The Single Judge of the Telangana High Court dismissed a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 seeking directions to police authorities to take action against specific individuals, finding the petitioner uninterested as no representation was made on the return date.
None; the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:8896 OF 2023
Between
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inactlon of the respondent No. 2 and 3 herein in taking action against the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and their constables pursuant to the wriften complaint dl. 14-2-2023 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 herein to act upon the complaint dt. 14-2-2023 and take action against the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 herein as per Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 herein to consider and take appropriate action pursuant to the complain dt. 14-2-2023, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. KARUNAKAR REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
I t
I I
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICEC.V. BTIASKAR REDDY
WRTTPE TITION No.8896 ot2023
ORDER:
This Writ Petitionhas been filed seeking to issue a direction to respondentNos.2 and 3 to take action against respondent Nos.4 and 5pursuant to petitioner'scomplaint dated 14.02.2023
On 13.06.2023, when the matterwas taken up, therewas no representation on behalf of thepetitioner.Therefore,the matter was directed to be listed on14.06.2023 underthe caption 'For Dismissal'. Today,when thematter is takenup in the moming session, learned counselrepresentingthe learned counsel on record has stated that there isinconvenienceto the learned counsel on record. In view of such submission, this Court has passed over the matter for makingappropriate representation. In the afternoon session,whenthe matteris taken up, there is no representationon behalfofthepetitioner. This shows that thepetitioneris not interested to prosecutethe
present Writ Petition.
CVL]R, J W P No ti896 o12023
.ti
2
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecutlon.
Misccllaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ( lo SECTION OFFICER
To,
J Two CD Copies
SB
GJP
eK
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410612023
ORDER
WP.No.8896 of 2023
o'r- t
a ,nt "
f.' .9 l>
+
5s C
t:
-)
,(
*\i<br>lrstu +
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSEGUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
(-
t-
6\t I
ZL<br>V\u
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be proceeded with when the petitioner failed to make representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Perelli Jyothi
The State of Telangana
The Director General of Police, State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Khammam District
Mr. Sridhar Goud
Mr. Prasad
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
