Sri R.Prakash v. Sri. Dr.S.Harish, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier order directing consideration of a land mutation application. Finding the application procedurally defective, the court permitted a fresh application and directed the respondent to pass reasoned orders within four weeks of submission.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to file fresh application; respondent directed to pass reasoned order within four weeks.
What the court decided
[32s6 ]
i I I I I I I
IN TI-TE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE EIGHTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENWFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE C.V' BHASKARREDDY
CONTEMPT CASENO: 898 0F 2023
Petition undersections10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act 1971 praying that in the circurnstancesstated in the affidavitfile hereinthe High court may be- ;i";r"dd i;punishthe Respondent undersections10 to 12 of the contempt of 6"rrt" n"t, lsilltor his willfui and deliberate disobedience of the Order passedby tf,e ion'Ofe HighCourtin W.P.No.31576of 2O22, daled 04'08 2022'
Between:
Sri R.Prakash,S/o. Late Raiappa,Aged about 70 years'Occ Business'Rl/o' i.i.to.il+-szoli 3,Basanth N-a!ar colonv, Hvderabad'
..'Petitioner
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's failure to pass orders on the mutation application amounts to wilful disobedience of the court's directive?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri R. Prakash
- respondent
Sri. Dr. S. Harish
Coram
C.V. Bhaskarreddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/898/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court