High Court closed a criminal revision dispute as non-prosecution due to the petitioner's long-term absence and lack of interest. Proceedings were marked discontinued pending miscellaneous matters.
Criminal Revision Case closed as non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous applications directed to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BAIL SLIP : The Petitioner/ Accusedwas directed to be released on bail by the order of the High Court dated.1.1l.2010 in Crl.R. C. tvl.P. No. 2973 of 201O in Cd.R C No.2019 of 2010.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTHDAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CAS E NO:2019 OF 2010
Criminal Revision Case filed underSection397 and 401 of Cr.PC against the Judgment dated25.10 2010 passedin Crl.Appeal.No16012010 on the file of the court of the Spl.Judgefor the Trial of offences under scs d]r-e;| and sTs (PoA) Act cum Vl Addt.n/etropolitan Sessions Judge cum XX Addl.chief Judge, Secunderabad,preferred against the Judgment daled22 O4'2o1Oin c.c.No 346 of 2007 onthe file of the court of the X Addl. chiefrMetropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.
Between:
Bodasu Satyanarayana. S/o B.Veeraiah @Venkataiah, Occ: Business,R/o '12- 1 5-120t A. M'anikeshwari Nagar,O. U.Campus,Hyderabad
...Accused/Petitioner/Appellant
AND
... Respondents/Respondents/Respondent
Gounsel for the Petitioner : Sri. shiva Shanker chowdary(Not Present)
counsel for the RespondentNo. 1: Sri E. Ganesh Assistant Public Prosecutor
Counsel for the RespondentNo' 2: Sri Sunil Kumar Pittala
The Court made the foltowing;ORDER
,l'"1 /f;'' 7 ! t.
I l
II
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISTON CASE No.2Ol9 OF 2O1O
ORDER:
Therr: rvas no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner 1br long time. This Court vide order dated 27.O8.2O24, directed the ). Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Secunderabad to issue warl zrnts against the petitioner, for the reir.son of nonappearance o:- either counsel or party in proceedings. Pursuant to the said direction, the learned Magistrate has submitted a report in to the Regir;lrv vide Dis. No.1357/X ACIM/Sec'badl2024, dated 13.O8.2024 s"-irting that the concerned counsel not filed process for issuance of urarrant inspite of repeated reminders
.".(1
i
2
r-l
Asa sequel, pendingmiscellaneous applications,ifany,
shall stand closed.
\
EKHARRAO Sd/- N.CHANDRAS DE REGISTRAR CTION OFFIGER
//TRUECOPY//
To,
DL
@i
t)
,t'i'i
I
'*&:,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212024
:::.-
.r..2:=::
(i '/F
t
(('
o ? I fiAN ZIffi
o2
"tt:
..
-l)l .t .. .rl ,r gO
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2019 of i1010
CRIMINAL REVISIO],.I CASE IS CLOSED AS NON.PROSECUTION
,W
I
I .:,
Bodasu Satyanarayana
The State of A.P.
V.Lingam
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
