Repaka Laxmi Narayana v. Dr. Priyanka Ala, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt case filed alleging violation of a High Court order directing reference of a land compensation dispute and deposit of amounts. The court closed the contempt case pending determination of rights in a related petition but allowed a fresh application if the compensation is not deposited subsequently.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed pending the outcome of O.P. No. 14 of 2024 regarding the deposit of compensation and costs.
What the court decided
[32e61
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 337 OF 2024
Contempt Case under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act,'1971 to punish the Respondents herein for their willful, deliberate and wanton disobedience to the legitimate orders of this Court dated 16.1'l .2023 passed in W.P.No.9626 of 2023.
Between:
Repaka Laxmi Narayana, S/o. Late Narsaiah, aged about 75 years, Occ. Retired Post Master, R/o. H. No. 6/2215, Sai Nagar, Old bus depot road, Kothagudem District, Bhadradri Kothagudem.
...Petitioner
AND
1 . Dr. Priyanka Ala, lAS, District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court which dismissed the contempt petition should also decide if the respondents complied with the interim order directing reference to the authority and deposit of compensation.
Whether the learned Government Pleader's submission that compensation determination is pending before another proceeding justifies closing the contempt case but leaving costs liability open.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Repaka Laxmi Narayana
- respondent
Dr. Priyanka Ala
- respondent
Mr. M. Mangilal
- respondent
Mr. Raghava Reddy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/337/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court