The petitioner sought to quash an FIR. The Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet had been filed, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3385 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THEFOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMTNAL PETITION NO:28180F 2024
Between:
Nagarakunta Naveen Reddy,S/o Verrkatram R.eddy, Aged 42-yeal?,.Occ Agilultr;e, R/" 7-tolR,tr,trniloipallyVillage, Nandigama Mandal, R R'Dist '
... PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
Petition under section482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of criminalPetition, the High court may be pieased to call for the recordspertaining to FIR No.16412024 d1.27.02-2024 with i,S Shadnag"r,Ranga Reddy District and quash the same'
t.A. NO :1 OF2O24
Petition undersection482 of ct.P.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of criminalPetition,the High court may-be pi;r.;J to stay att furtherproceedingsFIR No.164t2o24dt.27lO2l2O24 with PS Shadnagar, RangaReddY District.
This Petition coming onfor hearing, upon perusing the ltilemorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriKANUMUR| KALYANI, Advocatefor the Petitioner and Assistant PublicProsecutor state of Telangana onbehalf of the RespondentNo'1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the followihg:ORDER:'
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K, SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.28 18 of 2o24
ORDER
The present Crimir-ral petition is l-ileci seekrng the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against thr: pc,,itioners rn Crime No.164 of 2024 r_rf Shadnagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate.
.J. Recortling tlr said subrnission, -the Cr.inrinal petition .is dismissed as infructuous gran ting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh petil.ion in case the cause survives.
As a sequel; rniscellaneous petitions penditrg, if any, shali
stand closed
Sd/- MOHD ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
L{
SECTION OFFICER
To,
VGS
w
i J I I I
I I I I
HIGH COURT
SKSJ
DATED:04/1012024
ORDER
.i EL.4
a.
_,;
,-^,r o,<br>(,:.: :l
, .1,
s -fr4
<br>a
CRLP.No.2818 of 2024
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED.
(Ccd4
Yr-
r-Y
{,'{
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for quashing the FIR should be entertained after the filing of the charge sheet?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagarakunta Naveen Reddy
State of Telangana
Pathlavath Srinu
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
