Allowed

Bandaru Ramesh Babu v. The State of Telengana

Telangana HC13 Aug 2024CRLP/4610/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order granting relief in three connected petitions filed under Sections 482 and 320 Cr.P.C. The Court allowed the petitions and quashed criminal proceedings following a compromise, conditioned on the payment of Rs. 10,000 to Sainik Welfare and the High Court Advocates Association.

What did the court decide?

I.A. Nos. 3 and 4 allowed; main Cr. Petition allowed; proceedings in C.C. No. 600 of 2023 quashed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000.

Bandaru Ramesh Babu Vs The State of Telengana — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

.qa!iEq#r:-_--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶7

t.A. NOS. 3 ANO 4 0F 2024 IN / AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO:4610 OF 2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bandaru Ramesh Babu, Sio. Late Ramulu, Aged 35 years, Occ. private lmployee,^{R/o. Flat No 565, Vinayaka Hitt-ls,PhaSe-|, Road No. 1,} Almasguda, B.! Reddy, lyderabad, N/o. H. No. 4-244, Goftigundatapalem, Kondapuram (M), Nellore Dist. A.P.

¶10

Bandaru Padmavathi, Wo. Late Ramulu, Aged 60 years, Occ. Flcuse Wife, Rl/o. H. No. 4-244, Goftigundalapalem, Kondapuram (lrl;, Nellore Dist. A.p.

¶11

Koppalli Sudharshana, Wo. Nagendra Babu, Aged 40 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o H. No. 4-244, Gottigundalpalem, Kontapurani (M), l.lellore Dist. A.P.

¶12

...Petitioner / Accused No. 1 to 3

¶13

¶14

Thg. State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶15

Smt Kukkapalli Arunavathamma, Wio. Srinivas Naidu, Age 53 ]rears, Caste Kamma (Chowdhary), R/o. Atmakur, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh'- 524322

¶16

,,.Respondents

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C. praying that in the cifcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in C.C. llo. 600 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at LB Nagar against the Petitioner No. 1 to 3,

.'E-E+

l.A. NO:2^{oF 2024}

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr'P'Cpraying that in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to stay all^{furtherproceedingsin C C No' 600 of 2023on the file of} Hon'bleVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate'Medchal-MalkaigiriDistrictatLB Nagar^{pending disposalof the above Criminal Petition'}

¶22

r.A. NO :3OF^2O24

¶23

Between:

¶24

Smt Kukkapalli^{Arunavathamma,Wo Srinivas Naidu' Aoe 53 vears' Caste} Kamma tctrowcrnarvi,'^{ftil] Ail;#' N;i6ie' Ano trra P ridesh'-524322}

¶25

...Petitioner^{/ Respondent/ Defacto Complainant} rn l.A' No' 3^{& 4 ot 2O24}

¶26

AND

¶27

Bandaru^{Ramesh Babu, S/o. LateRamulu,Aged 35 vears, occ. Private} Emolovee, Rl/o. Flat^{rio]'toi]'Vit"v"I"'Hiii"Pha6e-l' Road. No' 1'} ii;l'#e;&.'rir.r n"Jiv,^{Hva6i#aa, ur'o H No 4-244 Gottisundalapalem'} konda-puram^{(M),Nellore Dist. A P'}

¶28

Bandaru Padmavathi,^{Wo. Late Ramulu,Aged 60 years, Occ' HouseWife'} ' Hzu: H:i{;."iillo.jttig'r;,0"1"*i"1"'' k"ho""puram^(M;' Nellore^{Dist A'P'}

¶29

Koooalli Sudharshana,^{Wo. Nagendra Babu' Aged 40 vears Occ'House} " \i;i{-i/.:"fr:'ii;.'?-ri4,"6"ti6i"i"iprt;*-koniapurani^{(M)' Nerrore Dist'} A.P.

¶30

... Res^{po n d e n ts / Pe ti ti o n e rs, /atT]r"i} 1t;1!t&l

¶31

The State^{of Telangana,Rep by Public Prosecutor'High Court of Telangana} at Hyderabad

¶32

*" " Hi ii iF. 1 i a1':? T6lo

¶33

Petition under^{Section 320 (6) of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to permit the^{Petitioner/ De-facto Complainantto compound the offence} registered against^{the Respondents / AccusedNo' 1 to 3 in compromise and quash} the proceedings^{in C.C. No. 600 ol 2023 on the file of Hon'bleV Additional} Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Medchal-MalkaigiriDistrict at LB Nagar for the offence} under section^{489-4 lPC, 3 and4 of DP Act'}

¶34

l.A.NO: 4OF 2024

¶35

Petition under Section 320 (2) ot Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstan@s stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, ttre High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner / De-facto Complainant to record the compromise accorded between the Petitioner / De-facto Complaint and Respondents / Accused No. 1 to 3 and quash proceedings in C.C. No. 600 of 2023 on the file of Hon,ble V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at LB Nagar.

¶36

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Chandra Mohan Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri N Yashwanth, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.

¶37

The Court made the following Common Order :

¶38

€

¶39

¶40

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. WSTICE K' SUJANA}

¶41

I.A.Nos.3^{and 4of2024} in/and ONN^o.461Oof2o24 cRIMINAL

¶42

COMMON^ORDER:

¶43

It is submitted^{by learned counsel appearingfor the} as well^{as the respondentNo'2' that during} petitioners pendency of^{the presentCriminal Petition'the partieshave} compromised^{the matter and accordingly'I'A'Nos 3 and 4 of} 2024havebeenliledtorecordtJrecompromisebetweenthem and to comPound^{the offences'}

¶44

Vide or'ler^{dated 19'07'2O24'this Court directedthe} parties along^{with their respective counsel to appear before the} Secretary,^{High CourtIegait Sewices Committee' High Court for} the State^{of Telangana,Hyderabad' for identification and to} submit^{a rePort.}

¶45

Pursuant^{to the abovesaid direction issued by this Court'} the parties^{have appeared and the Secretary' High Court trgal} Services^{Com.mittee, ,has identifred the parties and submitteda} report,^{dated 07} 'Oa.2024^{and the same is placed on record'}

¶46

In view of^{the above, I'A'Nos'3 and 4 of 2024are allowed'} Consequently,^{this Criminal Petition isallou'eda ndthe} proceedings in^{C.C.No.6O0of 2023 on the file of V Aclditional} Metropolitan^{Magistrate, Medchal-MalkajgiriDistrict at}

¶47

¶48

L.B.Nagar against the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an arnount of Rs.S,OO0/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.S2 1g8 926279, State Bank of India, $hantinagar Branch (2OO7 Ol, IFSC Code : SBINOO20O7O, MICR Np.5OOQO4O17! and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees Five Thousand O.M to the Telangana High Court Advocares Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and frle proof of the same before the Registry.

¶49

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶50

closed.

¶51

Sd/- P. PAOMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY//

¶52

SE TION OFFICER

¶53

To,

¶54

l.TheVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate,Medchal-MalkajgiriDistrictatLB Nagar

¶55

2.TheVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate-cum.lAdditionalJuniorCivilJudge' - Uppat, Medchal Malkajiliri District at LB Nagar

¶56

The Station^{HouseOfficer, Ghatkesar PS' RachakondaDistrict}

¶57

Two ccs to the^{Public Prosecutor, Highcourt for the state of Telangana'} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶58

One CC to Sri^{S Chandra Mohan Reddy' Advocate IOPUCI}

¶59

One CC to^{Sri N Yashwanth, Advocate [OPUCI}

¶60

Two CD CoPies

¶61

Along with a^{copy of JointMemo of Compromise}

¶62

Note: Total Amount^{of Rs.10,000/-( RupeesTen thousand only ) has been paid by} SriChandraMohanReddy,CounselforthePetitionersasdirectedbytheHon,ble Courtvideorderdated13-08-2024asRs.5,0001(RupeesFivethousandonly)to theDirector,sainikwelfare,Hyderabad,andRs.5,00oi-(RupeesFivethousand only ) to^{the Telangana High Court Advocates Association' Hyderabad and filed} Memo as^{proo{ of cornpliance USR No' 96978 ol 2024 dated A4-1O'2O24'}

HIGH^COURT

DATED:1310812024

COMMON^ORDER

l.A. Nos.^{3 and 4 of 2O24}

¶67

( oR THE Si4 Ie
oo \a
0 E Jrl\l 2025 n
eQ, .c)
t)tSt' 4 r CHan t

¶68

in / and

¶69

GRLP.No.4610^{ot 2024}

¶70

ALLOWING^{THE CRLP AND}

¶71

l.A. Nos.^{3 and 4 of 2024}

og(o'l \o tr-.

i I I l i I I I

Q.'-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANAGANA AT :: HYDERABAD

¶77

crl.-p. No.'QCWof 2024

¶78

Between: -

¶79

1 Bandaru Ramesh Babu S/o. Late Ramulu Aged 35 years, Oc'c.: privet Employee, !yo..F]at^{No..5Q!,V-inayaka Hills, phase-I,} loqd^{N9. l, Almasguda,BN Reddy,} Hyderabad N,/o..H. No. 4-244, Gottigundalapa lem, -

¶80

Kondapuram,(M), Nellore Dist. A.p.

¶81

2 Bandaru Padmavathi ffo. late Ramulu Aged 60 years, Occ.: House wife, R/o. H. No. 4-244, Goftigundalapalem, Kondapr.iram (M); NElloie Dist. A.p.

¶82

3 Koppalli Sudharshani Wo. Nagendra Babu, Aged^z[0 years, Oic.: HousE wiie, R/o. .H. No. 4-244, Gottigunda.lapalem, Kondapuram (M),:Nellore Dist. A.p.

¶83

....^{petitioner/Accused} No. 1to 3

¶84

''..

¶85

AND

¶86

The State of Tele-ngana.; Rep. by public prosecutor, High Coud ofTelangan at Hyderabad.

¶87

2 Smt Kukkapalli Aruiiavathamma W/o Srinivas Naidu, Age: 53yrs, Caste: K.amma (Chowdhary), R/o: Atmakur, Nellore, Andhra^pradesh - 524322.

¶88

ResPondents \1-oD

¶89

JOINT .srnrmrriieo BY PETITIONERS / RESPOND ENTS NO.2

¶90

It is submit that the De-facto complainant herein against the Petitioners before the Ghatkgsari police station, for the offence under section 498-4, 3 and 4 of Dp Act and in FIR NO 27O of 2023 later the police filed charge sheet was filed vide C.C. No. 6O0 OF 2023 On the file of Hon'ble V Additional Metropotitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Lb. Nagar.

¶91

-#krv) ''<--2 (c $. ^tn"v

¶92

/\o

¶93

It is submitted^{that the d} efacto complainant^{and respondents} 2) /Accused^{No1to 3, along with their elders participatedin the} mediation at^{the instanceof theirfamily, personsand well wishers} and came to^{an amicable settlement and both have agreedfor} settling the^{said issue in the form of} 9omOrym!1e^{and enter Deedof} settlement^{on 19 O4.2O24,as per the trgmi.es'angconditions of said} Deed of settlement ,^{they took Decreeof Mu!931Cgnsenton dated'} tg.o4.2o24fromHon,bleAddl.Farnily.Cou.rtRangaReddyvide F.C.o.P.No.^{76L of 2023} ,^{as peltl"ie terms a'nd conditions of said} DeedofsettlementtheRespondeit/Acc!.'Eed..No.-lwaspaidan amount of^{Rs. 7,oo,ooo/-laupe} .es^{'..!9v.9ri''lakhs only) to} Petitio ner/De-facto^{complainant through'by4ray of DD No'508806} dt.18.O4.2024^{toivards full and final settlementof their marital} disputes.

¶94

It is^{submittedthat Petitioner/De-factocomplainanthave} decided to^{withdrawthe criminal case filed against the Respondent} No. t to 3^{vide C.C. No. 600 OF 2023 On the file of Hon'ble V} Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate,Medchal Malkajgiri Districtat Lb'} Nagar for the^{offence under section498-A, IPCand 4 and 3 of DP Act} and Petitioner/d^{efactocomplainant'have no interestto proceed for} farther in the^{said case against the respondentsNo' 1 to 3} '^and Petitio ner/defa^{cto complainantcompromised the said case as per} the terms^{and conditions of the Deedof settlementon t9 'O4'2024'}

¶95

It submitted^{that Petitioner/defacto complainant have no} 4) objection for^{quashingthe C.C' No, 60Q OF 2023On the file of} Hon,ble V^{Additional Metropolitan t\4agistrate,Medchal-Malkajgiri} District at Lb.^{Nagarfor the offence under'section498-A'IPC and 4} and 3 of^{DP Act against the respondents No'1 to 3 '}

¶96

It is^{submittedthat the petitioner/defcatocomplainant} confirms^{that all his claims have been fully and finalty satisfied and} he will not^{claim,any furthgr amount againstthe respondent'}

lkaz-'\ lL-

1l-

It is respectfufly submit !.!aq T,!e petitioner sand de_facto complainant have setued the diSpdte amicabry at the intervention of elders and well wishers, and the matter has been compromised between them hence the Ooitr partiei are come to compromise the proceedings in Charge sheet C,C. .No. 600 OF ZO23 On the file of Hon'ble V Additional Metropolitan,,Magistrate, Medchal_Malkajgiri District at Lb. Nagar for thd offence under section 49g_A, IpC and 4 and 3 of DP Act and record the. compromise and quash the proceedings in the above charge, sfreet and the parties have no claims or rights against each other in the future.

¶101

COUNSEL FO P ITION R PETITIONERS 1.8 2. b x#L 3' K .i.X Eaa"9WU1 COUNSEL R RESPONDENT 2"d RESpoNDENT LL A'z,^T-J'fh*^$n

¶102

"9WU1 COUNSEL R RESPONDENT

Bandaru Ramesh Babu v. The State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandaru Ramesh Babu v. The State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Kiran Kumar Atluri Vs State of Telangana

Anandasi Ravi Babu@Babu. Vs Chidumula Venkatreddy

Manuka Mallesham Vs The State of Telangana

Jogam Saidulu Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd.Yousuf Vs The State Of Telangana

Kanakarajusai Prakash Iyer Vs State of Telangana