Petitioners filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against them. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet was already laid. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[338s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTETMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9173 OF 2023
Between:
Both the petitioners No.1 and 2 are presently residing at Flat.No.3O4, Ace Ajantha, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad, Telangana State- 500068.
-..PETITIONER/A-2 & A-3
AND
De-facto Com pla ina nURespondent No.2
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings against the petitioners/A-2 and A-3 in connection with Crime in FIR No.'163 of 2O23, on the frle of Narkatpally Police Station, Nalgonda district.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the High Court may
be pleasedto stay all furtherproceedingsagainst the petitioners/A-2 and A-3in connectionwithcrirneinF.l.R.No.-l63of2o2l,onthefileofNarkatpallypolice station, Nalgondadistrict, during pending disposal of present quash petition'
This Petitioncomingon for hearing' upon perusingthe Memorandum of GroundsofCrimin:rlPetiti-onanduponhearingtheargUmentsclfSrisRlN|VAS KAPATIA,AdvocatrlforthePetitionersandthePublicProsecutorfortheStateof Telanganaon behalf of the RespondentNo'1 and P Amarender Reddy'Advocate for the ResPondentNo 2.
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLESMT.JUSTICEK. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 of2o23
ORDER:
The present CriminalPetition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedingsthat are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.163 of2023 of NarkatpallyPoliceStation' Nalgonda District'
As a sequel,miscellaneous petitions pending' if any' shall stand
closed.
Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
4 One CC to SRl. SRINIVAS KAPATIA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. P AIVIARENDER REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 6 Two CD Copies
PR Y*'
HIGH COURT DATED:1310912024
ORDER
CRLP.No.9173 of2023
.-::':'
,..'-.:. ,:-
,t,. .r
_t
.l
r' 0Ij lr:l:rl4
i/
. -:r7
DISMISSING THECRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
qrQt*w
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quash of proceedings becomes infructuous after the laying of the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rudrareddy Meredy
Sadhana Reddy Meredy
State of Telangana
Sowmya Meredy
K. SUJANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
