Dismissed

L.Chander v. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt. Ltd.

Telangana HC11 Jan 2024CRP/1251/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Telangana High Court dismissed an interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay and a stay, along with the principal civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory application and civil revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications closed.

L.Chander Vs Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt. Ltd. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

-t I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶3

[³³⁸⁵¹

¶4

AT HYDERABAD

¶5

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶8

l.A.No.2 ot 2023

¶9

ln/And

¶10

CIVIL REVIS]O N PETITION NO: 1251 OF 2023

¶11

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 21-1 1-2O22 in E.P.No. l5 ol 2022 in ARB.No.135 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Sangareddy.

¶12

Between:

¶13

L. Chander, S/o Kemiya Nayak, Occ. Police Constable-z%O, R/o. Kotalaguda Village, Vikarabad Mandal and Distriet.

¶14

S.Gopal, S/o S. Ramaiah, Occ.Teacher,R/o.H.no.4-32, Enkatala Village, Mominpet Mandal,Vikarabad District.

¶15

B.Krishna, S/o B.Bhaskar, Occ. Hindi Pandit at ZPHS, Manneguda Village, Pudur Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, R:/o.H.No.4-1-347lA3,Near Narsing Function Hall, Backside, Vikarabad mandal, Vikarabad Diskict.

¶16

...Petitioner/JDRs 2 to 4

¶17

AND

¶18

Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd, Sanga Reddy Branch, at H.No. 3-8-371A, Second Floor, Telecom colony, Balaji Nagar, Bypass Road,Near Government Tara Degree College, Sangareddy Town and District Rep. By its Legal Officer, K. Vamshinath S/o Ramesh, Rl/o. Sangareddy town and district.

¶19

...RespondenUDecree Holder

¶20

2 Md Khaja Miya, S/o Md. Shaik Ali, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Enkatala Village, Mominpet Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶21

...RespondenUl't JDR

¶22

lA NO: 3 OF m23

¶23

Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tlrc High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including recovery of amount from the Petitioners to the Credit of E.P.No.15 ol 2022 in ARB No. 135 of 2O13, pending drsposal of Crvil Revision Petition -

¶24

IA NO t20F 2023

¶25

Petition under Section¹⁵¹ CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} thc affidavit filed in oupport^{of thc} Petition,^{the High Court maybe} Pleaeed^be pleased to condone the delay of 35 days in filing the C.R.P of^2023.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri Khaja Moinuddin(not^present)

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents

¶28

The Court made the following

¶29

: ORDER

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJAI{A

¶31

I.A. No. 2 of 2o23

¶32

In And

¶33

C.R.P.No.1251 OF 2023

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

This Interlocutory application is filed to condone the delay of (35) days in filing the C.R.P. No. I251 of 2023

¶36

This Civit Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2022 passed in E.P. No. 15 of 2022 in ARB. No. 135 of 2013, on the hle of the Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy.

¶37

There is no representation for the petitioner, since last three adjournments. Even today, there is no representation on beha-lf of the petitioner, in spite of Listing the matter under the caption "for dismissa-I". Hence it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.

¶38

[n vieu, of the above, I.A. No. 2 of 2023 is dismissed for Non- Prosecution. Consequently, C.R.P. No. 1251 of 2023 is dismi ssed.

¶39

Pending Miscellaneous Appliiations, if any, shall stand closed.

¶40

/TRUE COPY/

¶41

SD/- C. PRAVEEN^KUMAR ASSISTANTREGISTRAR .,,'' cD,----

¶42

SECTION OFFICER

¶43

To,

¶44

'1. The Junior Civil Judge at Sangareddy

¶45

re;

¶46

? 9n" !!^{t_o Sf Khaja Moinuddin,Advocate} tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies SP/SP .

HIGH COURT

DATED:^{1 110112024}

E STA'TE.
1
( ^a,'l'
ootr 21 UAH 2[2[
)
,t
* )
OESpA f (l Yr(; :,

¶52

ORDER l.A.No.2 ot²⁰²³ !N/AND GRP.No.1251 ot^2O23

¶53

DISMISSING^{THE CRP} AND l.A.No.2^{OF 2023} FOR NON.PROSECUTION \4^u h,P

L.Chander v. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Chander v. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. R.Madhavi Latha Vs S.Surendra Babu

Mrs. Nagulapalli Aruna Vs Taidala Mahender

Raja , Radha Ramulu Vs Panala Prabhakar Reddy

M/s. Geetha Enterprises Vs Sardar Baldev Singh Sokhi

M/s. Shreya Homes Vs Kondakal Sai Reddy

State Teachers Union- T.S Vs Doddapaneni Narasimha Rao