Disposed

Shaik Jani Babu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Feb 2024CRLP/1344/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court on 06.02.2024, disposed of Criminal Petition No. 1344 of 2024 seeking discharge/quashing. The court dispensed with the petitioners' appearance before the trial court, subject to counsel representation, and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Dispensed with the appearance of petitioners before the trial court; criminal petition disposed of; pending miscellaneous petitions in the criminal petition closed.

Shaik Jani Babu Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

'' 1 "1':

¶2

t^338s I

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

$,.4# .:1 'ff,ffi

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1344 OF 2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

1.Shaik Jani Babu, S/o. Sharfuddin, Age57^years,OccGovt. Employee,^R/o.H.
No.1-6-141143/1,NearRaman School,SriRamNagar Colony,Suryapet Town andDistrict
2.ShaikShaheen,Wo.JaniBabu,Age52^years,OccHousehold,^{Rl/o.H. No.1-}
6-14114311,NearRamanSchool, Sri Ram Nagar Colony,SuryapetTown and District

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Nos2&3' D
'1.The State ofTelangana,,Representedthroughits Public Prosecutor, High Court fortheState ofTelangana,Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT NO.1/RESPONDENT
2.Shaik Shabhana,,^\NtoAzhar,Age^{34 years,}Occ^{Household,Rl/o.C/o. Dio.} ShaikJanimiya,H. No. 3-12-315/2/1,^{Rajeevnagar, Suryapet Town and District}
...RESPONDENTNO.2/PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to^quash the^{proceedings in D.V.C No. 22 of 2023 on the file of the} learned Addl. Judicial^{lr,lagistrateof First Class, Suryapet.}

¶15

I.A NO: 2OF 2024

¶16

Petition under Section 482^{of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Courtmay} be pleased to stay all^{further proceedings in D.V.CNo. 22 of 2023 on the file of} the learned Add-|. Judicial^{Magistrate of First Class,Suryapet,including} appearance of the^{petitioners, pendingdisposal of the mainquash petition, in the} interest of^justice.

¶17

¶18

FEqrytr -,i. ,

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SURYA;, BALU IVAHENDRA ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Addl.Public Prosecutor -t: (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared e for the Respondent ! No.2.

¶20

. i4--r. r' rtt- x r hi-+",:. .Xr{tt1 '{ffifⁱ

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

'. . ar' :.....^{, .} . ;' il.:

¶23

'Lt- i
i
r*,. :
.El1,fii.i

¶24

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶26

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1344 of 2o24

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

In this criminal petition, the petitioners, who are respondent Nos.2 and 3, seek to quash the proceedings against them in D.V.C. No. 22 of 2023 pending on the hle of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Suryapet.

¶29

After arguing for some time, when this Court has expressed its opinion stating that the said contentions are disputed questions of fact which need to be gone into by the trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioners restricled his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the trial Court.

¶30

Hence, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specihcally required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of petitioners being represented by their counsel on every date of hearing.

¶31

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal Petition shall aiso

¶32

stand closed.

¶33

EKHAR^RAO SD/. N.^CHANDRAS R ASSISTANT

//TRUE^COPY//

ICER. SECTIO

To,

1.^{The Addl. J}

2.^{One CC to} 3.^{Two CC to} ;}iitrflt'$.lif,r"***:*':s:: at Hyderab ad [OUTI

¶39

Two^{CD CoPies}

¶40

of^Telangana

^or^tal{

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:OGI02l2o24

ORDER

CRLP.No.1344 ot 2024

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL^PETITION

¶49

e 1HE SI4 /€
o
o
]>
? 2t nm 2n7a C)
A

O5
HEO

¶50

..,:
j;
t,

¶51

iitri:t
:;?.s;.r:' i
',:-:f r;:.

Shaik Jani Babu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Jani Babu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bodapatla Sreenidh Vs The State of Telangana

Paidi Lakshmi Pathy Vs The State of Telangana

Kadavath Santhosh Naik Vs The State of Telangana

Durga Reddy Mekala Vs The State of Telangana

Jonnalagadda Bhaskar Reddy, And 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana

Tirukovela Venkat Raja Vs The State of Telangana