE

,.1

-2-

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioh, ine nign court may ue pleaseJ to gr_"q .t"v of all further proceedings in E.p.No. 1s6 or 2o2o in Aib.case No. 432 ot 2017 dl. 1411212023, on the fite of the il Additional District Judge "t w"irngl including attaohment of salary before the Garnishee (Respondent-No.ay, penJing disposal of the C.R.P.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. MEESALA VINOD KUMAR

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI N.SRIKANTH GOUD

¶25

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶26

-1

¶27

I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶28

CIVIL REVISION PETITION^{No.I77 OF 2024}

¶29

..1

¶30

ORDEIT

¶31

I Icar-cl Sri M.Vinod Kutnar, Iearned^{counsel for the pctitioncr} and Sli N- Srikanth Goud, learned^{cotlnselappearingfor rcspondcnt} No. I

¶32

Irr vicrv of the nature of relief sought,^{noticeto respondent} Nos.2 to 4 is dispensed with.

¶33

l. -l'hc prcsent Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of thc^{('orrstitutiort} of Irrdia challenging^{the warrantof attachrncnto1-} salary tlatcd 14.12.2023^{in E.P.No.156 of 2020 in Arb. CaseNo.432} ol20 I 7 issucd by^tl.rc learned^{II Additional District Judge,Warangal}

¶34

Accorcling to thc^{petitioner,he} is^{guarantorto tltc loan and} rcspon(lcnt No.2 is loanee of^{respondentNo. l.Since'rcsportdcnt} No.l tlilcrl to pay loan, respoudent No.l^{herein has (llcd} i l applicatiorr urrtler Section 23 of the^{Arbitrationand ConciliationAct.} 199(r lbr rccovcry of au atnount of Rs.1,40,026/-^{witlr costs antl luturc} intcrest at -l(r') i, p.a. bascd on agl'eetnent^{enteredby respondcntNo.2} [{cs1-rorrtlc rr t No. I had^passed an award on^{02.02.2019 dircctirrgthc} pctitioucr arrtl respottdcnt Nos.2 and 3 herein. to^pay a^{sttttr ol} I{s.1.-l(}.()16 - to thc rcsl.rottdent No. I hetcin^{jointlyand scvcrallyrvith}

¶35

¶36

-l

¶37

subsequent intcrest at 12^t\t l)cr annurlr fronr tlre date ol'the claiur petition i.e., 10.05.2017 to till thc datc of rcalization and also pay a surn of Rs.3. | 25 towards costs

¶38

Accordin.g to respontlent No. I, respondcnt No.2 drd not pay the said ainount.^'fhcrclorc. it has lllcd on cxccution petition vide E.P.No. 156 of 2020. Viclc orulcr datcd 14. 12.2023. lcarned lI Additional District Judgc. Wararrgal issucd salary attachntcrrt order. Though thc sairl cxccutiorr pctilrorl was filcd by the petitioucr in thc ycar, 2020, lcalncd l1 Adclitiorral District .ludgc has passcd iutpugncd order only on l.l. I 2.102..^'l-hclc is no nrcntion about scrvicc of noticc on petitioncr as rvcll rs lcsporrdcrrt Nos.2 and 3. Thercforc, it is not a reasoued ordcr. Accolclirr.t to thc lcarncrl counscl for-the petitioner, the said ortlcl rvas rror allL'ctcrl :trrtl salaly ol' thc pctitio rrcr /guarantor not even dcducted

¶39

As tliscusscd su1.rlu. llrcrc is rro nrcrrtion with rcgald to the servicc of noticc orr thc ;.rctirroncr arrrl aflbrcling oppoltunity to the petitioner hercirr u'hilc issuing inrPuqrrecl salaly attachlnent older. Thcrclbrc. thc slrrnc rs irr r iollrtion ol'Ortlcl XXI ol'CP(' 7. Accortlinslr'. rlrc^('ii'rl [{cr.isiorr l,ctition is disposcd of setting aside thc irrrl rrrgnctl srrf rrrv rrttircluncnt or(lcl- dated 14 12.2023 itt E..P.No. l5(r ol' ll)10 irr Arb ( irsc No.4-lf ol 2017 passcd by ll

¶40

¶41

/'l

¶42

Adtlitional District Juclgc, Warangal and E.P.No. 156 of 2020 is rernandcd back to the lealncd II Additionat District Judge, Warangal with a dircction to dispose it of strictly in accordance with law by putting tlre pctitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3 on notice by aflording opportunity to thcm. Libefty is granted to them to challenge thc award dated 02.02.2019 in Arb.No.432 of 2017 passed by thc Arbitral^-f ribr.rnaI of Solc Arbitrator at Warangal. There shall be no oldcr as to c()sts

¶43

As a setpel, thc rniscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall

¶44

stand c losctl

¶45

SD'- V. HARI^PRASAO ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY/'

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

The ll^{AdditionalDistrictJud$E at Warangal'}

¶50

One CC to^{SRl. MEESALAVINOD KUMARAdvocate IOPUCI}

¶51

One CC^{to SRl. N SRIKANTH GOUD Advocat'e [OPUCI}

¶52

4 Two CD coPies

cvk

c$k

HIGH COURT

DATED: 091O2t2024

/,4...:
. di s
+. '"at
,.)a-
i) ({<br>i) 02 lini r.i4
Ie
al
* .l
l.; ic r.r:.'-C

ORDER

CRP.No.177 of 2024

CRP IS DTSPOSED OF.

t
-{.

Sathish Kumar Macherla v. M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathish Kumar Macherla v. M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gonuguntla Veeramma Vs Mandalapu Ramaiah

Bhavanasi Venkata Manjula Vs Smt. Pamayyagari Parameshwari

Sri. Gourishetty Srinivas and Another Vs M/s. Karvy Data Management Services Limited

Kolipaka alias Puligilla Rajeshwari Vs Kolipaka Sharada, (Died)

Chitti Reddy Mahender Reddy Vs Smt. P.Shirisha

Challa Umadevi Vs Pinninti Prakash Rao