Disposed

Bhukya Ravi Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Jan 2024CRLP/17/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail regarding an ancestral property dispute, the High Court observed that the petitioner was not specifically implicated. The Court directed law enforcement to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Supreme Court guidelines before arrest and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

No bail granted; petitioner directed to cooperate with investigation and appear as required; directions issued for police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C.

Bhukya Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

132511

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:^'17 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bhukya Ravi Kumar, S/o. Bhukya Harilal, Age 20^{years, Occ. StudentR/o-} H.No. 1-145, Bothala Parre, Tharigoppula Mandal, Jangaon^District

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.¹

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Through Tharigoppula P.S., Jangaon^{Districtrep. by} its Public Prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana^{at Hyderabad}

¶12

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Courtmay} be^pleased to enlarge the^{petitioner/accusedNos.1 on bail in the event of his} arrest in Crime.No.1 18 of 2023 of Tharigoppula PS, Jangoan^{District in the} interest of^justice and pass

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri N.N} SOMENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the^{Public Prosecutoron} behalf of the Respondent

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

¶17

?I I II

¶18

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17 OF 2O24

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

1, This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner/Accused No. I seeking bail in the event ol his arrest in connection with Crime No. t 18 of 2023 on thc file o1-Tharigoppula Police Station, Jangoan District, registered lor thc offences under Sections 419,42O,467, 468, 471 and 506 r/rv.34 of IPC.

¶22

f-leard lcarncd counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Pr-rl;lic Prosecutor for the respondent-State and peruscd the rccord.

¶23

A Tclrrgu u.ritten complaint was hled on 07 .O9.2O23 alleging that in rcspect of ancestor's property, this petitioner and others haue inclulged in fabricating the documents. pinta facie,^{it appezrrs that disputes} between the famiiy members with respcct ro properties had resulted in the prescnt co m plzrin r.

¶24

Since it is not specihcally mentioned against this pe[itioncr I lta r hr is complicit in forging any documents, thc Policc arc rlirc(.rc.l to follow the procedure laid down under

¶25

¶26

Section 41-A^{Cr.P.Cand also the guidelinesformulated by the} Hon'ble Supreme^{Court in ArneshKumar v' Sto:teof Biharr} scrupulously.^{The petitionershall co-operatewith the} lnvestigating^{Officerand shall appear before the Investigating} olficcr as^{and when required for the purpose of investigatior-r'}

¶27

With the said^{observation,the Criminal Petitionts} .disposed off. Miscellaneous^{applications' if any pendingin this} criminal^{pctition, shall stand closed'}

¶28

orr,""#S'c:3'E+iiR //TRUE COPY// ,I

¶29

¶30

SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To, llx,?ttJt'H:'F3fl:'E?.I:3[l?;,:"i!L'3ffi^{?:?'lf, :'s:13:Yel3:'l;:'","} Hvderabad [OUTI 3 ijl,"""cCiJs'ar^{tt'tt sotrleruoRAREDDY,Advocate loPuc]} 4. Two CD CoPies

VIIiSI'

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0410112024

ORDER

G stAr &
{
q v
o
o I I JAN 202[
at
t OFS Da-(C t"

CRLP.No.17 ot 2024

DISPOSING OF THE

CRIMINAL PETITION

Bhukya Ravi Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhukya Ravi Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Hanmanth Rao Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

M/s.Ge Godavari Engineering Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Purshotham Mallaiah Vs the State of Telangana

Konda Srinivas Vs State of Telangana

Mukesh Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Kalla Ramu Vs The State of Telangana