Writ petitioner challenging the State of Telangana and police officials regarding punishment of postponement of increment and pension based on dismissal of a previous identical writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition without costs.
Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3383 ]
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO: 41333 OF 2017
Between:
Md. Shafiuddin, S/o Shamsuddhin Ali Aged about 58years, Retired Arrned Reserve Sub-l nspector Karimnagar, R/o Karimnagar
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction,more particularlyone in the nature of a writ of Mandamusby declaringthe actionof the 6th, 4th and 3rd respondents in imposing thepunishmentof postponementof incrementfor two (2) years with effect on lutureincrementsand pension and confirmingthe same ,i6" cr.fO 13/PR/OE/99(DO No.2OOt2oOo)dated07-02-2000' CNo' 195/APP/2000(R.O. No.570/2000) dated 11-10-2000and L. Dis' No 12otA3lPR.2o12(z.o.o.No.05/2013)dated09-01-2ol3respectively,aSbeing ,rbitr.ry, erroneous,unjust, d ispropo rtionateand in violationof Article14 of the constituiion of lndiaand consequently hold -be -paldthat the petitioner is entitled. to have r,i. p"nrion re-fixedand arrearsof ..revisedpay and pension duly reguiarizingthe suspension period as on duty with all attendant benefits
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRI' V' RAVTCHANDRAN
Counselfor the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICESI
The Courtmadethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYAIYA ALISHEITTY
ORDER:
P N NO.4 13330F ?ot7
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government pleader for Services -l placed on record the order passed in W.p.No.606 of 20tZ,dated 31.O7.2023.
closed.
I
ASs'sfAD(,:IRlEigffiH //TRUE COPYII 1 secnorvBiprcen 2. igh Court for the State of Telangana, at 3. Advocate tOpUCl ${frTt#5rH'm:l 7 GJP
To,
{
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2O11112023
ORDER
WP.No.41333of 2017
1v. 6 STA ]r4-
(
)
6l
L) 1s DEt Zii'B
* i;E s., .'
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS
w(.r
l9
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition seeking declaration of action as arbitrary, erroneous, unjust, and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Whether to grant relief for re-fixation of pension, pay, and regularization of suspension as on duty.
Md. Shafiuddin
The State of Telangana
The Director General of Police, Telangana
The Inspector General of Police, NorthZone Hyderabad
The Inspector General of Police, Warangal
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Karimnagar Range
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
