Writ petition filed seeking direction to bank to dispose of representation regarding delayed gratuity interest payment. Court directed bank to act within eight weeks.
Directed the respondent bank to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2011 regarding delayed gratuity interest within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
i i I
I ! Ij :
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4300 0F 2013
Between:
f.Qa-nllin4i Mallika,Wo B. Nageswar Rao,Agedabout 62 years, Retired Up),R/o H.l,lo.1 7-1-391 Nl 8; Saraswathi Nagar, Saidaba'd, Hyderabad 500 059.
^S
...PETITIONER
AND
The A.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director,Troop Bazar, Hyderabad- 5O0 001.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot lle Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent with regard to nonpayment of interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and violative of law laid down in 2001(6) SCC 687,2001(9) SCC 477 and further viotative of rights guaranteed under Article 16 attd 21 of the Constitution of lndia
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 3IWPfUP. NO: 5365 OF 201 3)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tlrc High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent herein to dispose off the representation d1.6.12.2011 seeking payment of interest on the delayed payment of gratuity pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. MALLIK Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. KOMAT REDDY VENKAT NARSIMHA REDDY, (SC FOR AP STATE CO OPERATTVE BANK LTD) The Court made the following: ORDER
I
f I Ii i 1 l! z i I I
I I I I I fl
iii ii ij
THE HON'] ILE SRI JUSTICE NAMA.VARAPU RI.IESHWAR RAo
WRIT PETITION No.43OO of 20 1,3
ORDER:
TIrs \ r t petition is liled under Arti<:le 226 of Cor-r stitution of Indra 1;: r.ring this court to issue ir. wnt of Mandamus dcclaring rl e inaction of the respondent. q,ith regard to nonpaymenr of i-rterest on the delayed payment ,.rf l1ratrrity and violirtivo c,l' e'.r, laid clou,n in 20Ol(6)SCC 6a7, 210 t(9)SiCC 477 and fur-ther vrolative ol rights guaranteed und,:r Articlt: 16 and 2l o1'tlrr:t-l< n:;titution ol India.
2
the r,.:presentation made by the petitioner. euestionirg the same, the present writ petition is filed.
5 \ccordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
l'ending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
close( I
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTA]'{REGISTRAR //TRUE GOPY/I w SECTTON OFFICER
HIGH COURI
DATED:28107t2023
ORDER
4<_-ai;i S-tA Ic
,t*
i"
.,
2 ') [U$ ?$8
:i .-/l:
t ..;/
t/
WP.No.4300 of 2013
DISPOSING( IF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
.J-fi
@6'"' s\A-'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bank should be directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding delayed gratuity interest.
Whether the inaction of the respondent regarding non-payment of interest on delayed gratuity is violative of law.
Mallika, W. B. Nageswar Rao
A.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Namavarapu Raeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
