High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the subject matter had ceased to subsist, without assessing costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Spe._cial Original Jurisdiction)
IVIONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:41342 oF 2015
Between:
...PETITlONERS
)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, dated 26.03.2012 in O.A No. 9866/2011 and to quash the same.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 53370 OF 2015 )
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal dt. 26.O3.2012 in O.A No. 986612011, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF
/!'MP. NO:202OF 20161
Between:
lqbal Ahrned. tilo. lr,/ohd Abdul Ali, Occ Retd.l/c. Executi,re Enr;ineer Neelam Sanjeeva Rr:d ly Srisailam Project. Gagan Vihar, Flyderab;'d, tVo. 13-6434 I c I 1 0o' lr4z'uthi nasar' Mehd ipatnam' Hvderab:rd'
AND
n =sdJlrEJlrnl?Triy
...I?ESPONDENT/ 2,d RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir::urrstances stated in the affidavit filed-r support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to vacate the interinr r rclers granted in W.P.M.P.No. 51370 o1. 2O15 in W.P.No. 41342 of 2015, date, 22.12.2015.
Counsel for the Peti ioners: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Res rondent No.1: SRI D.BALA KISHAN RArf Counsel for the Res )ondent No.2: ---
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.41342 OF 2OLs
ORDER: (Per AKS,])
Learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the petitioners has informed the Court that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition,
shall stand closed.
SD/. G.SIREESHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
/ffRUECOPY// SECTIO OFFICER
to .,. t*o ccs to Gp FoR SERVICES-|, High court for the State of Telangana'at Hvderabad' [OUTI ,. 6'":,=cti;'shro'6nr-nKIsHANRAo'AdvocatetoPUCl
PSK. avJ
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:10107'2,023
ORDER
WP.No.41342 <tf 2015
('i\E, ll f,q f e
l'.
ii; 14 NJE 2tr8
..
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCT JOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
v?
l"
-r
The State of Telangana
Iqbal Ahmed
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
