Petitioners accused in Crime No.350 of 2021 sought to quash the FIR; counsel sought permission to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to file a fresh application. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4838 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO..I & 2
AND
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,praying thatin thecircumstances stated in the [/emorandum of Grounds ofCriminalPetition,the HighCourt may be pleased toquash the First lnformationReport in Crime No.350of 2021 ,of rhe SHO, P.S. Shamirpet, Cyberabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C-,praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings including the arrestof the petitioners (A 1 and 42) in Crime No.350 of 2021 of the SHO, P.S. Shamirpet,Cyberabad
l.A. NO: l OF 2023
Between:
L
Avagani Sarala, Wo Narasimha Aged 30years,Occ: House wife, R/o House No 3--102lA, Thoomkunta Village Shamirpet Mandal,Medchal District,
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFACTO- COMPLAINANT
AND
RESPONDENT No.3/RESpONDENT NO.3/COMpLAtNANT
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay orders granted in r.A.No.2 of 2021 . n Crl.P.No.4838 of 2021,dated 29-06-2021,iri Cr.No.3SO of 2021 ,in C C.No.61 of 2022,on the file of Principal Junior civil Judge, -cum- Vll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar pelition and upon hearing the arguments of sri v'R.MACHAVARAM,Advocate for the petitioner and None Appeared for Respondent No.1 and sri M.shiva shekar for Respondent No.2 and the pubric Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 3
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESMT. JUSTICEK. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.4636of 2O2L
ORDER:
Learned counsel forpetitionersseeks permission of this court to withdrawthe criminal Petition with liberty to file fresh
application atan appropriate time'
.) Accordingly, theCriminal Petition isdismissedas
withdrawngiving liberty as sought for'
Miscellaneousapplications, ifany pending,shall also
stand ciosed.
I
Sd/, K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1. The Court of XXlll Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal,Cyberabad.
PCSD/DL
ctt
(L
HIGH COURT DATED:0410912024
ORDER
CRLP.No.4838 of 2021
{HE S i4
(
)
o.J
0 5 N0\l 202t
*
\ Dr .I pAT C ur90
DlSMISSING THE CR!MINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
0r\ $th,,
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avagani Narasimha
Bolgam Padma
The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad
Avagani Sarala
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
