Appeal against a money suit decree; counsel for respondent informed the High Court that both appellants had died long back and none appeared for them. The appeal suit was dismissed as abated, with liberty to legal heirs to pursue remedies if cause survives. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13300I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
APPEAL SUIT NO: 407 OF 2009
Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 30-10-2008 made in O.S.No.'18 ot 2002 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Nirmal, Adilabad District.
Between:
...Appellants/Plai ntiffs
AND
Bashetti Laxmi Narsamma, Wo. Narsimulu, Occ:Household R/o- Budhwarpet, Nirmal Town, Adilabad District.
..:RespondenUDefendant
Counsel forthe Appellants : Sri S Niranjan Reddy( None appeared)
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri A Jagan
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
APPEAL SIIIT No.4OZ OF 2OO9
JUDGMENT:
None appeared for appellants
submits that he was informed that appellantNos.l and 2 passed awa5 long back.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneousapplications,if any,
shall stand closed.
)
,?$Pt'AlXfl'fi'iil
,/TRUECOPY"
li'
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
ADIUgh w
,'
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912024
JUDGMENT
AS.No.407 of 2009
]e lrt: s Trt t6
<br>Jl
0I JA{j l[r5
2
.,1
ll s.-r, T,jH *
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS
6
2.'/ ,
lt
I
b0
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahu Laxmi Narsamma
A.Sheshirekha
Bashetti Laxmi Narsamma
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
