Allowed

Union of India rep by its Secretary to the Govt., v. G.v.Rama Mohan

Telangana HC6 Jul 2023WP/46800/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A batch of writ petitions challenged CAT orders directing that financial upgradation under MACPS be granted to the grade pay of the next promotional post. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. M.V. Mohanan Nair, the High Court allowed the petitions, holding that MACPS only entitles an employee to the next grade pay, not the grade pay of the next promotional post.

What did the court decide?

All writ petitions allowed; impugned orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal in various O.As. set aside.

Union of India rep by its Secretary to the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³¹⁸ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:23ff)5 34461 36422 42124 46378 46762 & 46800 0F 2016 163. 191, 507, 664, 787 .788,801, 1375, 5150, 5791, 18s16. & 185240F^20'.t7

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 23095 OF 2016

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Union Of lndia, rep. by its Director General, Central Govt.^Health Scheme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan. New Delhi^- 1 10 108

¶10

The Additional Director, Central Govt, Health Scheme^(CGHS), KendriyaSwasthyaBhavan, Prakashnagar Begumpet. Hyderabad 16

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 SRI K.NATARAJ, Aged about 49^years- Occ service O/o^{Additional Director.} Central Govt. Health Scherpe K.S. Bhavan. Begumpet.^Hyderabad-16

¶14

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad^{Bench. Hyderabad} rep. by, its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad,^Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution^{of lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{fited therewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calting for the records relating to order daled^{1411012015in O.A-} No.706 of 2014 passed by lhe Hon'ble Central^{AdministraliveTribunal.} Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the^{same as contrary to law,} illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to^{provisionsof tvlACP scheme}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPM P. NO: 28431 OF 2016)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleasedto} suspend the operation of the order dated^14l1Ol2O1 5^{in 0.A- No.706of 201 4}

¶19

passed by the Hon'ble Central Adminrstrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad pending disposal of the Writ Petition

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpUTy SOL|C|TOR

¶21

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO: 34461 OF 2016

¶24

Between:

¶25

1 The Union.of lndia rep. by its Director General Central Govt_ H€alth Scheme, Ministry of Health and Family Wetfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi-1 1010g

¶26

2 The Additional Director, Central Govt., Health Scheme (CGl-S), Kendriya Swasthya Bhavan, Prakashnagar tsegumpet, Hyderabad l6

¶27

.,PETITIONERS

¶28

AND

¶29

,| K.SRI LAKHSMI, Aged about 48 years, Occ: service O/o Additional Director Central Govt. Health Scheme K.S. Bhavan, Begumpet, Hyderabad-16

¶30

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, l-.lyderabad Rep. by its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶31

...RESPONDENTS

¶32

Petition under Adicle 226 ot the Constitutton of lndia prayin[r that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Ccurt may be pleased to lssue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Wiit of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to order dated 14/10/20.15 in O.A. No.702 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Admlnistralive Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, uniust and contrary to provisions of Ir,lACp scheme

¶33

l.A NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 42483 OF 2016)

¶34

Petition under Section'151 CpC praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of orders dated 14t1ot2o.t 5 in O.A No.702 of :2014 by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt. GAD| PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpUTy SOLICITOR

¶36

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶37

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶38

WRIT PETITION NOi 36422 OF 2016

¶39

Between:

¶40

Union of lndia rep. by its Secretary to the Govl. of lndia, N4inistry of N/ines, Department of^{Mines, Shastri Bhavan New Delhi} -^{110 001.}

¶41

The Director General, Geological survey of lndia (CHQ), 27, J.L.Nehru Road, Kolkala - 700 016.

¶42

The Dy.Director General (P), Geological Survey of lndia, (CHQ), 27, J.L.Nehru road, Kolkata 700 016.

¶43

The Dy.Director General, Training lnstitute, Geological Survey of lndia, Southern Regional Office, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶44

,..PETITIONERS

¶45

AND

¶46

S.Nageswara Rao, S/o Late S.V-N Sharma, Aged about 53 years, Occ U.D.C, working in Training lnstitute Geological Survey of india, Southern Regional Office Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶47

2 O.Srinivas Gautham, S/o late O.Rama Rao Aged 46 years, Occ Assistant, working in Training lnstitute Geological Survey oI india, Southern Regional Office Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶48

a G.Subhas Chandra Bose, S/o Late G.Raju Aged 46 years, Occ^personnel Assistant working in Training lnstitute Geological Survey of india, Southern Regional Office Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶49

4 K.Mahaboob Valli, S/o Rasool Saheb Aged 46 years, Occ LDC. working in Training lnstitute Geological Survey of india, Southern Regional Of{ice Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶50

5 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench. Hyderabad rep. by, its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶51

...RESPONDENTS

¶52

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith. the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to orders dated 1611012015 in O.A.No- 63A ot 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to provisions of \4ACP scheme

¶53

l.A NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:44872 OE 2016)

¶54

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of orders daled 1611012015 in OA- No.63B of 2014^passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal; Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶55

lA NO:^'t OF 2022

¶56

Petilion under Section 15'l CpC prayinq that in the circumstanccs stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of Wp No. 36422 of 2016 by fixing an early (Jate of hearing in the interest of justice

¶57

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. GAD| PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SOTLICITOR

¶58

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶59

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶60

WRIT PETITION NO: 42124 oF 2016

¶61

Between:

¶62

1 Union of lndia rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of personnel, public Grievances and Pensions Dept. of Personnel and Trg. Nbrth Block, New Derlhi.

¶63

2 The.tv nislry^of Home_Affairs, rep. by its Secretary to The Govr:rnment, North Block No.g, 8lh tloor CGO Complex, Lodhi Road. New Delhi 11,1 003

¶64

The Chief Forensic Scientrst DFSS, Ministry of Home Affairs COO Comptex, Lodhi Road, New Dethi.

¶65

The Drrector, Central Forensic Science Lab, DFSS, Minist!.y ol Home Affairs Ramanthapur, Hyderabad - 13

¶66

,..I'ETITION ERS

¶67

A TIN

¶68

1 M SRJNIVASA.RAO, ^S/o.^{Satyanarayana Aged about 44 years,r)ccpresen y} Assrslant, CFSL Rio Qr. No.lV/1, CFSL, Cahpus Ramanihapur, Hyderabacl '

¶69

2 K _Venkaleswarlu, S/o Gopaiah Aged about 44 yearc, Occ Stenc,grapher Gr lll, CfSL R/o^ 2.1OBlSt4tt1, SidOivinayJrJ Nlgir' B.JOrppatl ilyderaoad (Presently Deceased)

¶70

3 * Pnllrg.*Yolesavulu^{Aged.about46 years, Occ presently Al;sistant, CFSL} R/o 23-6-802, Belachandulal, Shahalibanda Hyderabad

¶71

4 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Triby-nal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad, rep by its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Ayderabad.

¶72

...RESPONDENTS

¶73

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia prayirg that in the cii'cui'nstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High cJurt may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarry in the nature of writ of Cerliorari, by calling for the records relating to order dated 1BlO9t2O14 in OA No-1107 of 2O14 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunat, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside lhe same as conlrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, unjust and pass such' other order or orders as this tJon'tle court deems fit and proper, in the interest of .justice.

¶74

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 51933 OF 2016)

¶75

Petilion uMer Section 'r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the order dated 1g/09/2014 in o.A.No. 11d7 0f 2014 passed by the Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyd€rabad pending disposat of the Writ petition

¶76

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt GAD| PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpUry SOL|C|TOR

¶77

GENERf,L OF tNDtA

¶78

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶79

WRIT PETITION NO: 46374 OF 2016

¶80

Between:

¶81

Pliolt. o[ lndia rep by ils- Secretary to the Govt., Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Alfairs Currency and Coinage Division, North Block, New Delhi

¶82

The General Manager, lG tvtint. Unit of ApMCtL tDA, phase ll, Cherlapally, Hyderabad -51

¶83

..PETITIONERS

¶84

AND

¶85

1 A Tirumala Ajai, S/o A.T_Seshadri Aged 54 years, Occ Enqineer lndia Govt Mint, Unit of APtulClL tDA Phase , Cnertap5 y, Hyderabad -51

¶86

The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad represented by its Registrar

¶87

.-.RESPONDENTS

¶88

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High Cdurt may be pleased to lssue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records relating to order dated 10i3l2016 in oA No.1 1 29 of 2o14 passed by the Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, unjust

¶89

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016{WPMP . NO: 57123 OF 2016)

¶90

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flled in support of the. petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of orders dated 10/3/2016 in OA No.1129 oi 201+-passed by the Hon'ble central Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶91

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpUT'/ SOLICTTOR

¶92

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶93

Counsei for the Respondents: None appeared

¶94

WRIT PETITION NO: 4 6'762 AF 2016

¶95

Between:

¶96

,i ,^,

¶97

, Hlpl. gl india_rep by its-. Seqetary to the Govt., Ministry, o[ finance, uepartment -or Economic Affairs currency and coinage Division, North Brock, New Delhi

¶98

The General lrrlanager, 1G Mint,,Unit of ,ApMClL, IDA phase ll, Cherlapa y, Hydcrabad -5 i

¶99

,..PETIT!ONFRS

¶100

AND

¶101

1 M.Sa_tyavakeeswaran S/o Late K.S.Mani,, Dy. Accountant, Unit of AptvlClL IDA Phase ll, Chertapally, Hyderabad -5i'^'

¶102

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad represenled by rls Regislrar

¶103

...RE:SPONDENTS

¶104

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitutircn of rncria prayirg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High C)Jurt may be pleasec to issue 3n order or direction more parricurarry in thJ nature oi writ of cerliorari. by calling for rhe records rerating to order dated 1gt3tzo1t) in oA No 93 of 20'15 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyd,_.rabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, aibiirary, unlusr

¶105

l-A- NO: 1 OF 201 6(WPMP. NO: 57587 OF 2016)

¶106

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstarces stated in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High court may t,e preased to suspend lhe operation of the order dated 1Bl3/2016 in oA- No. 95 of 2tit 5 passed by the Hon'ble centrar Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabacr pending disposat of the Writ petition.

¶107

counsel for the Petitioners: SRr. cADl PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpury solrcrroR

¶108

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶109

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶110

WRIT PETITION NO:46800 oF 2016

¶111

Between:

¶112

Union of lndia reD b

¶113

Rsr#i,lil,1?J;f,,.:)l"li,,n'"%:1il.1",,1!%s,9$;alfr^i..x,{,,fi l,IrHSsi:

¶114

' Il:"P#T:LManager,^{lc Mint, unit of ApMCrL, rDAphaserr, cherrapary,}

AND

...PETITIONERS

,?.Y;%1ffi Y,?,i,lt,.,,:&Ffl siJ?&i?H3g,f %".."ilJ,iiil,?eilgr,"l

¶119

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad represented by its Registrar

¶120

...RESPONDENTS

¶121

Petition under Article 226-_of the Constitution of tndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit r,La tr,.r"i,it.,] the HigLh court may be pleased to issue an order or direcrion ;;;. ;;;;;i;;ty rn rhe narure of Wr* or Certiorari, by callinq for the. records relating to order' daled 1Ot3t2O16 in OA No.1 126 ot 2014 passed by tfre Hon,OtJ ;;;;' Adminislrative Tribunat, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad "nO^{."t,"iOJ-in.-.rrn"as contrarylo law,} rllegal, arbitrary, uniust and. Dass such other orO.,. o,, orO-"r, as this Hon,ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of the justice.

¶122

!.A. NO:1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 57633 OF 2016)

¶123

Petition under seclion 1 51 cpc praying that in the qrcumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the peiitio;, ifrl frigh'' borrt may be pteased to suspend the operation of the ordei a"t"o totsiz.dr.^'in oA No. 1 126 0f 2014 passed by the Hon,ble Central Administrative -iiiLunal. Hyderabad pending disposal of the Writ petition^{- '""} Hyderabad Bench,

¶124

Counsel for the petitioners: SRt. cADl PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SOLICITOR

¶125

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶126

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶127

WRIT PETITION NO: 163 OF 2017

¶128

Between:

¶129

' New H!iQ{!"','3l'E":n,-1il Dethi. if",l?,",f,#"i",,1!"..,o,.9J,i; JLrl.,:?, ,ti,.,r,i6lii:

¶130

' I?:.r"""#?:ll\rlanaser,^{lG Mint'unit of APMCTLtDA phaseil, chertapaily.}

¶131

P ETITIONERS

¶132

AND

¶133

1 D- Laxman Das, S/o^{Late D-Raialingam Aged64 years, Occ Engneer ( Retd)} r"oi, c6"i. v.i, u.l-t^{APN,'lciL lDa Phaaell, cirerlapallv, Hvd€rabad'51}

¶134

The Hon'ble Central^{AdministrativeTribuhal, Hyderabad Bench,I-{yderabad} represented by^its Registrar . tr

¶135

.-.RE:SPONDENTS

¶136

petition under A.ittcte 226 of the bonstitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavitfiledtherewith, the Highcourt may be,} fleased^{to issue an orderor directionmore.particularlyin the nature of writ of} bertiorari, by calling^{for the records relating to orderdated 10/3/2016in OA} No.1 132 ol 2O14^{passed by the Honlble CentralAdministrativeTribunal'} Hyderabad Bench^{at Hyderabad and set aside the same as ccrltrary to law'} illegal, arbitrary, unjusl

¶137

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017^{(WPMP.NO: 177 OF 2O171}

¶138

PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Court may t'e pleasedto} suspend the won of^{orders dated 10/3/2016 in OA No 1132of 2014 passed by the} Hon'ble Central Administrative^{Tribunal,,Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad' pending} WP

¶139

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRI GADIPRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUTY SOLICITOR}

¶140

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶141

Counsel for the Respondents:^{None appeared}

¶142

WRIT^PETITION NO:^{191 OF 2017}

¶143

Between:

¶144

Union of lndia^{rep. by its Secretaryto the Govt ilinistryof Finance'} o"pittr"ni of f.oho.i6^{Affairs Cunency and coinage Division' North Block'} New Delhi-

¶145

The General Manager.^{lG Mint, (A Unit of SPMCIL)' IDA Phasell'} Cherlapally,^Hyderabad-51

¶146

,..I)ETITION^ERS

¶147

AND

¶148

C. Bhavani Prasad^{S/o Late Chandrasekhara Sastry, Aged 55 years' Occ:} Engin.u, lndia Govt.^{Mint, Unit of SPMCIL IDA Phasell Cherlallally'} Hyderabad-51

¶149

The Hon'ble Central^{AdministrativeTribunal, HyderabadBenchHyderabad} rep' by' ils Registrar

¶150

6 r:c./\r, nE rr-rc

¶151

Petition under Arricre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying lhal in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, rhe High^'cJua may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records rerating to order dated .r 0/3/2016 in oA No 1128 oF 2014 passed by the.Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunai, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and pet aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, uniust

¶152

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO:211 oF 20171

¶153

Petition under Section i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of orders dated 101312016 in oA No.1128 0f 2014 passed by the Hon'ble central Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶154

counser for the^petitioners: sRt. GADI pdaverru KUMAR DEpury soltctroR

¶155

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶156

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶157

WRIT PETITION NO: 507 0F 2017

¶158

Between:

¶159

1 li'ion. ot lndia_ rep by its- Secretary to the Govt., Ministry ot Finance, uepartment ot Economic Affairs Currency and Coinage Division, North Block, New Delhi

¶160

The General lvlanager, lG Mint, Unit of ApMCIL IDA phase ll, Chertapa y, Hyderabad -51

¶161

...PETITION ERS

¶162

AND

¶163

1 D Sambasiva Rao, S/o Lale D.Ramakrishna Rao Aged 53 years, Occ Officer (Tech) lndia Govt, Mint, Un[ of ApMCtL tDA phase it, Cneriapi[i,,-Hyo.iaUr'o -51

¶164

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad represented by its Resistrar

¶165

..RESPONDENTS

¶166

Petition under Arricre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cdud may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarry in the nature of wiit of certiorari. by cal{ing for the records relating to ordei dated 101312016 in oA No 1 127 of 2014 passed by the Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law,

¶167

illegal, arbitrary, unjust and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of the justice.

¶168

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 564 OF 2017)

¶169

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may l)e^pleased to suspend the operation of orders dated 103/2016 in OA No.1127 ol 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench;rt Hyderabad, pending W P and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and^proper.

¶170

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUT'\r SOLICITOR

¶171

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶172

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶173

WRIT PETITION NO: 664 OF 2017

¶174

Between:

¶175

Union of lndia rep by its Secrelary to lhe Govt-, Ministr'/ of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs Currency and Coinage Division, No(h Block, New Delhi,

¶176

The General Manager, lG Mint,.Unit of APMCIL, IDA Phase il, Cherlapa y, Hyderabad -51

¶177

...PETITIONERS

¶178

AND

¶179

1 M.Prakash Rao, S/o Late M.Balaiah Aged 59 years, Occ Dy.Acoountant, lndia Govt. Iv|int Unit of APfulClL IDA Phase ll, Cherlapally, Hyderabad -51

¶180

.) The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench, Hyderabad represented by its Registrar

¶181

..RE,SPONDENTS

¶182

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayirlg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High C;ourt may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to order dated 181312016 in OA No.92 of 2015 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyd,-.rabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, unjust

¶183

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 739 OF 20171

¶184

Petition under Section^.151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in lhp af f idavil f ilerl in o rnnnrl ^f tha ^otiti^n th6 l-li^h a^' 'rl m., l16 ^la.ca.l t^

¶185

suspend the operation of the order daled 1g13/2016 in oA No.g2 0f 2015 passed by the Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunar, uvo"I"o"o Bench, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Wril petition

¶186

COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONErS: SRI. GADI dRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUTY SOLICITOR

¶187

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶188

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶189

WRIT PETITION NO: 787 0F 2017

¶190

Between: i'l ,, I

¶191

Union of lndia. reo by it.s .Sec_retary to the Govt., I\4inistry ol Finance. New Deparrmenr Delhi of Fcoriomit anaiiJcurrtiicy-a#t;;s6 ; DiliJd, N;rih,fi#i:

¶192

' I?:",c#?:LManaser,^{lG Mint,unir or;npuctl tDAphaser, cherrapaily,}

¶193

..PETITIONERS

¶194

AND

¶195

¶196

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative il??i8fr .'il"]3[iif 'l;i8#8iD,i'Ff, Tribunal, ]""SIf Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabadffi.f ffj?l,fil?;p,:..!?. represented by its Registrar I^I I

¶197

...RESPONDENTS

¶198

Petition under Arttcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fifeO ttreiewitfr, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction ,or" prrti"ririly in me nature of Writ of C.ello?ri, by ca ing For the records relating to order aat6o lantzola in OA No.91 of 2015 passed by the Hon'ble Central Adirinistrrtir" ilirnul, Hyderabad Bench al Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to Lw, i egaL, .ibit "ry,;",;i

¶199

l.A. NO:1 oF 2017 (WPMP. NO: 872 oF 20171

¶200

Petition under Section^.151 CpC praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the affidavir fited in support or qre pgiilo;r ini i;!r,- cor.t may be pteased ro suspend the operation of orders dared 1gt3r2o16 in^-oA tto,gt ,r zorc -r,r.J oi the Hon'ble centrar Administrative Tribunat, nyJeraoao Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶201

Counsel for the petitioners: SRI GADi PRAVEEN DEPUTY SOL|C|TOR

¶202

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶203

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶204

WRIT PETITION NO: 788 OF 2017

¶205

Between:

¶206

Union of lndia rep hy its Secretary to the Govt., Ministry of Finance, Departrnent of Economic Affairs Currency and Coinage Divisiorl, North'Block, New Delhi.

¶207

The General Manager, lG lvlint, Unit of APlr,lCtL, IDA Phase ll, Cherlapally, Hyderabad -51

¶208

...i,ETITIONERS

¶209

AND

¶210

1 V. Sudarsana Rao Sio Late V.Ramakrishna Rao, Occ S.G.Engi-reer lndia Govt. Mint, Unit of APMCIL IDA Phase ll, Cherlapally, Hydera6ad -51

¶211

2 The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench, Hyderabad represented by its Registrar

¶212

...RESPONDENTS

¶213

Petition under Article 226 of the Constilution of lndia prayilg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Oourt may be pleased 10 issue an order or direction more particularly rn the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to order dated 10/:l/2016 in OA No.1130 ol 2O14 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administ.ative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law. illegal, arbitrary, unjust

¶214

I.A NO: 1 OF 2017 WPMP. NO: 873 OF 2017)

¶215

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumsta rces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitron, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 10/3/2016 in OA. No. 1130 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad pending disposal of lhe writ petition.

¶216

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUTY SOLICITOR

¶217

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶218

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶219

WRIT PETITI ON NO 601 0F 2017

¶220

Between:

¶221

_Union of lndia, reo b 6;##"13,l?":.f.,,ilol?",1,"3,"I1#",1"* j5"",q,"Jkffir..,#,fi l.Li?issi,

¶222

' I?8.?":#.J:LManaser,^{1G Mint, Unit or ApMCILrDAphase} r, cherrapary,

¶223

AND

¶224

..PETITIONERS

¶225

P.Kameswara Rao, S/o Lale ;;g:?:ffi^{a#iil:"iil"",?t'^H^ruf pflBf JS",ii..r""He,ecrionGrade}

¶226

2 I#*[.J5 &.li:,,J 4Hl:1.^{n"# rribuna r, Hyde ra badB} en ch, H ydera ba d

¶227

...RESPONDENTS

¶228

Petition under ArIicIe 226 of the Constitution o f lndia praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleaseC to issue an order or direction more particular ly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calling lor the records relating to orde r dated 10t3t2}16 in OA No.1125 of 2014 passed by the Hon,ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at H yderabad and set aside the same as contrary to law. illegal, arbilrary, uniust

¶229

I.A. NO:1OF 2017(WP MP. NO : 886 OF 2017t

¶230

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the ctrcumstances sfated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders daled 101312016 in OA No.1125 of 2014 passed by the Hon'bre centrar Administrative Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W_p

¶231

Counsel for the petitioners: SRt GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SOLIC|TOR

¶232

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶233

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶234

WRIT PETITION NO: 1375 OF 2017

¶235

Between:

¶236

1- Union of lndia, represented by The Secretary, Government of lndia, Minisky of Communications and lT, Deparlment of Posts - lndia, DakBhavan, SansadMarg, New Delhi 1 10 001

¶237

2- The Chief Postmaster General, A.P. Circle,^"DakSandan" Abids, Hyderabad 500001

¶238

The Director of Postal Services, Hyderabad Region, 0/o tfre Postmaster General, Hyderabad Region, Hyderabad 500 001

¶239

...I]ETITIONERS

¶240

AND

¶241

1 G. Ramakrishna, S/o Late G. Ramachandra Murthy, Aged aboul 63^years, Retd. Section Supervisor. 0/0 PMG, Hyderabad Region, R/o H.llo. 2521A', Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 5OO 072

¶242

., Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan, Hyderabad Rep by its Registrar

¶243

...Rt:SPONDENTS

¶244

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayirg that in the circumstanoes stated in the affidavii frled iherewith, lhe High Oourt may be pleased to issue an order or direction more parlicularly rn the nature of Wrlt of Ce!'tiorari, calling for lhe records periaining to order daled 0'!.06.2016 in OA No. 852 of 2015 of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hycr'erabad ancj quash the same as iliegai, arbiirary, contrary to iaw and unconstitutional

¶245

LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 1556 O F 20171

¶246

Petition under Seclion 15-1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may l)e pleased to suspend lhe operation of orders dated 01,06 2016 in OA No. 852/2015 passed by lhe Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench Ert Hyderabad, pending W.P

¶247

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUnf SOLICITOR

¶248

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶249

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶250

WRIT PETITION NO: 5150 OF 2017

¶251

Between:

¶252

1, Union of lndia, rep. by its Secretary to the Govt. of lndia Ministry of Mines, Deparlment of Mines, Shastri Bhavan New Delhi - 110 001.

¶253

The Drector General, Geological survey of lMia (CHO), 27, J.L.Nehru Road, Kolkata - 7O0 016.

¶254

The Dy.Director General (P), Geololical survey of lndia (CHO), 27, J.L,Nehru Road, Kolkata - 700 016.

¶255

The Dy.Director General, Training lnstitute, Geological Survey of lndia, Southern Regional Office, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad

¶256

..-PETITIONERS

¶257

AND

¶258

Smt. T.Radha Devi, Wo Shri K.Govinda RaJUlu, Aged about 37 years, Occ L.D.C. Geological Survey of lndia Training lnstitute, Southern Regional, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶259

2 Shri Ravi Ranjan Kumar, S/o Janardhan Prasad Verma, Aged about 41 years, Occ UDC Working in the 0/o Director, FTC-Raipur. Geological Survey of lndia Training lnstitute, Southern Region, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

¶260

J The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad rep. by its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶261

..RESPONDENTS

¶262

Petition under Arlicle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courl may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to orders dated 16t1O12O15 in O.A.No- 639 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and set aside the same as contrary lo law, illegal, arbitrary, unlust and contrary to provisions of MACP scheme

¶263

l.A NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 6259 OF 2017)

¶264

Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders dated 1611O12O15 in OA. No.639 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W-P

¶265

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. cADl PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SOLICITOR

¶266

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶267

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶268

WRIT PETITION NO: 5791 0F 20',17

¶269

Between:

¶270

Union of^ lndia, . .rep.r b_y. the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.

¶271

The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal. Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad.

¶272

The Secretary, Dept. Of Personnel and Training, M/o personnel, public Grievances and Pensions, New Delhi_

¶273

...PETITIONERS

¶274

AND

¶275

1 K. Janaki, W/O Shri K.Keshava Rao, aged about 58 yrs, Occ Assistant, Cenkal Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench. Fiyderabad.

¶276

2 P.Venkateswaramma. W/O Shri A. Jaganmohan Reddy, aged about 53 yrs, Occ Assistant, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hydera6ad'Bench,^' Hyderabad.

¶277

3 Y.L.K.Rekha, WO Shri V.K.Raju, aged about 53 yrs, Occ Upper Division Clerk, Central Administrative Tnbunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyberabad.

¶278

4 T.Gane_shBabu, S/O Late T.V.S. Rao, aged about 56 yrs, Occ Upper Division Clerk, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hrderabad Bench, Hyderbbad.

¶279

5 G-Hiranmayi, WO Shri A V.Gangadhg[ Rao, aged about 53 yrs, Occ Upper Division Clerk, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bi:nih, Hyderabad.

¶280

6 4^{Anjaneyulu, S/o Late A.Viswanatham,aged about 50 yrs,Occ Upper} 9ivision^{Clerk (on deputation as Caretaker). Central Adr;riniskativetribunal,} Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad.

¶281

7 T.Aravinder Re{dy,. S/O Shri T.Ramaknshna Reddy, aged about 51 yrs, Occ Upper Division Clerk, Central Administrative Tribun'al, tiyderabad Behch, Hyderabad.

¶282

I S RajaRajeswari, w]o Srinivas Murthy, aged about 44 yrs, Occ Upper Division Clerk, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Ben'ch, Hyderi5ad.

¶283

..RESPONDENTS

¶284

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to common order dated AfinO16 in OA No. 642 of 2014 of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and quash the same as illegal, arbikary, contrary to law and unconstitutional

¶285

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017|WPMP. NO: 7066 0F 2017)

¶286

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circlmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated Al ZOl6 in OA No 642120.14 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Erench. Hyderabad. pending disposal ot the Writ Petition I r

¶287

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. cADl PRAVEEN KUMAR Dy. SOL|C|TOR

¶288

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶289

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI ainaCUU'kUfrann

¶290

r:,,

¶291

WRIT PETITION NO: 18516 OF 2017

¶292

l Between:

¶293

Union of lndia,. .rep., by Secretaiy, Dept. Of perscnnel and Training, North Block. New Delhi.

¶294

The Central Administrative Trib'un?|, rep., by its Registr€r, principal Bench, New Delhi.

¶295

3 The Central Administrative Tribunal, rep., by its Registrar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad.

¶296

..,PETITION ERS

¶297

AND

¶298

P Sivaiah, S/O1a!e P.Balraju, aged about 53 yrs, Gestetner Operator, Centra! Adminiskalive Tribunal, Hyderabad, r/o 65-A, GpRA Campus, GachiBowtr, HYderabad

¶299

..RES''NDENTS

¶300

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndra t)raying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith. the Hiith Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in th€.nature o[ Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records p.ertaining to common order dated BntZOl6 in OA No. 583 of 2o14of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and u n con s titu tiona I r

¶301

l.A. NO: 1OF 20171WPMP. NO:22 594 0F 2017)

¶302

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit iiled in suppcrt cf the petition, the Hrgh Court rray bc pleased to suspend the operation of common order dated Bll 12016 in OI, No. 593 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending W.P.

¶303

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DY. SOLICITOR

¶304

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶305

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI A RAGHU KUMAR

¶306

WRIT PETITION NO: 18524 OF 2017

¶307

Between:

¶308

1 . Union of lndia, rep by its Secretary, Dept. of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi.

¶309

The Central Administrative Tribunal, rep by its Registrar. Principal Bench, New Deihi.

¶310

The Central Administrative Tribunal, rep by its Registrar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad.

¶311

...PETITIONERS

¶312

AND

¶313

G.Sudhaker, S/o. Late G.Rangaiah, aged 53^years, Photocopier, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, R/o. 20-2-64, Old Kabutarkhana, Hussain-i-Alam, Hyderabad.

¶314

.RESPONDENTS

¶315

Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records^pertaining to common order dated 8-7-201 6 in OA.No.731 of 2014 of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and quash the same as illegal, a(bit.a(y, contrary [o law and unconstitutional

¶316

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 22605 0F 20171

¶317

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^pe(ition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of common order dated B-/-2016 in OA.No.731 of 2O14

¶318

passed by the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad, pending writ petition

¶319

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEpUTy SOLICTTOR

¶320

GENERAL OF INDIA

¶321

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M VENKANNA

¶322

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR STIAVILT AND

¶323

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶324

W.P.Nos.23O95 OF 2016 3446r OF 2016 36422 0F 2016 42L24 0F 2016, 4637A OF 2016, 46762 0F 2016, 4680() 0F 20L6, 163 0F 20L7, LgL OF 2017, 507^()F 20L7.664 0F 20t7 7A7 0F 2017 788 0F 2017 80r oF 2017 1375 0F 20L7 5150 0F 2017 579t OF 20L7 18516 0F 2017 AND LA524 0F 20L7

¶325

COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Juslice Abhinand Kumar SLnuili)

¶326

A11 these Writ Petitions are being disposed of by way of this common order as the issue raised in these Writ Petitions is one and the same.

¶327

For convenience, the facts in W.P.No.18516 of 2Ol7 are hereunder discussed.

¶328

W.P.No.18516 of 2Ol7 is {rled aggrieved by the orderS passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.5B3 of 2014 d1.08.07 .20t6.

¶329

Heard learned Deputy Solicitor General of [ndia appearing for the petitioners and Sri A. Raghu Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶330

Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing ior the petitioners has corrtended that the respondent has approached the Tribunal by contending that the petitioners have extended

¶331

.{I(S,J & RITN,,I ,v!'No.23095 c..2016 & baich

¶332

¶333

frnancial Lltlgradation jn accordance with i.he Modiftrd Assur.ed Cerreer- Pi'ogressiou scheme (hereiitafter rei-eri:ed to as;^.,MACpS,) ald he wantcd the finalcial upgraCation i.n the gracle pay of the next promor-ional post as envisaged in Assurr:d Career Progressior-r Scheme (hereinafter r cferred trr as "ACpSi,,) and the Tribunai r.vas pleasecl to allorv the O.A. by directing ihe petitioners to sraltt the grade pay of the ncr:i prcmotional posl 3s en','isaged ii-r ACPS r,vithout appreciating the fact that MACpS contemplatcs oniy for grant of financial up.gr-adation of pay to the next gracie pay but not in the next prcrnotional post. The I.{ACPS wzrs introduced in supcrsession oi ACpS arrd when once I,IA.CPS has r:ome into cffecl_, tl-re question of extending fir^rancial upgradatiorr in the grade pay to the next pr-omotionai trost would not arise. The upgradation to next prornotional posr is envisaged in ACPS. This fact was not appreciated b,7 the Tribun.al ancl the issue whether the financial upgraciation has to be granted iir the next graCe pay or to the grade pay of next prcmotional. post, u,as consiCered b-y the Hon'ble Apex Court i,;i lJnion af India Vs. M.V. Mchanan Ncz-irl and the Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt s.ith the issue and came to a conclusion that as per N.ACpS, an

¶334

:020 i-i) sCC l: I

¶335

AKS,J & RRN,J WP No.23095 of 2016 & batch

¶336

¶337

employee is entitled only for financial upgradation of pay to the next grade pay but not to the grade pay of the next^promotional post. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further contended that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble^{Supreme Court} ro M.V, Mohanan lVair's case (supra), all the Writ Petitions are deserved to be allowed.

¶338

Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent^has contended that all the O.As. were a-llowed by the^{Tribunalsubject} to the outcome of the SLP, which was pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. Now, the Hon'ble Apex Court has^already adjudicated the matter against the respondent and,^therefore, appropriate orders may be passed in accordance^{with law.}

¶339

This Court, having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective^parties, is of^the considered view that the view taken by the Tribunal is contrary to the law laid dorm by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in^{M. V.} Mohanan Ncir's case (supra) and therefore, follorn'ing the said decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, all the \tr/rit^Petitionsare deserved to be allowed.

¶340

¶341

A KS,J & R[{N..I VzP No.23095 of2016 & btrch

¶342

B. Accorciingly, ail the Writ pctitions a1-e allo,,ved b1, 3s111.* aside the orders passcd l.ry^.rhe Tribunai ;n C.A.No.Sg3 of 2O\4 dt.O8.07.2Ll 16 in W.P.No.1A516 of 2AlT, rl.A. Nc.ZO2 cf 2At4 clt. 14.1t).20i5 in \r.p.No.3446I of 2016, i).i,. No.11:27 of 2014 dt. 10.03.20 16 in w.p.No.507 0f 2017, O.A. No.91 0f 2015 dt. 18.03.2016 in W.P.No.787 of 2Ot7, O.A..Nc.6412 of 2Ot4 Ct.08.07.20 16 in 1tr/.P.No.5T9t of 2OtZ, O.A. No.92 of 2Ci5 dt. 18.03.20 16 in W.P.No.664 of 20 17, O.A.No.1130 of 2Ot4 dt. 10.O3 20 16 in W.P.No.738 of 2017, O.A.No.i125 of 2Ai4 dt. 1C.03.20.i6 in W.P.ltro.SCi of 20',7, .I].A.No.8512 of 2OlS dt.C1.06.2C15 in W.P.No. 1375 of 20 17. O.,rr.No.63,B of 2Ol4 dr. 16.10.20 15 irl w.p.t.io.36422 0f 2016, .J.A.iio. Ilo7 0f^.;ai4 dt. 18.09.20 14 in w.p.No.42l24 0t 2016, O.A.No.639 0f 20i4, dt.i5.10.20 I5 in W.P.l.to.5l50 of 20tZ, O.A.I,io.tt29 of 20t4, dr. 10.03.2016 in w.p.No.4637a c:f 2015, O.A.No.9il of 2015 dt. 18.O3.2016 in W.p-No.46762 cf 20 1Cr, ().A.trlo.tl26 of 20t4, dt. 10.03.20i6 irr W.P.No.46800 of 2Ot6, t.).A.No.1t32 of 2Ot4, dt. 10.c3.2016 in w.p.No. 163 0f 20i7, o.A.No.112€, of 2014, dt. 10.03.20i6 in W.P.No. 191 of 2017, O.A.No.Z3l of 2014, dt.08.07.20 16 in w.p.tJo.18524 and O.A.No.706 of 2014.

¶343

dt. 14.1O.2015 in W.P.No.23O95 of 20 16. No costs.r\

¶344

AI(S.J & RRN,.I wP No.23095 of 20t6 & barch

I I

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶349

That Rule Nisi has been made ab-so_rute_with regard to w.p. Nos. 23095, 34461, 36422,42124 & 46762 of2016, 163, 664, 788,801-, 1375 & 5150 of 2017

¶350

Witness the Hon'ble the Chief Justice UJJAL BHUYAN, on this Thursday, The Sixth Day Of July Two Thousand And Twenty Three

¶351

//TRUE COPY//

¶352

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶353

'=Jd)

¶354

SECTION OFFICER

¶355

To, , 1 One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KU[,4AR DEpUTy SOL|C|TOR GENERAL oF tNDtA [OPUC]

¶356

2 One CC to SRI. A. RAGHU KUMAR Advocate IOPUCI 3 One CC to SRI M. VENKANNA Advocate [OpLjC] 4 Two CD Copies

¶357

KKS LS

HIGH COURT

I
ll I

DATED:0610712023

COMMON ORDER

t STAIE oA
(
cl
5 o [B stt r@
I
I g'i

¶363

WRIT PETITION NO: 23095. 34461,36422. 42124. 46378, &762 & 46800 0F 2016, 163,191,507,664 787,788.801 ,1375,5150. 5791.18 516, & 18s24 0F 2017

¶364

ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITIONS

¶365

oj
)r-
-\ r-i
r\ \ "

Union of India rep by its Secretary to the Govt., v. G.v.Rama Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India rep by its Secretary to the Govt., v. G.v.Rama Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner, Vs Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal

C.E.O.,the Zilla Praja Parishad, Sangareddy,Medak Dist Vs D.Ramesh, and 4 Others

A.Dinakar Babu IAS and 5 othes Vs Ms. Radha Chauhan, IAS

Union of India rep by its Secretary to the Govt., Vs a.Tirumala Ajai

C Narayana, R.R. Dist Vs Prl Secy, Education (Se-C and Tbp), Hyd and 6 Ot

Union of India, Secy to Govt. of India. New Delhi and 2 Others Vs A.K. Samal, Hyd and Ano