The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s. Pavan Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. as infructuous because the challenged tender notification was from 2018 and the petitioner was not in contact with their counsel.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HOI'IOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.ITADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 41933 OF 2018
Between:
M/s. Pavan Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., Sy.No.246, Gagan Pahad, Hyderabad -501323 Rep. by its Managing Director, Bajrang Prasad Gupta.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing proceeding, daled 27 .O8.2O18 in No. CH and FW-l 202 1 ( 31 )l 1 I 2O1 8- ALL/MHN-CH and FW whereby it cancelled the Tender Notification dated: 13.01 .2018 which culminated into the agreement entered into with the petitioner dated 13.08.2018 as unfair, unreasonable, arbitrary and violative of naturaljustice and to set aside the same and issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to supply the Mother Care Kits in terms of Agreement dated 13.08.2018.
A NO: 1 OF 20'18
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the 2nd respondent daled 27.08.2O18 in No.CH&FW12021(31)1112O18-ALL/MHN-CH&FW whereby it cancelled the Tender Notification dated 13.01 .2018 which culminated into the agreement entered into with the petitioner dated 13.08.2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 201i
Between:
Maa Yarn and Fit res, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, C. Sure sh Bacu, S/o. Lokeswar Rao, 41 ed about 38years, R/o. D. No. 5-60-18/A Thi..l lan(),Ashok Nagar, Guntur - 522 0O7 , Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
..PETITIONER/PROP(fSED Flt:SPONDENT NO.3
AND
... RESPONDEN IA^/RIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/FIESPCtll)Et\lTS NO.1 and 2
Petition ur der Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir:umstances stated in the affidavit filec in support of the petition, the High Cour rnay be pleased to implead Maa Yari and Fibres, Rep by its Authority Signatory C. Srresh Babu S/o Lokeswar Rao, aJed about 38 years, Rl/o .No.5-60-18/A, thirJ lane,, Ashok Nagar, Guntur - 522( 07 , Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh as llrd respondent in W.P.No.41933 ol 2018 and Misc.Petitions also.
Counsel for the 'etitioner: SRl. VEDULA SRINIVAS
Counsel for the,roposed Respondent No.3: SRl. S. DILIP.,AYA RAM,
The Court made the following: ORDER
TT{E IIONOURAI}I,F], SMT. JI.JS-[ICI.- P" NIADHAVT D}.]VI
WIIIT I'I,TITION NO.4I933 OF 20I8
oRDt,tR
'l'he leamed Senior Counsel appearing fol the petitioner, Sri Vedula Srinivas, submits that the Writ Petition has become intiuctuous as the tender notification, which has been challenged in this Writ Petition, is of the year 201 8. He further submits that the petitioner is also not in contact with the learned counsel.
No order as to costs.
stand closed.
SDIG.SIREESHA ASSISTAN'EEGISTRAR QD /ffRUECOPY' SECTIONOFFICER
To,
i.fl r^j,,td']?l#rffi*'.J,"$,..d113;;1t*!'i"'n""n' 4. TwoCD CoPies TJ SW
Vy
HIGH COUF T
DATED:021|t112.023
./ .u-N
31 JA'l ?oi:l <br>,n,
ORDER
WP.No.41933 of 2018
DISMISSII{G'IHE WRIT PETITION AS INITRU ]TIJOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
:f L.?rr4 +ffis
M/s. Pavan Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.
State of Andhra Pradesh
The Commissioner of Health and Family Welfare
P. Itadnavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
