Disposed

Munnaluri Shashi Kashyap v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Feb 2024CRLP/1846/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a CRLP seeking speedy disposal of Special Court proceedings. The Court directed the original trial court to conclude the trial within three months from receipt of the order.

What did the court decide?

The trial Court directed to conclude the trial and dispose of the S.C. as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three (03) months.

Munnaluri Shashi Kashyap Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

I I 1 I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR^-'

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIM]NAL PETITION NO: 18.15 oF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Munnaluri Shashi Kashvan .9/o v.- V_enkatarama Rao Aged about 24 vears. 86";g.rr,ovee^{R/o H.' ruo. s+-b5ri;t!;;'6rtd;r stadium, oorrasudi,}

¶9

..Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

1 Iffi":rH?^{of relangana. Rep bv its Public Prosecutor, HighcourtBtdgs,}

¶12

Respondent No. 1

¶13

Ravula Sushma. D/o R..Raju Aged about 24 years, Occ: Student, R/o H. No. 20-e3t123t8, New Ram Nrt;; i;t".y 6i;r[]riiar, uppar.

¶14

...Respondent No. 2/De facto Complainant

¶15

Petition under section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds "i cri,ii"li'i;"tition, the High court may be pleased to ca, for the records rerating to pio*lihg. in s.c. No. 204 ot 2019 on the fire of Hon'bre soeciar sessronsirofii"i rr-"r of cases under scs and srs (PoA) Act. Ranga ireddv District, At L. "R lirs"i on the fire of p s Uppar for the offences under Sec. nZO, +SS, .StA fZj t"l iitlrc, Sec. 3 (2) (v) of SC ST (POA) Act and quash the same as illegal.

¶16

l.A. NO:2O F 2024

¶17

Petition under Section _4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds "i crriiili'i!"tition, the High court may be preas€d to stav a, the further fro""LJi.tg'l'iii'il'i. o. ,oo or zolson the fire of Hon'bte Special sessions Judge for Tri;t-o; C"J"" ,rra". SCs & STs (pOA) Act. Ranga Reddy District,^at^!: e- Nrjr. i.-il"" fite of p S Uppat for the offences under Sec. 42o. 4s3, ]76 (2) triipCi ie-c. 3 (2) (v) of SC ST (pOA) Act including the appearance of the petiiionerAccu-.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kiran Palakurthi, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and for the Respondent No. 2 none appeared.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT. JUSTICE K' SUJANA} c AL PE^{TITIONNo.1E46 of 2024}

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Criminal^{Petitionis liled under Section 482 of the Code} of Criminal^{Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr'P'C'J by the petitioner'who} is arrayed^{as accused' seeking to quash the proceedings against him} in S.C.No.^{2O4 of 2Ol9 on the Frle of leamedSpecialSessionsJudge} for Trial^{of CasesunderSC/ STs(POA)Act' Ranga ReddyDistrictat} L.B.Nagar.

¶23

lrarned^{counselfor the petitioner confinedhis prayeronlyto} the extent^{of speedydisposal of the S'C'}

¶24

Hence,^{considering the limited grievanceof the petitionerand} considering^{the fact that the originarS.C.pertainsto the year 2019,} the trial^{Courtis directed to concludethe trial anddispose of the S'C'} as expeditiously^{as possible preferably within a periodof three (03)} months^{from the dateof receipt of a copyof this order'}

¶25

Accordingly,^{the Criminal Petition is disposed of'Pending} miscellaneous petitions, if^{any, in this Criminal Petition shallalso}

¶26

sD'-v . KAV tT, A stand^closed. R ASSISTAN^{T REGIS} CER ,TTRUE^COPY'/ SECTION

¶27

To,

¶28

1 .^{TheSpecial Court for the Trialof SCs andSTs (POA)Act Cyberabad'At L' B} :l*'

¶29

;ti:1;'a'#3[-:,Y#l.[':HfrYj.:il"H:il'1'Yaxll'j'f I trgslilran^{Patarunni'Advocate[oPUc]}

5.^{TWo cD &ples}

HIGH COURT

) I

DATED: 19tO2t2O24

ORDER

CRLP.No.184G of 2024

( ()F 1HE s14 i€
io (:(
to
15 APfr 2024
o
'+
t *
?6 )
sr,4rcnt-o )

¶38

DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶39

8.pC'b #r"

¶40

Munnaluri Shashi Kashyap v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munnaluri Shashi Kashyap v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mende Bejamma Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Hamza Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Aslam Vs The State of Telangana

Akula Sandeep Vs Akula @ Kodijuttu Bhuvaneshwari Devi

Modem Arun Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Sharfuddin Vs The State of Telangana