Allowed

Datla Satyanarayana v. The STate of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal

Telangana HC19 Dec 2023WP/4999/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed five writ petitions challenging land ceiling proceedings initiated against a dead person. Following a prior judgment, it held the proceedings void for lack of notice to the petitioners, who were recorded as pattadars and in possession. The impugned orders were set aside regarding the petitioners' specific extents of land.

What did the court decide?

The impugned proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were set aside insofar as they relate to the petitioners' lands in Mancherevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Re

Datla Satyanarayana Vs The STate of Andhra Pradesh… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I^s183 I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH^{DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶6

WRITPETITION Nos.4998 4999.5004^{5005 AND 5006 0F 2009}

¶7

WRIT PETITION No .4998 0F^2009:

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 . Datla Lakshmi Konda^{(Died as per LRsP2 to P6)'}

¶10

D. Anianeva Raiu. S/o. D. Satyanarayana^{Raiu' aged about62 years,.Occ:} Busini:ss,^{'FVo.l-i.No.47,VenkaiaSai Homes,Ngar Sri Chaitanya c;ollege'} Nizampe[, Ranga^{Reddy District, Telangana} -^50009O.

¶11

D. Venkateshwar Raiu,^{S/o. D. Satyanaqyqlq Rgitl' aged^about.} P^vSgT' Occ: Business, R/d.H.No.12-24261N32'^{UR Colony, opp. Llc Pad<'} Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad,^Telangana -^500028.

¶12

4 S. firlaniula. Wo. S.N. Varma, D/o.^{D. Satyanarayana Ralu,aged ab9{ q7} '' ;;;;. 6;i HoJsewite. Rvo. H.No.tz-z-826iN32, UR colonv, opp. Llc Park' tlehdipatnam, Hyderabad,^Telangana -^500028.

¶13

Lakshmi Tanuia Datla,^{D/o.D. Satyanarg-yqp} .$eiu^^{Datla, aged.qF'-t} ?3 - i.i[.' o"., Siuoent. -nyo. H.NI.12-2-8261N32, UR-colony, opp. LIC Park' irlehdipatnam, Hyderabad,^Telangana -^5OOO28.

¶14

Uma Tanmavi Datla, D/o.^{RamachandraRaiuDatla,aged about 23 years'} Occ: Student, Ryo. H.l,lo.12-2-8261N32'^{UR Colony'opp' Llu Paft,} Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad,^Telangana -^5OO028.

¶15

Petitioner Nos, 2 to^{6 are brought on record as LRs of thedeceased} i,;iiiil; x".t .i^{per Court orde-r dated19j2.2o23in l'ANo'1ot 2o22'}

¶16

...PETITIONER

¶17

ANO

¶18

' The State of Andhra Pradesh,^{Rep. by TheP-rincipal} 9gqet'a.ry ,to Government, Revenue^{(ULC)Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad'}

¶19

The Soecial Officer and Cornpetent^{Authority, Urban Land Ceiling' 3d Floor'} Chancjra Vihar,^{Mozam Jahi Market Road, Hyderabad.}

¶20

The District Collector,^{Ranga Reddy Dstricl,Lakdikapool, Hyderabad'}

¶21

The Mandal Revenue Officer,^{Raiendra Nagar Mandal,Attapur'Hyderabad}

¶22

¶23

Kolluri Krishna S/o. Late Kolluri Anjaiah, Age 68 years, Occ: Retd. Employee.

¶24

Kolluri Surya Prakash, S/o. Late K. Narsimha, Age 55 years, Occ: Business.

¶25

Kolluri Rambabu, S/o. Late K. Mallesh, Age 38 ye€rs, Occ: Business.

¶26

Kolluri Kailash, S/o. Late Sivraj, Age 35 years, Occ: Business. Respondent Nos.5 to 8 are Rl/o. Narsing Village, Rajendemagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 are impleaded as per Court Order dated 19.12.2023 in l.A.No.1 of 2016 (W.P.M.P.No.3810472016)

¶27

...RESPONDENTS

¶28

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriale Writ, Order or Direction of the like nature declaring the:-

¶29

(i) the Proceedings No.H1l277Ol20O6 dated 23-01-2006 (Section 8(1) orders) issued by the 2nd respondent;

¶30

(ii) the Proceedings No.H1/277012006 dated 16-03-2007 (Secrion B(4) orders) issued by the 2od respondent;

¶31

(iii) The order issued in Procs. No.H1/27tOl2OO6 dated 16-03-2007 (Statement under Section^g of the Act) issued by the 2nd Respondent;

¶32

(iv) Notification dated 21-06-2007 under Section 1O(1) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,^'1976 pubtished in A.p. cazette 187 on dated 23-06-2007;

¶33

(v) Notification dated 19{7-2007 under Section 1O(3) of Urban Land (Ceihng and Regulation) Act, 1976 published in A.p. Gazette No.22S on daled 24-07 -2OO7 i

¶34

¶35

(vi) Notbe dated O1{9-2007 in^{Proce€dingsNo.H1/277012OO6 under} Section 10(5) of Urban Land^{(Ceiling& Regulation)Act, 1976issuedby} the 2d Respondent;

¶36

(vii) order in Proceedings^{lb.H1t277Ot2OO6dated 02-02-2008 under section} 10(6) of Urban Land^{(Ceiling& Regulation)Act, 1976 issued by the 2d} Respondent;

¶37

issued on a dead^{person namely Hyder Ali Mirza as void ab-initio and non-est and} all the consequential ac{ions^{takenby the Respondent authorities pursuantto the} above said impugned^{orders in so far as the Petitioner'sland admeasuring Ac.1-} 48.5 cents or.599 Hectors^{in SurveyNos.478 Part,483 Part,485Part' 486Part} and 491 Part of^{MancherevulaVillage' Raiendranagar Mandal' Ranga Reddy} District as arbitrary,^{illegal, contrary to the provisionsof Urban Land (Ceilingand} Regulation) Act, 1976^{and violative of Article 14 of the Constitutionof lndia and} Principles of Natural Justice^{consequentlyset asideall the aboveimpugned} orders

¶38

l.A. NO: 1 OF^{2009{WPMP. NO:6 5460F20091}

¶39

PetitionUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, theHighCourt may be pleased to issue} interim directions to the^{Respondents herein not to dispossess the Petitionerfrom} the land admeasuring^{Ac.'l-48.5 cents or} '599^{Hectors in SurveyNos' 478 Part'} 483 Part, 485 Part,^{486Partand 491 Partof Mancherevula Vitlage, Rajendranagar} Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District, not to alienate/allot or sellthe same to third parties'} not to change the nature^{of the above said land bekmgingto the Petitioner} pending the disposal of the above^{Writ Petition'}

¶40

¶41

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt E. AJAY REDDY

¶42

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI HARENDER PERSHAD,

¶43

SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶44

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s to 8: SRI GOKULA RAMA RAO

¶45

WRIT PETITION No. 4999 0F 2009

¶46

Between:

¶47

Datla Satyanarayana, S/o.D.Purushotham Raju (Died as per LRs p2 to p6)

¶48

D. Anjaneya Raju, S/o. D. Satyanaravana Raiu. aoed about 62 vears_ Occ: Pusiness,^{F7o.H.No.47,Venkaia_Sai-Homes,' Nea-rSri ChaitaniaCottege,} Nizampet, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - SOOOSO.

¶49

D. Venkateshwar Raju, S/o. D. Satvanarayana Raiu. aoed about 6O vears. 9cc:..^{Business,R/o.H.No_.12-2-826tN32,' UR Cbbnyi} Opp. LtC^'park, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OOO28.

¶50

S. Manjula,.!V/o. S !! lqrmq, D/o. D. Satyanarayana Raju, aged about 57 '

¶51

years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H No.12-2-B?6!N32, UR Colony, Oip. UCpark, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana - SOO02B.

¶52

Lakshmi Tanuja Datla, D/o. D. Satyanarayana Raiu Dafla. aoed about 23 years, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.12-2-8261N32, UR Colony, O[p. LtC park, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana - 50OO2B.

¶53

Uma Tanmayi Datla, Dio. Ramachandra Raiu Datla. aoed about 23 vears. Occ: Student, R:/o. H.No12-2-8261N32, i-lR Cotoni, Opp. LtC'park, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana - 506028,

¶54

Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No.1 as per Court Orde:r dated 15.12.2023 in l.A. o.i of i02i

¶55

...PETTTIONERS

¶56

AND

¶57

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the princioal. Secretarv to Government, Revenue (ULC), Departmeint, S6cretariat Builijinbs, HyOeii6aa.-

¶58

The Special Officer and.Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, 3d Ftoor, Chandra Mhar, Mozam Jahi Market Road, Hyderabad.

¶59

The District Colleclor, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶60

The Mandal Revenue officer, Rajendran4ar Mandal, Attapur, Hyderabad.

¶61

Kolluri Krishna S/o. Late Kolluri Anjaiah, Age 68 years, Occ: Retd. Employee.

¶62

Kolluri Surya Prakash, S/o. Late K. Narsimha, Age 55 years, Occ: Business.

¶63

Kolluri Rambabu, S/o_ Late K. Mallesh, Age 3g years, Occ: Business.

¶64

Kolluri Kailash, S/o. Late Sivraj, Age 35 years, Occ: Business.

¶65

Bespondent^{Nos.5 to 8 are R/o. Narsing} Village, Raiendernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶66

¶67

Resoondent Nos. 5 to 8 are^{implead€d as per Court Orderdated} 19.12.2023 in l.A.No.l of^{2016(W.P.itl.P-No.38010/2016)}

¶68

...RESPONDENTS

¶69

Petition under Article 226^{of the Constiutionof lndia pralng that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith, the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order or Direc{ion^{more particu{ar{yone in the natweof} writ of Mandamus or any^{other appropriate writ,order or Direction of the like} nature declaring the:-

¶70

(i) the Proceedings No.H1/2770l2006^{dated 16{3-2007 (Section8(4)} orders) issued^by the^{2'd Respondent;}

¶71

(ii) The order issued in^{Procs.No.H1t277Ol2OO6dated16-03-2007} (Statement under Section⁹ of the^{Act) issuedby the 2d Respondent;}

¶72

(iii) Notification dated 21{6-2007^{under Section 10(1) of UrbanLand} (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,^{1976 published in A'P'Gazette187 on dated} 2346-2007;

¶73

(iv) Notification dated 19-07-2007^{under Section 10(3) of UrbanLand} (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,^{1976 published in A'P Gazette No 225 on} dated 24-07^-2007;

¶74

(v) Notice dated 01-09-2007^{inProceedingsNo'H11277012O06 under} Section 1O(5) of Urban^{Land (Ceiling& Regulation)Act,1976 issued by} the 2nd ResPondent;

¶75

(vi)OrderinProceedingsNo.Hlt2TTol2oo6daledo242-2o0SunderSection 10(6) of Urban Land^{(Ceiling & Regulation)Act, 1976 issued by the 2d} Respondent;

¶76

¶77

issued on a dead person namely Hyder AIi Mirza as void ab-initio and non-est and all the consequential actions taken by the Respondent authorities pursuant to the above said impugned orders in so far as the Petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.245.5 Cents or Ac.2-18 guntas in Survey Nos.478 Part, 483 Part, 485 Part, 486 Part & 491 Part of Mancherevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and Principles of Natural Justice consequently set aside all the above impugned orders.

¶78

l.A NO: I OF 2009{wPMP. NO:6547 OF 20091

¶79

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the Respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.2-45.5 cents or Ac.2-18 guntas in Survey Nos.47B part, 483 Part, 485 Part, 486 Part and 491 Part of Mancherevuta Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, not to alienate/allot or sell the same to third parties, not to change the nalure of the above said land belonging to the petitioner pending the disposal of the above writ petition.

¶80

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI E. AJAY REDDY

¶81

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI HARENDER PERSHAD, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶82

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s to 8: SRI GOKULA RAMA RAO

¶83

¶84

WRIT PETITIO N No.5004^{OF 2009}

¶85

Between:

¶86

P.Usha Rani, Wo.P.Rajababu,^{Aged 51 yea-rs,} .Occ-:-Housewife '^No'12-2- 826iN42, L-|.b. colony,^{iuetrdipatn-am, Hyderabad - 5Oo028.}

¶87

Y.Svam Sunder. S/o.Y.Krishna^{Murthy,Aged 47 years, Occ: Service,Rlo'F{at} - Nb.'soi, t;iinhi kriJnna Resideniy, Flot No.15, Venkataramana colony, Khairtabad, Hyderabad^{- 5O0004.}

¶88

Y.Purnachandra Rao,^{S/o. Late Y. KrishnaMurthy,Aged 53 y-egF,Occ:Self} Employee,^R:/o. Flat^{No.101, Lakshmi Krishna Apartments,Kalyan Nagar'} Hyderabad.

¶89

Smt.Y.Duroamalleswari, Wo.Late^{Y. Sai Prasad, Aged 50 yegrs,O-c^c;} Housewifel R/o.12-2-821N42,^{L.l.C. Colony,Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad- 5uu} o2a.

¶90

Y.Kiran Kumar,^{S/o.Late Y. Sai Prasad, Aged} 11^yeary' Qcc. Q{^lmplovee'

¶91

ii" li-ziaNq2, L.i.c. colonv, Mehdipatniam' Hvilerabad - 5o0 028'

¶92

-' Y.Kishore, S/o.Late ri6'.7i-z-bz/Ndi, L.t.c. cotony,^{Y. Sai Prasad'} Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad -^{Aged32- years'. Occ:} 5oo^Self 028'-Employee'

¶93

...PETITIONERS

¶94

AND

¶95

The State of Andhra^{Pradesh,Rep. by, The Principal Secre{ary} .to ' O"re.n."nt, Revenue iuLCJ oepirtmeht, Seiretariat Buildings, Hyderabad'

¶96

The Special Officer and^{Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling' 3d Floor'} - Ctincira Vihar, Mozam Jahi lviarket Road, Hyderabad'

¶97

The District^{Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad'}

¶98

The Mandal Revenue^{Officer, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Attapur' Hyderabad'}

¶99

5- Kolluri Krishna^{S/o. Late Kolluri Aniaiah,Age 68 years, Occ:Retd' Employee'}

¶100

Kolluri Surya^{Prakash, S/o- Late K. Narsimha, Age55 years,Occ:Business'}

¶101

Kolluri Rambabu,^{S/o. Late K. Mallesh,Age 38 years, Occ: Business'}

¶102

Kolluri Kailash,^{S/o. LateSivraj' Age 35 years,Occ: Business'}

¶103

Respondent Nos. 5^{to 8 are Rl/o. Narsing Village, RaiendemagarMandal'} Ranga ReddY District.

¶104

Resoondent Nos. 5 to 8 are^{impleaded as per CourtOrderdated} is.iI.C62l i. i.A.tto.t of^{20l6(w.P.M.P.No.37977/2016l}

¶105

...RESPONDENTS

¶106

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith, the Highcourt may be} pleased to issue a Writ, Order or^{Direction more particularlyone in the nature of}

¶107

¶108

Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction of the like nature declaring the:-

¶109

(i) the Proceedings No.H1/277012006 dated 16-03-2007 (Section 8(4) orders) issued by the 2nd Respondent;

¶110

(ii) the order issued in Procs.No.H 1l277Ot2OOG dated 16-03-2007 I (Statement under Section I of the Act) issued by the 2d Respondent;

¶111

(iii) Notification dated 21-06-2007 under Section 1O(1) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 published in A.p. cazette 182 on dated 23-06-2007

¶112

(iv) Notification dated 19{7-2007 under Section 1O(3) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 pubtished in A.P. Gazette No.225 on date 24-Ol -2OO7;

¶113

(v) Notice dated 01-09-2007 in Proceedings No.H1/Zt7012OO6 under Section 10(5) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regutation) Act, 1976 issued by the 2nd Respondent;

¶114

(vi) Order in Proceedings No.H1l277Ol2OOG dated O2-O2-Z0OB under Section 10(6) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regutation) Act, 1926 issued by the 2d Respondent;

¶115

issued on a dead person namely Hyder Ali Mirza as void ab-initio and non-est and all the consequential actions taken by the Respondent authorities pursuant to the above said impugned orders in so far as the Petitioners land totally admeasuring Ac.0-39 guntas i.e., Ac.0-15 guntas of Petitioner No.l and Ac.O-24 guntas of Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 in Survey Nos. 478l Pan,483t pan,4B4t part and 485/ Part of Mancherevula Village, Raiendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

¶116

¶117

as arbitrary, illegal, contrary^{to the provisionsof urban Land (ceiling& Regulation)} Act, 1976 and violative of^{Article14 of the constitutionof lndia and Principles of} Natural Justice cons€quently^{set aside all the above impugned orders'}

¶118

l.A NO:1 OF

¶119

MP. No:65 52 0F 2009

¶120

Petitionundersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in^{supportof the petition, theHighCourt may be pleased to issue} interim directions to the Respondents^{herein not to dispossess the Petitioners from} the land totally admeasuring^{Ac.O-39guntasi.e., Ac'0-15 guntasbelongingto the} 1't Petitioner and Ac.0-24^{guntas belonging to Petitioner Nos'2 to 6 in Survey} Nos. 478l Part, 483/^{Parl, 484tPart and z185/Part of Mancherevula} Village,RajendranagarMandal,RangaReddyDistrict'nottoalienate/allotorsell theSametothirdparties.nottoChangethenatureofthesaidlandbelongingto the Petitioners^{pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition'}

¶121

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRI E. AJAY REDDY}

¶122

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.l to 4: SRI HARENDER PERSHAD'} SPECIAL GOVERNMENT^PLEADER

¶123

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.Sto 8: SRI GOKULA RAMARAO}

¶124

WRIT PETITION^{No. 5005 OF 200}

¶125

Between:

¶126

1- Smt.S.Maniula. Wo.S.N.Varma,^{aged about 42 years,Occ:.Pvt' Service'} ' Fi;.'ti. I'i;. 1''2-rl ezd Nliz, Llc colon!, Mehdipatnam, Hvderabad'

¶127

1. Sri Venkat^{Ramana Puranam'S/o.Sri PwanamVenkataRqS-a} -' 5ijo.rh"nri.. .o"o aboui:- ng years, Occ: Sqrvlce, R/o-Flat l'lo'508' &;;i;.ai Airart"menti^{Vaiareadvbuda,Srinasarcolonv' Hvderabad'}

¶128

Smt.Pinoali Sheshamma'^{W/o.SriRaiaRedcly,aged} .about:^{66 years' Ooc:} - n6iil"*ir." nyoRoad No.1, Erramanzii Colony, Hyderabad'

¶129

zt Sri P V V.satvanaravan Reddv, S/o.P.Subbi^{Reddy,aged about 63 years'} Occ: Retd. Eniployee,^{Rl/o.Flat No.OO7, Devaki Apartments'M@saramt'agn'} Hyderabad-036

¶130

¶131

Sri- Velagala Lak_shmi Narayana Reddy, S./o. Sri. Ramchandra Reddy, aged about: 31 years, Occ: Software Professional, R/o.Flat No.102. Gopala krishna Towers Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad-25.

¶132

Smt. Medapati Shylaja Reddy, Wo.M.V.Krishna Reddy, aged about: 34 years, Occ: Business R/o_.Flat No.-|02, Gopala Krishna iowe-rs, padamarao Nagar, Secunderabad025

¶133

Smt.Nallamilli Rajyalakshmi, Wo.Sri N.Bhaskar Reddv. aoed about: 38 vearsOcc: Housewife Rt/o.H.No.Z-1-31lB/203, D.K.Road, Leei-a t,tagar Ame'erpeij Hyderabad.

¶134

Smt.Vogireddy Leela.Padmavathi, Wo.Sri. V.Srinivasa Reddy, aged about 35 1eap,^{Oq:; Housewife,Rl/o.H.No.86-18-S4,V.L.puramRafihriundry,East} Godavari District.

¶135

Sri A.Ravi Shankar, S/o.Late Sri V.S.Anathakrishnan, aqed about: 47 vears. Occ: Service, Ryo.S{, B-Block, Brindavan Apartmenis. Chikoti Ga'rdend Begumpet, Hyderabad{16

¶136

10.9.mt.A.Ja_ya S_!.anl<a1, Wo.Sri A.Ravi Shankar, aged about 46 years, Occ: Housewife, _ .R/.o.S6, . q-Bbck, Brindavan Apar{ments, Chitoii Cirdens Begumpet, Hyderabad{1 ti.

¶137

1 1. Smt.K.Sush^eta Prakash, Wo.Kanchada Bala Venkata Krishnan, aged about ?5^{ygqts, Occ:Housewife,R/o.Plot No.12,NandanamColony,-ttizampet} Road, Kukatpally Hyderabad-O7 2

¶138

Smt.P-riyanka Kamineni, Wo.Sri Durga Kiran Kamineni, aged about 35 years, Occ: Service, Ryo.A-1/A, 64 Janakpu-ri, New Delhi-058

¶139

Sri Padava Madhava Krishna, S/o.Sri. Krishna padava, aqed about 66 vears. Occ: Service, R:/o.3-4-255, Kachiguda Behind, Venkitramana Tn'eatie, Hyderabad.

¶140

14.G.V.Naveen, S/o.Sri. G.Buchi Babu, aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o.8-3-67711 6, S.K.D.Nagar, Yellareddyguda, Hyderab'ad.

¶141

Sri. KP^ra_d_eep,- Q/o., S-f K.Babu Rao, aged about 31 years, Occ: Business, Rlo.1 1-3-1711, Balaii Nagar, Khammam.-

¶142

Sri Kalidindi Venkateswara Prasad,- S/o.Sri K_N.Raju, aged about 52 years, Occ: Business R/o.H.No.6-3-569/2, Somajiguda, UyrieraU-ad-gZ,

¶143

Represented by their duly constituted and vatid GpA holder M/s.Alrich Conslructions (P) Ltd having its registered office at Flat No. 19, Jabbar Burldrng, ^tsegumpet,. Hyderabad - 5OO 016, Represented by its Managing Director C. Venkateshwarlu S/o. C.M.Sarma, ageci tO years, pjo. FIat No.F-g] A-Block, Brindavan Apartments, Chikoti Garde-n, Begumpel, Hyderabad vidC legistered^{DevelopmentAgggm_e1$ym€eneral po er bf Attoheydt.2S_1O-} 07 be€ring-document No.508 of 2OOl executed by Writ petitione/ Nos. 1 to 10, 12 to 16.

¶144

...PETITIONERS

¶145

AND

¶146

The State of Andhra^pradesh, Rep. by The princioal. Secretarv to Government, Revenue (ULC) Departmeht, Secretariat Buitciings, UiOeraOLO.^-

¶147

The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, 3d Floor, Chandra Vihar, Mozam Jahi Market Road, HyderabaO.

¶148

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶149

The Mandal Revenue Officer, Raiendranagar^{Mandal, Attapur, Hyderabad.}

¶150

Kolluri Krishna S/o. Late^{Kolluri Anjaiah,Age 68 years, Ooc: Retd. Emdoyee'}

¶151

Kolluri Sr.rrya Prakash, S/o.^{Late K. Narsimha, Age 55 years, Occ: Business.}

¶152

Kolluri Rambabu, S/o. Late^{K. Mallesh,Age 38 years, Occ: Business.}

¶153

Kollwi Kailash, S/o.^{Late Sivraj,Age 35 years, Occ: Business.}

¶154

Respondent Nos.5 to I^{are Rl/o.Narsing Village, RaiendernagarMandal,} Ranga Reddy District.

¶155

Resoondent Nos. 5 to I are^{impleaded as per Court Orderdated} tg.t2.zozs in l.ANo.1 of^{2016 (W.P.M.P.No.38110/m16).}

¶156

...RESPONOENTS

¶157

Petition under Article 226^{of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction^{more particulady onein the nature of} writ of Mandamus or any^{other appropriate writ, order or Direction of the like} nature declaring the:-

¶158

(i) the Proceedings No.H11277012000^{dated16-03-2007(Section8(4)} orders) issued by the^{2nd Respondent;}

¶159

(ii) the order issued in^{Procs.NoH 11277O12006dated 16{3-2007} (Statement under Section I of the Act)^{issued by the 2d Respondent;}

¶160

(iii) Notification dated 21{6-2007^{under Section 10(1) of UrbanLand} (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,^{1976 publishedin A.P' Gazette187 on dated} 2346-2007;

¶161

(iv) Notification dated 19{7-2007^{under Section1O(3)of Urban Land} (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976^{published in A P Gazet(eNo'225 on} dated 2447^-2OOl i

¶162

¶163

(v) Notice dated 01-09-2007 in Proceedings No.H11277012006 under Section 10(5) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 issued by the 2nd Respondent;

¶164

(vi) Order in Proceedings No.H1l277Ol2OOG daled 02-02-2008 under Section 10(6) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 issued by the 2nd Respondent;

¶165

issued on a dead person namely Hyder Ali Mirza as void ab-initio and non-est and all lhe consequential actions taken by the Respondent authorities pursuant to the above said impugned orders in so far as the Petitioners land totally admeasuring Ac.O.22 guntas in Survey No. 478 of Mancherevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and Principles of Natural Justice consequently set aside atl the above impugned orders.

¶166

l.A NO: I OF 2009{W PMP. NO: 6553 OF 20091

¶167

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the Respondents herein not to dispossess the Petitioners from the land admeasuring Ac-O.22 guntas in Survey No.478 of Mancherevuta Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, not to alienate/allot or sell the same to third parties, not to change the nature of the said land belonging to the petitioners pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶168

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI E. AJAY REDDY FOR M/s.E. ANISHA REODy

¶169

¶170

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to4:^{SRI HARENDERPERSHAD'} SPECIAI- GOVERNITIENT^PLEADER

¶171

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.Sto 8: SRI GOKULA RAMA RAO}

¶172

WRIT PETITION No. 5006^{OF 2009}

¶173

Between:

¶174

Tatineni Naravana Rao, S/o.^{Tatineni Ramaiah, Aged 49 years, Occ: Retd'Service'} R/o. Kapelaswarapuram,^{Krishna District.}

¶175

...PETITIONER

¶176

AND

¶177

The State of Andhra^{Pradesh,Rep. by The PrincipalSecretary} .to Government, Revenue^{(ULC)Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad}

¶178

The Soecial Otficer and^{Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, 3d Floor,} Chand'ra Vihar, Mozam^{Jahi MarketRoad'Hyderabad'}

¶179

The District Collector,^{Ranga ReddyDistrict'Lakdikapool, Hyderabad'}

¶180

The Mandal Revenue^{Officer,Rajendra NagarMandal' Attapur, Hyderabad}

¶181

...RESPONDENTS

¶182

PetitionunderAd(icle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the Highcourtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order or^{Direction more particularlyone in the nature of} writ of Mandamus^{or anyother appropriate writ, order or Directionof the like} nature declaring the:-

¶183

(i) the Proceeding s^{No.H1l277Ol20O6dated16-03-2007(Sectbn 8(4)} orders) issued by^{the 2nd respondent;}

¶184

(ii) the order issued in^{Procs.No.H1t277O12O06 datd16{3-2007} (Statement urder Section I of the^{Act) issued by the 2ndRespondent;}

¶185

(iii) Notification dated 21-06-2007^{under Section10(1) of UrbanLand} (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,^{1976published in A.P' Gazette187 on dated} 23-O6-2007;

¶186

¶187

(iv) Notification dated 1 9{7-2007 under Section^'l O(3) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 published in A.P. Gazette No.225 on daled 24-07 -2OO7 i

¶188

(v) Notice dated 01-09-2007 in Proceedings No.H1t2t7Ol2OO6 under Section 10(5) of Urban Land (Ceiting & Regutation) Act, 1976 issued by the 2M Respondent;

¶189

(vi) Order in Proceedings No.H1t277Ot2OO6 dated O242-2008 under Section 10(6) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regutation) Acr, 1976 issued by the 2d Respondent;

¶190

issued on a dead person namely Hyder Ali Mirza as void ab-anitio and non-est and all the consequential actions taken by the Respondent authorities pursuant to the above said impugned orders in so far as the Petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.O39 guntas in Survey Nos. 478 Part, 483 pan, 484 part and 4g5 part of Mancherevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 and violative of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and principles of Natural Justice consequently set aside all the above impugned orders.

¶191

l.A NOi 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO 6554 0F 2009)

¶192

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the Respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.0-39 guntas in Survey Nos. 47gpad,4g3 part, 484 part and 485 Part of Mancherevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dstrict, not to alienate/allot or sell the same to third parties, not to change the

¶193

¶194

nature of the above said^{land belongingto the Petitionerpending the disposal of}

¶195

the above Writ Petition.

¶196

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRI E. AJAY REDDY FORM/s'E' ANISHA REDDY}

¶197

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SRI HARENDERPERSHAD'} SPECIAL GOVERNMENT^PLEADER

¶198

The Court made the following^COMMONORDER:

¶199

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶200

8.4999,5004.5()0 5 and 5OO6 of 2OO9

¶201

COMMON ORDER

¶202

In this batch of writ petitions, the proceedings. issued by thc respondent No.2 under Sections B(r), S(4), 10(1). 1O(3), 10(5) and 10(6) of the Urban Land Ceiting (Regulation) Act, 1976 in respect of File No.H1z'2710/200€ dated 16.03.2007, have been challenged ccntending that the proceedings were issued in the name of a dead person, namely, Hyder Ali Mirza.

¶203

Heard Mr. E. Ajay Reddy, learned senior counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. Harender^pershad, learned Spccial Governmcnt Pleader.

¶204

Lea!-ned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue, rnvolved in this barch of writ petitions, is squarely covered by the common order dated 21.04.2015 in Wp.Nos.16715 and 17160 of 2009 wherein it was held as under:

¶205

"9. lt is not clear from thc aver.rncnts mad€ in thc counter affidavit as to wlren for the first ti:ne the respondent authoritics have recog nizeci that the land is ilo more used for agriculturai purpose and converted to non-agricuitural purpose. There is flo clarity on this issue- By the time the proccedings under the Act 1976 were comrnenced, tlyder Ali Mirza cxpired. The report of enquiry officer, datcd 02.09.2006, discloses that namcs of thc petitioocrs wcrc retlccted in the revenuc records from the year 2OO2-03 oowards as patl.adar- Thus, by the tinrc proceedings undcr Scctiofl U(3) cf the

¶206

¶207

Act 1976 commenced, tir: respondent authority was aware that the petitioners in possession and enjoyment and are treated as pattadars. Therefore, they were cnti ed to notica Jnd opportunity before issuinE final statement section 10 or the Act ,rr..;1[."jT":"J;il::""ifi:::.r: set asrde on the sole grcund that the petitioners were not put on notice and no opportunity of hearing was given to them before the finalization of proceedings under the Act f976.

¶208

On account of the saie made by the original owner tn the year 1982 and consequential sale by the society to other persons from whom petitioners purchased, it was required to be seen whether still provisions of the Act L9 opportunity was s iven .",^" r::,J:::, i[iT" Jl,i" J ;lll] the applicability or otherwise of the Act 1976 on the grounO of tne status of the land as agricultural land as well as the hotding capacity

¶209

vis-i-vis, the provisions of the Act 1976. Thus, it cannot be said that not giving notice is empty forinality, more particula.ly, when tt affects the right to own the property whrch rs a substantive ri'ht and such a right cannot bc process or rar,/. rhe oo ,r;ut;"1::.:r.r':t.:':;;::::: affording of opportunity as mandjtory before passing orders-

¶210

To take compulsory posses t'on under sect'cn 10(6) of the Act 1976, the persons who u.. ,n must be put on notice. Admittedry, by the time ,"o,onoott"tt'on 10(6) of the Act 1976 proceedrngs commencecr, the petitioncrs v treated as pattadars ". ,"rt"li"''."[::"jt'::#l TI il: petitioners were not put cn notice. The proceedings under various provisions of the Act 1976 were taken out treating Hyder Ali Mi.za as owner, whereas by 19g2 itself he sold several extents of land originally owned by him and ceased to be owner to the extent of land sold by him. Thus, by the tirne the Repeating Act came into force, the property has not vest and, thererore, a, the proceedines under the ^.,^{,r;t::?:."ttate}

¶211

Learned Special Government

¶212

Pleader fairly contended that 17160 of 2009 is Hyder Ali

¶213

the declarant in Wp.Nos.1671S and

¶214

¶215

Mirza and the impugned proceedings therein were set side by recording a finding that Hyder Ali Miza expired by the time proceedings under the 1976 Act commenced. The appeals filed by the State Government in WA.Nos.7O. 76, Slg and S39 of 2019 have been dismissed as withdrawn on 0g.O3.2022. Copy of the said order is placed on record. Later, the review application in Review IA.No.1 of 2022 in WP.Nos.t6715 and 17160 of 2009, filed by the State challenging the order dated 2L.O4.2015, uras dismissed vide order dated 02.12.20O2.

¶216

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to the report of the Enquiry Officer dated 02.09.2006.

¶217

I have perused the said report dated 02.09.2006. The names of the writ petitioners have been recorded as occupiei.s in the said report along with the names of petitioners in Wp.Nos.16715 and 17160 of 2009. As per the said reoort, Hyder Ali Mirza sold the land admeasuring Ac.3.18 guntas in Sy.tio.49lle9 and Ac.1.OO guntas in Sy.No.49l/er (Ac.4.18 guntas in Manchirevula village) to Swastik Cooperative House Building Society Limited under registered sale deed dated bearing document No.8276/1992. According to the enquiry officer, the declarant Hyder Ali Mirza violated conditions of Section 2(O) certificate by selling the same to individual persons.

¶218

¶219

It was also mentioned that flyder Ati Mirza obtained Section 2(O) certificate No.C5l107l 1982 dated 06.08.1982 for total extent -of Ac.50.03 guntas of Manchirevula Village comprising of several survey numbers including Sy.No./i91le9, e9.

¶220

As noted above, the report dated 02.09.2006 was also considered by learned Single Judge of this Court in Wp.Nos.167ls and 17160 of 2009 dated 21.04.2015 wherein ir was held by this Court that the names of the petitioners therein were reflected in the revenue records and they were in possession and enjoyment land in question and were treated as pattadars and that they were entitled to notice and opportunity before final statement and before taking proceedings under Section 10 oF the Act. Further, rt was recorcied, as extracted above in para 3, that these proceedings are liable to be set aside on this sole ground and as no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners before finalization of the proceedings under the Act.

¶221

Thus. it is submittect by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the petitiolers har-,^ "-^:: .:,''or ners herein are similarly plaaed as that of the petitioners in Wp. No s.16715 and 17160 of 2009. The said statement is not disputed by the learned Special Government Pleader. However, the learned Special Government pleader submitted that the relief, if any, granted to the petitioners may be

¶222

"'''

¶223

)

¶224

confined to their respective extents and there may not be general observations.

¶225

In view of the above, the u/rit petitions are allowed. The impugned proceedings, issued in respect of the lands of the petitioners viz. Ac.1.48.5 cents in Sy.t'Jo.478(P), 483(P), 485(P), 486(P) and 491(P) in WP.No.4998 of 20O9; Ac.2.18 guntas in Sy.No.a78(P), 483(P), 485(P), 486(P) and 491(P) in WP.No.4999 of 2009; Ac.0.39 guntas (Ac.0.15 guntas of petitioner No.1 and Ac.0.24 guntas of petitioners No.2 to 6 in Sy.No.478(P), 483(P), 48a(P) and a85(P) in WP.No.5004 of 2009; Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.478 in WP.No.5005 of 2009 and Ac.0.39 guntas in Sy.No.478(P), 483(P), 484(P) and 43s(P) in wP.No.5006 of 20o9, Manchirevula Village, Rajendranagar' tlandal, Ranga Reddy District, are set aside insofar as the petitioners are concerned.

¶226

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand

¶227

closed. There shall be no order as to costs. t

¶228

That Rule Nisi has been^{absoluteas above' Witness the HON'BLE THE CHIEF} jiisiicE sct n-ox ARADHE, on this Tuesday, the Nineteenth^{Day of} December, Two^{Thousand and Twenty Three'}

¶229

SD/-T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Princioal Secretary to^{Government, Revenue (ULC)Department' State of} ralngini, Secretariaf^{Buildings'Hyderabad'}

¶230