notes were hanrled over to respondent No.2 on 09. 10.2014 but remained unpaid. Respondent No.2 along with G.Naresh and J.Mahender approached the petitioner and his wife on 12.O4.2015 and 15.10.2015 and demanded Rs.77,50,000/- by virtue of promissory notes dated 16.O2.2076 but the ac,:used and his wife sought trme to pay the money. On repeated denrands, the accused issued <heque bearing No.5652 1O, dated 25.0(r.2O18 for Rs.4B,00,OO0/-, cheque Nos.656 134 and 656 135 dated 25.06.2018 of Rs.4,O0,000/- each drawn on the State Bank of Hyderabad, Hal.:eempet Branch, Shameerpet MandeLl, Ranga Reddy District and the accused and his wife gave two cheques bearing Nos.437590 and 437591 dated 25.06.i>.O18 for Rs.4,00,000/- each drawn on LD.B.l. Bank, Basrheerbagh Bralch, Hyderabad. On presentation, these cheqtres were returned dishonoured for the reason refer to drawer ald payment stopped on 1O.08.2018 and 07.O7.2018. Then, respon<lent No.2 hled private conrplaint under Section 2OO of Cr.p.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 42O of I.p C. before the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Ranga Reddy District which is :eferred for investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. which is registered as Crime No.256 of 2018 against the petitioner and his wife and the same is pending.
