Dismissed

Baddela Buddaiah v. Sri Naveen Mittal, IAS

Telangana HC1 Mar 2024CC/106/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in Telangana, hearing a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, recorded the respondent's compliance with previous High Court orders in W.P. No. 649 of 2022. The court concluded that no further orders were required and closed the case.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

Baddela Buddaiah Vs Sri Naveen Mittal, IAS — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶5

CQNTEMPT CASE NO: 106OF 2024

¶6

Contempt case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish respondent for his willfully and deliberately violating orders of the High Court dated. 26-04-2023 passed in W.P.No. 649 ot 2022.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Baddela Buddaiah, S/o Yellaiah Age 70 years, Occ Agriculture (Claimant No 15) Rl/o Kondapuram H/o Ghacpur Village P A Palli Mandal Nalgonda District

¶9

Dosapati Narsimha, S/o late D Saraiah, Age 56 years, Occ Agriculture (LR of Claimant No 4) R/o Kondapuram H/o Ghanpur Village P A Palli Mandal Nalgonda District.

¶10

Dosapati Muttamma, w/o late D Venkataiah Age 40 years, Occ Agriculture (Daughter-in-law of late Claimant No 4) R/o Kondapuram H/o Ghanpur Village P A Palli Mandal, Nalgonda Diskict.

¶11

Dosapati Kishore, S/o Late D Venkataiah Age 25 years, Oci Agriculture (Grand Son of late Claimant No 4) R/o. Kondapuram H/o Ghanpur Village P A Palli Mandal Nalgonda District.

¶12

...PETITIONERrwRIT PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

'1. Sri Navden Mittal, lAS, Princ'rp-al Secretary, Revenue Department State of Telangana, Secreteriat Building. Saifbad, Hyderabad.

¶15

Mr.B. Sriramulu, Land Acquisition Officer cum RDO, Devarakonda, Nalgonda

¶16

Mr.B. Chennaiah, Land acquisition Officer cum RDO, Miryataguda, Nalgonda

¶17

Mr. Sudershan Reddy, lAS, Managing Director, Hyderabad Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. LOKIREV PREETHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos^,l to 3: Gp FOR LAND AQUSITION counselfor the Respondent Nos:' c. NARENDER REDDysTANDtNc cousel FOR HMWS & SB

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

-f

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRI.IUSTICE K.SARATH}

¶23

CONTEMPT^{CASENo.106oF 20.24}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel^{for the petitioners submits that} the respondents^{compliedthe orders passed by this} Court in^{W.P.No.649of 2022'dated 26'M'2O23'In} view of the^{same, no further orders are required to be} passed in this^{ContemPtcase'}

¶26

Recording^{the aforementioned submission'the} Contempt^{Case is closed' There shalt be no orderas}

¶27

to costs.

¶28

As sequel^{to it,MiscellaneousPetitions,if anY}

¶29

pending, shall^{stand closed'}

¶30

sd'- c hi EvPErlSf^E3lg+[kH

,ITRUE^COPY"

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

,?!,);',f":j,XS?!S?iBIllSiBliSS?t",l3lrft?E[::o"o"rtmentStateor

¶35

Mr.B.^{Sriramulu, Land AcquiiitionOfficer cumRDO' Devarakonda'Nalgonda}

¶36

Mr.B.^{Chennaiah, Land acquisition Officercum RDO' Miryalaguda'Nalgonda}

¶37

Metro wate^r

¶38

4 M r^{s u d ersh?n Reddy,} l::iJ:ftHr,,'LXBff t"r,a 5lg?ii o "d SuPPIY^{andSewerage ts}

¶39

One^{CC to Sri. Lokirev PreethamReddy' Advocate IOPUCI}

¶40

Two CCs to Land Acquisition, High Court^for the^{State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶41

One CCs to G. Narsimha Reddy, Standing Counsel^{For HMWS & SB} High Court for the State of Tdlangana at^Hyderabad. [OPUC]

¶42

Two CD Copies.

HIGH COURT

DATED: O1tO3t2OZ4

ORDER

CC.No.106 ot 2024

R 1 H E S fA r('
to
f(
0 6 I Pfl lril )
),.!tr:
* n',//
t
P Tc

¶49

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE \t^cf{ e4 Fr

¶50

)V 1

Baddela Buddaiah v. Sri Naveen Mittal, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baddela Buddaiah v. Sri Naveen Mittal, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Cheemakurthi Naga Raja Kumari Vs The State of Telangana

Ravanaveni Kanakaiah s/o Laxmi Narasaiah, Vs Gangalula Kamalakar

Vice President, Sri Sai Krishna Yadava Sangham, Adilabad Vs Dist Collector, Adilabad Dist and Another

Dandem Durgaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Pasula Chennamma Vs The State of Telangana

Devthadf Gnaneshwar Vs The District Collector