Mr. Shailesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India and 3 others
Telangana HCWP/41003/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of LOC via two writ petitions. Counsel sought permission to withdraw WP with liberty to file afresh. Court granted liberty and dismissed WP as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
¶2
[3168 ]
¶3
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT ..-
¶4
THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSTIMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 41003 OF 2022
¶5
Between:
¶6
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Agarwal, S/o. Gajanand Agarwal, Occ: Business R/o.E-105, Sethi Towers, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad.
¶7
a--
¶8
...PETITIONER
¶9
AND
¶10
- Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Rep by its Secretary, Govemment of India, New Delhi.
¶11
- Directorate ofEnforcement, Hyderabad Zonal Office, Buddha Bhavan, Hyderabad.
¶12
- Bureau of [mmigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govemment of India, Represented by its Commissioner [mmigration.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shailesh Kumar Agarwal
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
K Lakshmin
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/41003/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court