Allowed

Prakash Arsid v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Sept 2024CRLP/10234/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Before Justice K. Sujana, the High Court of Telangana entertained a petition seeking a direction to the trial court to first dispose of a subpoena petition (C.M.P. No. 477 of 2022) before dismissing the main Domestic Violence case. The Court directed the trial court to disposal of the subpoena petition on merits followed by expeditious disposal of the DV case.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the trial court to dispose of Crl.M.P. No. 477 of 2022 on merits before disposing of D.V.C. No. 8 of 2020.

Prakash Arsid Vs The State of Telangana — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF^SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETI TION^{NO:10234OF2024}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Prakash Arsid, S/o. Umakanth^{Rao Arsid, Occ.Unemployed, agedabout 39 years,} nyo. t-t.t to.s-a-70/1 ,^{Bhavani colony,Near lndira ReddyPark, Rajendranagar,} R'R'District

¶8

... Petitioner/Respondent^No'1 AND

¶9

'l . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

¶10

Smt. Preethi Kartan,^{Wio. PrakashArsid,Aged 36 years,Occ'Private} Employee (MNC)

¶11

Prathik Arsid, S/o.^{PrakashArsid, aged about10 years,Occ' Student, (Being} - ttitinor. Reoresented bv his mother-Smt.Preethi Kartan) Both R/o' H'No'31' n-r.ro.+-rzloot. Road No.10,^{DwarakamaiNagar, Vanasthalipuram'} R.R.District

¶12

...Respondent No.2 &^{3/Petitioners}

¶13

Petition under Section^{528 of B.N.S.S. (old uis 482oI Cr.P.C,) praying that} in the circumstances stated^{in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition,} the High court^may be^{pleased to directthe Learned Vll AdditionalJudicial} Magistrate of First Class,^{Ranga Reddy District, at. Hayathnagarthat before} proceeding the main DVC No.B of^{2020, may be directed to dispose off the} CH.M.P.No. 477 of^{2o22,in DVC No.B of 2o2o, tiled by the petitionerU/s.91} crPC to summon and^{produce the documents mentionedin the petition therein.}

¶14

This Petition coming on^{for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of} Grourtds of criminal Petition^{and upon hearingthe argumentsof sri K Sai Babu,} Advocate for the Petitioner^{and Sri Arun Kumar Doddla,Addl. Public Prosecutor} (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and^{none appeared for the Respondent} No.2 & 3.

¶15

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

¶16

{ t

¶17

3 I

¶18

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶19

CTUMIN^{AL PETITIONNo.1O234of2024}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Crimina:l^{letition is frled under Section 528 of the Bharatiya} Nagarik Suraksha^{Sanhita,2023 (for shorttsNSSJ bythe} petitioner/respondent^{No.1requestingthe courtto direct the tria-l court to} dispose of the crl.M.I,.No.477^{of 2022 in D.V.C.No.Bof 2O2O pending on the} file of the learned^{vli Additional Judicial Magistrateof First class,Ranga} Reddy District, at Ha)^athnagar.

¶22

Heard Sri K.Sai Babu,^{Iearned counselfor the petitionerand Sri Arun} Kumar Doddla, learn:d^{Additional Public Prosecutorfor respondentNo. 1 -} State. Perused the re:ord'

¶23

Learned counst:l for^{the petitioner submitted that Crl'M P'No 477 of} 2022 in D.V.C.No.S^{01'2020is filed beforethe trial court underSection91 0f} cr.p.c. to summon^{and produce the documents mentionedin the petition.} Hence, he prayed this^{Court to direct the trial Court to disposeof the} Crl.M.P.No.477 of 2022^{beforedisposingof D.V.C'No.8of 2O2O'}

¶24

In view of the^{submissionmade by the learned counsel for the} petitioner, this courl deems it^{fit and proper to direct the trial courtto} dispose of the Crl.l\LP.No.477^{of 2022 on merits before disposingthe} D.V.C.No.8 of 2020. Further^{directedto disposeof D.V'C.No.8 of 2020 as} expeditiously as Possible.

Accordingly, the Crirninal Petition is disposed of.

¶30

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

¶31

Sd/. V. HARI^P AD ASSISTANT^REGIS

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

The^{Addl.Metropolitan SessionJudge' Cyberabad'Rangareddy District'}

¶36

The^{Vll Additional Judicial Magistrateof FirstClass' Ranga Reddy District'at} Hayathnagar.

¶37

The XIV^{Addl. MetropolitanMagistrate' Cyberabad at Hayathnagar'}

¶38

One^{CC to Sri. K Sai Babu Advocate [OPUC]'}

¶39

Two^{CCs to PublicProsecutor'High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]'}

¶40

Two CD^CoPies.

YfR /gh

HIGH COURT

DATED:0310912;024

ORDER

CRLP.No.10234^{of 2024}

¶47

/:-a-
,.. 'j-rt lE S14
./'r'.
/ "
)
I
; ir r!U ! ),
?024
,.1 Aa
{+
*a) .(j r r)
::::.:'

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE CRL.P.

¶49

OcTq

¶50

0
<br>

Prakash Arsid v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Arsid v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Bal Raj Vs the State of Telangana

Banala Naresh Vs State of Telangana

Bandanadam Frances Vs The State of Telangana

Harijan Gopal, Vs The State of Telangana

Orusu Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

The State of Telangana Vs Sayyad Lalu @ Lamiya