Disposed

Ghousia Begum, Mahabubnagar Dt., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Telangana HC29 Oct 2024CRLA/1167/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal appeal against a conviction was closed after the State reported that the appellant had been granted remission under G.O.Ms.No.32 dated 02.02.2024 and released from jail on 02.07.2024, and counsel confirmed she did not wish to prosecute the case further.

What did the court decide?

Criminal appeal closed as appellant was released on remission; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Ghousia Begum, Mahabubnagar Dt., Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2024)

[^341s1

i I t I

I i ! I i

oF TELANGANA rN rHE^HIGH "orIf3$o',Jtot"t#E

¶5

TUESDAY,^{THETWENTY NINTH DAY OF OC_TOBER} '"*"rwb rnbusAND AND rwENw FouR

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER} ot? o*'t KUMAR JUKANTI THE HON'BLE^{SHRI JUSTI}

¶8

CRIMIN^{AL APPEAL NO:1167of 2015}

¶9

Appeal^{under Section 374(21 of Cr'P C aggrieved by the Judgment dated} 14-09-2015^{in S.C No'768 of 2O13on the file of the Courtof the lll Additional} District^{and SessionsJudge, Ranga Reddy District"}

¶10

Between:

¶11

#"f^{vfif i:ff'I,'ff} '{fs}'dilH"in} tfr Hl",E,;iltr.,tz:s;ffi

¶12

...ApPellant

¶13

AND

¶14

The State^{of Telanganarep' by the PublicProsecutor' High Court at Hyderabad}

¶15

..Respondent

¶16

Counsel^{for the Appellant: Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella}

¶17

Gounsel^{for the Respondent:} '^{Sri Arun Kumar-Dodla} Additional^{Public Prosecutor}

¶18

The Court^{delivered the following:JUDGMENT}

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SURENDER AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI cRIMINAL APPEAL No.1167 0F 201s

¶21

JUDGMENT: (per Hon,ble Sri Justice KSurender)

¶22

Learned Additiona_l public prosecutor for the State submits th at the appellant was granted remission uide G.O.Ms.No.3Z , dated. O2.O2.2024, and released from jail.

¶23

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is not inclined to prosecuterthe case, since she was granted remission artd was already released from jail on 02.o7.2024.

¶24

Recordrng the said submission, the criminal appeal stands clost:cl_

¶25

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Appeal shall stand closed.

¶26

/ITRUE COPY"

¶27

Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JO|NT FEGISTRAR --..' ;'l\ SEqfION OFFICER

¶28

To,

¶29

1 The lll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy^District.

¶30

2 The Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

¶31

The lnspector of Police, RGI Airport, Shamshabad.

¶32

4 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana^at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶33

One CC to Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella, Advocate [OPUC]

¶34

Two CD Copies

Karn/gh

V\ k

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911012024

JUDGMENT

CRLA.No.1167 ot 2015

1HE Sf4y t
cA
q
o J 3 fl 0EC 2il4 (I
* o{ 5p411-'.ttr

¶42

THE CRIMINAL APPEAL IS CLOSED

¶43

(

Ghousia Begum, Mahabubnagar Dt., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghousia Begum, Mahabubnagar Dt., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Farzana Sultana Vs the State of Telangana

The State of a.P., Vs Uyyalakadi Lingavva

The State of Telengana Vs Rakasi Narendar Reddy

Shaik Qasim, Warangal Dist. Vs The State of Telangana

Penchala Raju (A-1) Godavarikhani and 2 Otrs., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Kolipaka Ramesh, Warangal Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd