'QrrrIc lrtrqr, nunittr ll llct'slns uere employetl as condr.rctors, drirvrs rtr sltrutuiks, itt tht yt,tr 1999, itt pursuance of n nolifcatiorr rssrir,l J()r llus purlp5g.'l'l:lt, tt,ttificntion itself is marle it clear thnt tht sclrttL{ cartltr tks tuouli bt, rrltltLtittk'd on daily utage hasis irt itially anLt lltt,ir sLri,iccs uturlLl bt rcgulnnsttl, m due course. For aaiety of reasons, tht protess of n,gultrt'isntion did uot tnke place till tlu Got)ermant ncavded apprttt'al atd ye rnlission t h ntLgh G.O.Ms.No,2gS, dated 0S.10.2007. Qttitct krry nttntbar of cmltloyeL,s tucre regulaixrl, in purunnce of tle soirl ordts.'l'lLc cnsts of tlp ltttttto ers tpere not considered in ternts of C.t) A,4s.No.2,!5, ttor dirl thc ltllittlttcrs feel antl gielana: at tlnt tinrc..ftpg Vearslok'r. thc Ootternnrnt atcorded parnission for regularisation of tlt seru[es of tht: h,ft ot,er entpl<rya:s. Consequential orrlers, hmueuer, uert issutd diruling regulurisntiorr ruitlt eflcct t'rom U.02.2010 i.a. thc dnte of C.O. Once it ls lot ilt Llisltute thnl tlle petitioners are appointari initialhl in lhe year 1999, anLl tlu,ir felktr enryloyees ruere regularised. in temrs of C.O.Ms.No.2,S5 datd 05j10 2a07. there is no reason to deny tfunr tlrc bencJit tltrtof. It ilas nlt otl atrcunl o.f any fault or det'ect on the part of ttt petititttrtrs, lhat tlty lotre ot ettt,nltLl tlrc beneft under G.O.Ms.No.2gS.
