A retired police Sub-Inspector petitioned for regularization of services from his 1985 promotion, claiming violation of an APAT order dated 03.01.2014. The High Court directed the respondents to implement the order within two months.
Respondents directed to implement APAT order dated 03.01.2014 within two months of receipt of copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
i I i I I l E I t i I I ;i i I I i I I L I I i
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETHDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEJ. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:42804 0F 2017
Between:
lvlohd. Khaia. s/o MohdBasheeruddin.aged about63 years, occ Retired Sub i'i.p".t"i "ii;.tice, ftyOerauaOCityPolice, R/o'Mehidipatnam,Hyderabad'
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition UnderArticle 226 of lhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue awrit, order or directlon more in the natureof Wdt of Mandamus, directingthe respondents to passorders for regularization of the services of thepetitionerherein from the date of his promotionin 1985 and to grant all consequentialpromotions thereonas was directed by the HonbleA.P. AdministrativeTribunal vide orders03.o1 .2014 in o.A. No.57',t3/2008by declaring the action of the respondentsin not doing so as illegal'
|.A.NO:1 OF 2017(WPMP.NO:53090oF 20't7l
Petition under section151 cPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiledin supportof the petition' the High Court may be pleasedto direct the respondentsto pass ordersas directed by the Hon',bleTribunalvide orders dt. 03.01.20'14in o.A.No.57t 3/2008within a fixed time, pending disposal of the main writ Petition.
Counsel forthe Petitioner : SRI K.ANANTHA RAO Counsel for theRespondents : GP FOR SERVICES -l, SRIM'V'RAMA RAO'SPL G'P The Court madethe followingORDER
j i I i I i I I I I I j
I I I I I
HO.V'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
lvRlalpTfTIow !iq-a?€ea c,f 20t7
ORDER
This.r,rr.r- pcr.ition is lllcci sccking lirlios,ir s r.i:lir:f
'''..io sslio a \vrlt order ot- (llraCtl()n l}lor (j,lt 1_hc r]lllut.c ',1 Wr it ,), :!1.,,d ,..u\ (,1 pass )rcc.s io. ..g,,t".irJL,:,;]":r'Ji; ; ?::::' ijl.,,]: pe'jticnr:r hercin lrorr.i the lL;rte. of- f ri" g,.,,,rrlu ;a ,'i._, 1985 a:-rd to graltl nll ,:h:,:eo1 as *i"- ,,,..,,,,".1 "'l]i,""ullt"']r,,,,',';i: " iil Adminislrativc.t.r bunai llrtr, ordcr.s 1)3 t1;i r. 'ir; O.A.Nc..57l3/2OOt i)_y rler:lrrnntl ttr. .,. ,.r,. ,,f Lfr.i rcsponlet-tts iri not cJoirrg s(); s illcgai
2 Hcard S, i K. AnanLh;r Il:rc;, lcar.rrr..ci coulls,,l ,irr. the petitioner ar d learncd AssistanL (]ovcr:rrrLcrti lrl ::tclr:r lor Home(Scrvict.s I appeari]lg frrr i-Cspondt:nl Nos.2 :.3
=.ry
7
Samewasallou,cdon03.0l.,2O14wlrcreilrresporrdents wercd.irectedtoCountLheser-riorityofthepetitionerintl-Ie category ofSub lns;pectorof Police from the date of his promotion onout of senioritybasis witl-r all consequential benefits, includingprornotion to the next highercategory' as per hiseligibilit5', seniorityand pass 'lpprcpriateorders r,vithin aperiodof four u'ceks frorn the clate of receiptof the said order
4 . Learnedcounsel for the petitioner vehemently contendeclttrat thoughAPAT allowedtheO Aon O3.O 1.2O 14thcrespondcnts have not implementedthe orders andttre action of respondentsis clear violatiorrof orders ofAPAT.
5 LearnedAssistantGovernmentPleader basing orr the instructions furnistredby theconcerned officers of submitsthat three(3) months tirne rnay be respondents, granted to irnplementthe orders passedby APAT dated 03.o1.2014
6.[nviewoftheabovesubmissions,rnlithoutgoinginto the otheraspects of the case' the respondents are directed to irnplementthe orders passecl by APAT in O'A'No'5713
of 2OO8 dated O3.O1.2014 ,,vithin a pr_.rior.i rf 1u.o(2) ;nonths from the date of reccipt of a copl. c I 1 i e ,t -clr:r.
7 . Accordingl-v, the r,r.rji pctition 1S dispos,rC ot'. Nc
CoStS.
As a se 1uei, miscellaneous petitions, pr:r-r<[i: rg I an_v, shali sta,nd c osed
sD/' P.ch.fIAGA 3HUSHAME}4 ASSIS;T,\DE-REGISTRAR //rRUE coPY/, ,r,Ff;3r.roFFlcER
SA GJP t.'a
HIGH COURT
DATED:20109i2023
ORDER
_------::=:^<br>, -' '.. ,:' ,, . r'.t S i/t;--'').. |; / -/...\r}.
^ 4;<br>t:
t', 200[TIm
"-.:/
WP.No.42804'tf 2017
DISPOSING OI: THE W.P
WITHOUT COS;TS.n
Dw
,tr)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents failed to implement the Administrative Tribunal order directing regularization of petitioner's services from the date of promotion.
Whether a fixed time limit should be granted to the respondents to comply with the Tribunal's order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd. Khaia
The State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
