Interlocutory applications in an arbitration application were considered. One was allowed, the other disposed of as no further order was required. The main arbitration application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Interlocutory applications disposed of; main application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Main Case No: Arbitration Application No.195 of 2024
PROCEEDING SHEET
| S. No. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03. | 25.10.2024 | CJ | |
| I.A.No.2 of 2024 In view of the order passed today in Arbitration Application No.195 of 2024, no further order is required in this interlocutory application. I.A. is disposed of accordingly. |
|||
| ___________ CJ (AAJ) I.A.No.3 of 2024 Mr. V.Seetharama Avadhani, learned counsel for the applicants. |
|||
| Mr. S.Bhooma Goud, learned |
|||
| counsel for respondent No.2. Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2024. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons assigned in I.A.No.3 of 2024, the same is allowed. |
|||
| ___________ CJ (AAJ) Contd… |
| Arbitration Application No.1 | 95 of 2024 |
|---|---|
| Arbitration Application | is dismissed |
| as withdrawn. | |
| (Vide Separate Order) | |
| (B/o.) KL |
CJ (AAJ)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
