Criminal revision jurisdiction exists. Counsel for petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted permission and dismissed the criminal revision case as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw granted; criminal revision case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:311 OF 2013
Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of CrpC against the order dated 16.08.2012 passed in crl.M.P.No.2130 of 2012 on the file of the Honble court of the Xlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
AND
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLRCMP. NO:472 oF 2013)
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all furthe proceedings including personal appearance of the petitioner/accused No. 2 to 5 in C.C.No. 313 ot 2011 on the file of the Hon,ble Xlll Addl. Chief M.M., Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI P VAMSHEEDHAR REDDY.,
Counsel for the Respondentl : SRI VIZARATH ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTO;I Counsel for the Respondent.2: None
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.311 OF 2013
ORDER:
The present criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C aggrieved by the order dated 16.O8.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.213O of 2Ol2 in C.C.No.313 of 2Ol1 on the file of the XIII Addi.ional Chief Metropolital Magistrate (Mahila Court) at Hyderabad.
3. Permission is accorded
4. Accordingly, the criminal revision case is dismissed
as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, If any, pendirrg in this
criminal revision case, shall also stand dismisse<l
SD/- I NAGALAKSHMI, DEiPUTY REGISTRAR.
')'^//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
*-b"-
I
HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.311 ot 2013
.r '.,
/<br>'.. ,J
i'il
0 4 "LrL 202{ a
*
flFSPATCH gO
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL R,C. AS WTHDRAWN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.S.MALIK and others
STATE OF A-P.
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
