Criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging an order of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad; dismissed for non-prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared on two consecutive listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I329s I
IN THE HIGHCOURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THETWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASENO: 1861 0F 2013
Revision filedundersections 3g7l4o1 of crPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledinsupportoftheCriminalRevision Case, the HighCourt may be pleasedto set aside the order dt 14 05 2013 passed in Crl.MP.No.338l2O1Oon the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge' Cyberabad atL. B.Nagar, Hyderabad'
Between:
V Sanieeva Reddv,S/o V.Narasimha Reddy. Ag-ed about 50 years'Occ e;il.i, Rlig-iislr HNilrNagar Nacharam R R District
..Petitioner/ Petitioner
AND
All are resident:; of Kondapur Village Ghatkeswar [/landalR.R.District
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner(s) : SRI M. Jayaram Reddy(Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : Assistant Public Prosecutor
Counsel for the respondent No. 2to 13 : ...
The Court made the following Order:-
I
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASENo.1861of2013
ORDER:
None appears for thepetitionerthough the matter was listed today under thecaption 'for dismissal'Even on the previous date of hearing i.e.,on 26.03.2024 'there was no representation for thepetitioner.Thus, itappearsthat the petitioner is not interested toprosecutethe matter vigilantly ald diligently anymore. Therefore,this CriminalRevisionCase is triab1e to be dismissedfor non-prosecution.
Accordingiy, this CriminalRevision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution
Pending miscellaneousapplications, if any, shall stand
closed
Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY
//TRUE COPY/i
P;TRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To
Yv
| ..'
HIGH GOURT
DATED:23nA12024
ORDER
t;.i.''r EOF
o
$11 a
A
,\t tr\
)o I
o
I DI:- SP tr
CRLRC.No.1861 of 2013
DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS NON PROSECUTION
+,ra(d V. -i6'r
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V Sanjeeva Reddy
The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Hyderabad
Vangeti Janga Reddy
Vangeti Yella Reddy
Vangeti Mohan Reddy
Vangeti Prabhakar Reddy
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
