Dismissed

Sreerama Arvind Volety v. The State Telangana of and another

Telangana HC8 Aug 2024CRLRC/35/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Criminal Revision Case where the revision filed against a 2022 order was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying criminal trial concluded in an acquittal judgment dated 25.06.2024. Consequently, the petition for a stay of proceedings in the main case was no longer tenable.

What did the court decide?

The petition for stay and the Criminal Revision Case were dismissed as infructuous.

Sreerama Arvind Volety Vs The State Telangana of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^329e ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 35OF 2023

¶7

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.PC against the Order daled 0111112022 made in Crl.M.P.No.642 ol 2021 in C.C.No.2l0 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magiskate( Mahila Court )at Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sreerama Arvind Volety, S/o Late.Sri Volety Sreerama Chary Aged about 62 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.7-1-70lD, Dharam Karan Roa Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶10

...Petitioner(RespondenUAccused)

¶11

AND

¶12

¶13

The State Telangana, Rep by public prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad

¶14

2 Smt.Roopa volety, Wo Sreerama Arvind Volety, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H-No.7-1-70lD, Dharam Karan Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶15

... Respondents(Petitioners/Complai nant )

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in Crl.MP No. 642 of 2021 in CC No. 210 of 2014 dated 0111112022 on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila court) at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main revision case, in the interest of justice.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. V.Mythili

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s. Madhavi, Assistant Public Prosecutor

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri V.V. Raghavan

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE FTONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶23

CFf,MINAL REVISION CASE No.35 0F 2023

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed se.eking to set aside the order dated O1.11.2022 in Crl.M.p.No.64i) of 2O2l in C.C.No.21O of 201.4 on the file of the learned XIII Adclitional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), at Hyderabad (for short, "the tria-l C ourt").

¶26

HearC Ms.Mythili, learned counsel for the pt:titioner and Ms.S.Madhavi, learned Assistant public prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1 -State.

¶27

l,eamed Assistant Public prosecutor, by filing. the copy of e-Courts proceedings, would submit that the C.C.No.2lO of 2Ol4 has enderl up in acquittal vide judgment d,ated 25.06.2024. Therefore, she would submit that no further orders are required in this Re*ision and seeks to dismiss the Revision as infructuous.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes to the said request.

¶29

Reccrding the submissions of both the learnec counsel and upon penrsing the copy of e-Courts proceedings, :his Criminal Revision C)ase is dismissed as infructuous.

-!s ,1

<br>

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed

¶34

SD/- T KRISHNA KUMAR, DEPU REGISTRAR.

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila court) at Hyderabad

¶39

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana al Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

One CC to Mis. V.Mythili, Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

One CC to Sri V.V. Raghavan, Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Two CD Copies

ADK }y'

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810812024

ORDETI

CRLRC.No.35 of 2023

.(a R iti S S ,A
rl)
U f ,'.
t: TLI
2E Ir;T Wl >ir
'v ,1;,t
a),. J.r
- -'h.7r r-,J.^ ' - -2
\=__.,-z

¶49

DISMIIiSING THE CRLRC AS !NFRUCTUOUS

¶50

\ uA

Sreerama Arvind Volety v. The State Telangana of and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sreerama Arvind Volety v. The State Telangana of and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vidyasagar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sri Vidya Enterprises Vs M/s Kemicides Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd.. And Another

Lanka venkata Laxmi Narayana Vs The state of Telangana

Mandapalli Pradeep Kumar Vs B.Bixam

Chodavarapu Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Mandhala Sravani @ Sunil Vs The State of Telangana