The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging land record entries and issued directions to close related miscellaneous petitions with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; related miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT
[3168 I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4282I OF 2022
Between:
Golusula Ramulu, S/o Nagaiah, Occ. agriculture R-/o Akkerajpaly H/o Ammapur village. Narmetta rnandal, Jangaon District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RtrSPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Higli Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandanus declaring the action of the respondents in incorporating the name of the respondent No 5 in dharani portal for the land in survey No. 124lE extent 0.37 gts lituated at Ammapur village, Narmetta Mandal, Jangaon District by deleting the name of the petitioner even though the E pass books vide Khata No. 158 are subsisting without issuing any notice and even after the application No. ROS021602439727 filed by the respondent No. 5 for regularization of sadabainama is rejected ot 1016.12017 and further action of the respondent no. 4 in entertating the document for registration of the sale deed as arbitrary and illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14, l6 and 300A of constitr.rtion of India and contrary to the provisions of the AP Rights in lands and pattaar pass books Act 1971 and rules consequently to cancel the illegal entries and restore the name of the petitioner in dharani portal
IA NO: I OF 2022
Petition under Section 15I CPC praying that iu ihe circumstances stated in tl.re alfldavit filed in sr.rpport of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased direct the respondent No 4 not to entertain any document for the land in survey No. 124lE extent
Ac 0.37 gts situatedat Ammapur village,NarmettaMandal,Jangaon Districtpending w disposal of the mainwrit Petition,
Counsel for thePetitioner(s):SRl. ERRI RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE
IA NO: 2 OF 2022
Between:
Golusula Sammakka,Wo late G.Kumaraswamy,occ' house wife R'/o H'No'I -67' a[i".";futty FVo Ammapurvillage, Narmetta mandalJangaonDistrict'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTSNo. I to 4
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the Highcourt may be pleased to vacate the Interim orderspassad in WP.No.42821 of 2022dated28ll1l2022 -
Counsel for the Petitioner:GP f'OR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents2 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentNo.l: SRI.ERRI RAVINDER REDDY
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION N0.42821 of 2022
QRPER:
Mr Erri Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in the Writ Petition shali stand closed.
SD/.I(SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// \
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI. ERRIRAVINDERREDDY Advocate IOPUCI
I
HIGH COURT
KL,J
DATBD:24/01/2023
1 r-l S 14 14:
( o
o
02 r[B 20u] a !)
* *
ORDER
WP.No.4282l of 2022
WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COST
Golusula Ramulu
State of Telangana
Golusula Sammakka
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
