Writ petition regarding illegal appointments of three office subordinates by A.P. GENCO was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Counsel for petitioner sought time once, but appeared empty-handed on the next date.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t,
[3167 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 36599 OF 2012
Between:
Telangana Electricity Employees' Association, Regd. No.61/2005, Rep. by its President, Kishan Singh Thakur, S/ o Narayan Singh, Agei 63 yrs, Occ:- President of TEEA, O/o D. No.'14-3-237, Goshamahal, Begumbazai, Hyderibad -tZ.
...PETITIONER
AND
( W.P. stands dismissed as against forthe Respondent Nos.6, 7 & 8.)
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia piaying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction rlore particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 1 to 5 in issuing appointment orders to the Respondents No.6 to 8 vide Memo No.GM(A)/ DS(PyAS(R/PO-A|A2l735l 2004, dated 02-O9-2oo4 and Memo No.cM(A)/ DS(P)/ AS(Ry PO-A/A2|41812004, dated 07-6-2004 respectively and continuing them as
employees of the RespondentNo. 'l iCorporation without taking any action on the representation dated 09-11-2012 ot the Petitioner/Association as illegal, arbitrary, violation ofprinciples ofnaturalJustice andviolationof recruitmentrules of the Respondent No.1/Corporationand violation of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the RespondentsNo. 1 to 5 to dismiss the Respondents 6 to8 forthwith.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2012(WPMP.NO: 46462oF 20121
Petition under Section151 cPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased to direct the RespondentNo.2 to pass appropriate orders on the Representationof the petitioneriAssociation dated 09.11.2O12.
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRl. P.S.P. SURESH KUMAR (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1to 5: SMT V. UMADEVI
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PET.IILON No. 36599 of 2012
ORDER:
On 28.03.2023, when the present Writ petition was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has directed the Registry to list the present Writ Petition on 04.04.2023 under the caption ,For Dismissal,. On 04.04.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought time for filing an appropriate application, therefore, the matter was adjourned to today. Today, when the present Writ petition is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to the above, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present Writ petition.
Accordingly, the present Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. K.SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// secrr6'{uorrrcen
To, 1. One CC to SRl.P.S.P. SURESHKUMAR,Advocate[OPUC] Z. One CC to SMT.V. UMADEVI,Advocate [OPUC]
CHR GJP cts-
l
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010412023
s rt
a >'- oN
=
,o sJ<br>o
/.-,?: tlo ,
ORDER
W.P.No.36599 of2012
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
"+.r.te
Telangana Electricity Employees' Association
The A.P. GENCO
Sri Vudayagiri Maddeeswara Reddy
Sri O. Vengal Reddy
Sri B. Ravi Kumar
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
