Allowed

Jonnalagadda Venkat Reddy , v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Sept 2024CRLP/7750/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed Criminal Petition No. 7750 of 2024 and Interim Applications Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of 2024. Proceedings in C.C. No. 580 of 2022 were quashed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 to Sainik Welfare and the High Court Advocates Association as per parties' compromise.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in C.C. No. 580 of 2022 quashed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 and filing of proof.

Jonnalagadda Venkat Reddy , Vs The State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[^33E51

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY ,THE TENTH^{DAY OFSEPTETVIBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT.JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶7

l.A.Nos. 2^{AND3 0F 2024} IN'AND

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITI^{ON NO:775OOF 2024}

¶9

Between:

¶10

'^{i??i:1',?,?,x':i"yEl5:,ff::il;';,."8!:-::3fl'T"?"11i0ft53J3"ffJ"';""':fi}

¶11

'ittiti+lfl:ftTiiu,r*,ffiq'ffi*n{li1iJ1ffi ;;ii;

¶12

.iffiild":lj"#"flir**I*i',tffi{i"ieigfl#r'lsi%l

¶13

1 35/l..konathalapallY

¶14

Komareddigudem

¶15

' +'iii'idh"hffi ffiii r,ih^-::.::::: J::.1

¶16

AND .L ^ o, ,r-\l,c^{prosecutorHigh court of}

¶17

, +m:f1fi!.I?:1:'r1". re'^{bY *"} ::;;';;, R:i#:" #""?1:iR:tn"::"

¶18

AND

¶19

'i"iliffi^{S3:S"'f-""J"1"T:i"J;3ji'ii'"&i:TI'ffi} District'

¶20

"'ResPondents

¶21

f*#ili,,l''lffiⁱ il1;;.;q3[=[i1['1i',",'+#i':{-"':ffi to4

¶22

¶23

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2024

¶24

Petition trnder Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in^{the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^maybe pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 580 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nidmanoor against the petitioners/ Accused No.'l to 4, pending drsposal of the above criminal petition.

¶25

l.A. Nos: 2 & 3 0F 2024

¶26

Between

¶27

Jonnalagadda Bhasker Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy, Aged 3g years, Occ.. Self R/o 1-7e Konathatapany tirir-s; ;i T;d;iXiam rrranoar, Narsonda 5[flf,t1""

¶28

...Petitioner/RespondenUDe-facto Complainant

¶29

AND

¶30

'1 Jonnalagadda Venkat

¶31

fl ff ,#,H$:#:1{:E:,..T,srit::{JiSsf t*?lfl ri"fj,i,o,ifl ,,,""":,

¶32

2 Sitta Sudhakar Redc

¶33

,ff :,.i:a$;i:lkf^{i#.ri:llt",*,,fl} hr"iHiffI??';

¶34

"^{ifi:T,#;lflqa::'",,#:fr,:#} ^t****li

¶35

'iil[ilf*']:*:,ffi j;tft"jfl :^ie^",%B:,rnrilf"T,

¶36

i]ftl,#]il5;x

¶37

'lli",::l:i,,r....,,:i:r,"1:rH"Jffi :";.::H';;1:Ji::

¶38

it*'-**',:r*fi ,,,.Ut'ffi * r, .,2J. t06 R/w Sq trlC_"

! i

lr //

t.A. No 3 OF 2024

ryrln;rff#-++* r

;';li,".ffi ffi rffi k11fi,f i:.:,.r."r:,/;,;",;; The Court made the following: COMIION ORDER

¶44

¶45

JUSTICE^{K' SUJANA} TITE^{IION'BLE STIT'} it^{3of 2} 1.A.N^os.2 it of IO^NNo.1

¶46

c ERi ilI o c for^the submiited^{by learned counselaPPeartng} It-^rs dencY^of as^{well as respondentNo'2' that during pen} petitionersthe Present^{Criminal Petition'the Partieshave comPromised the} matter^{and accordinglY'I'ANos.2 and 3 of' 2024 have been liled} to record^{the comPromisebetweenthem and to compound the} offences.

¶47

Vide order^{dated 28'08'2024'this Court directedthe} parties^{along with their respective counselto appear before the} Secretary,^{High Court Legal ServicesCommittee' High Court for} the State^{of Telangana, Hyderabad'for identifrcationandto} submit a^report.

¶48

Pursuant to^{the above said directionissued by this Court'} the partics have appeared^{and the Secretary,High Court Legal} Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, datecl 06.09.2024 and the same is placed on record.

¶49

4 rn vien, or the above,I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are all)Wed, Consequently, this Criminal Petition proceedings in C.C.No.Sl IS allow:d and the cia.ss Masrsr.a,";,-;;;.."^{ot 2022} on the file of Jrrdjcra,l First lnoor, agarnsl 166 peti tjone; s/accused

¶50

¶51

Nos. I to 4 are hereby quashed subject to the peUtioners paying an arnount of Rs.S,ooo/_ (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52lgg926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2OO7O), IFSC Code:SBINOO2OO7O, MICR No.S00004057) and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

¶52

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶53

Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECT|ON OFFTCER

To,

1 The Judicial Maoistrate of First Class, at Nidmanoor, Nalgonda 2 rhe Sration Houie ofncer, ihriila.r-a;'p;iil Statron, Natgonda : lfrg s9c1e1ary, High .court r_elsJiSe;ic;;6mmitrbe,-E-ijn court for the State of Telangana at Hyderaba-d.Telangana at Hyderaba-d.Hyderaba-d.

¶58

State of Telangana at Hyderaba-d.Telangana at Hyderaba-d.Hyderaba-d.

¶59

4 Two ccs to thle puutic^'pioseiutor, High court for the State of rerangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶60

! 9nu^{CC ro Sri MJttangiRami} Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl.' 9 9n"^{CC to Sri G RaviAdvocrte} iO'iuCl'-** 7 . fwo CD Copies

¶61

N^jh,t)t_

¶62

(ALONG WITH A COpy oF JOTNT MEMO OF COMpRoMtsE)

¶63

Note: Total Amount of Rs.^.10,000/ ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Mullanqi Rami Reddv. counser io. f,. p"tition"i. ", directed by the Hon,bre Courr vrde order dated 1'o Og 2024 r. nr. SpOb) i''nJp""" Five thousand onty ) to the^"Director, Sainik werfare . Hyderabad, "nJ^{it'i,ooor-( Rupees Five thousand} only ) to the Terangana High court navocates nssJciation, Hyderabad and fired Memo as proof of comprr'ance usR N;.-- goiad ot zozq dated 20092024

¶64

I I I I i ili ii I I IIIti F $I

¶65

HIGH COURT

¶66

DATED:10l0gl2024

¶67

,' 'i.. -
''')is,
'z'\1t
r_ill
.ut ?i
_i ,/
it

¶68

COMMON ORDER

¶69

l.A.Nos.2&3of2024 ln/and

¶70

CRLP.No.7750 of 2024

¶71

ALLOWING BOTH THE I.A'S & CRIMINAL PETITION

¶72

I ,4 I I i

¶73

I I ! t iI i I l t I!I ! ! I I ! i a i ,

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT:HYDERABAD

¶78

CRLP NO. OF 2024

¶79

Between:

¶80

Jonnalagadda^{Venkat Reddy} ,^{S/o. China Gopal Reddy,} Aggd^^45^{years, Occ:Agriculture & EX-Sarpanch} R/dl?onathalapally^{Village df Tripura ramMandal,} Nalgonda Oistrict.

¶81

Katta Sudhakar^{Reddy,S/o. Narayana Reddy,} . rr, \

¶82

Aged 47^{years, Occ: Electrician & Agriculture,Plb'ldlHd)rd& 6LtS</sup>}

¶83

@.^{Konathalapally Village of Tripuraram Mandal,} Nalgonda District.

¶84

Jonnalagadda^{Shanthankumar Reddy@5\nqfth^ St'vo@Jh,} S/o.Late Ravinder^{Reddy, Aged:36yearsrOcc:Software} "

¶85

rng*"*, R/a. U'"0'^{t^lxd'} k"trarrq&,'&rriort,'r" @.^{Konathalapally Village of Tripuraram Mandal,} Nalgonda District.

¶86

Jonnalagadda^{Ravinder Reddy, S/o. Kondal Reddy,} Aged 62^{years, Occ: Agriculture,f,ltr:l'6+h, tto'ra:a[;} 6,Opr1. '- ryO.^{Konathalapally Village of Tripuraram Mandal,} Nalgonda District'

¶87

......^petitionerv Accused^{Nos. 1 tof.}

¶88

¶89

And

¶90

The State of^{Telangana rep. by the public Prosecutor} High Court of^{Telangana,Hyderabad.}

¶91

Jonnalagadda^{Bhasker Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy,} Age(^39 Years,^{Occ: Self EmPloYee,} RTdf onathala^{pally Village of Tripuraram Mandal,} Nalgonda District'

¶92

...... Respondents

¶93

JOINT MEMO

¶94

It is respectfully submit^{that The Petitionersand defacto} Comp lainant have^{settled the dispute amicably at} h inte rveⁿ tio^n\Lb-ed++- ) R &cl@ke 6'lta

¶95

D^\Lb-ed++-

¶96

1J-

¶97

been compromised between them without putting any conditions hence the both parties are come to compromise the proceedings in Charge sheet CC No. 580 of 2022 on the file of the Hon,ble Judiciat First Class Magistrate at Nidmanoor for offences under Sec 307, 32.4,. 323,506 R/w 34 IpC and record the compromise and quash the proegedihgs in the.above charge sheet and the parties have no cratms or rights against each other in the future.

¶98

.^{.,.:_. .:..',:.r} ,.' , I^.7t rt co u n6dl'#nu B.r,r,o, u ^ PETITIO ER/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT

¶99

CO FOR RESPONDENT

¶100

L ri.u-- EJ*l 2. ,.suKq)rSlqddy ) RESPONDENT N().1 to 4,

Jonnalagadda Venkat Reddy , v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jonnalagadda Venkat Reddy , v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varikuppala Jangaiah Vs State of Telangana

Naba Krishna Dutta Vs The State of Telangana

Prasadam Raghu Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sadguru properties Vs The State of Telangana

Gaddampally Rajeshwar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Jonnalagadda Bhaskar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana