Partly allowed

Smt. G. Aruna v. The Joint Collector

Telangana HC6 Jul 2023WP/35091/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 35091 of 2012 along with its associated interim orders and miscellaneous petitions, dismissing them as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedies.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 35091 of 2012 and connected petitions; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.

Smt. G. Aruna Vs The Joint Collector — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

132521

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Spectat Originat Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶6

l.A.No.1 of 2023

¶7

IN/AND

¶8

WRIT PETITI ON NO:3 5091 0F 2012

¶9

WRIT PETIn N NO: 10F 12 Between:

¶10

Smt. G. Aruna, W/o G. Rain Reddy, Aged about 42 yrs, Occ:House hold

¶11

Smt. Rukkamma, Wo Rukkaiah, aged about 75 years; Occ:House hold

¶12

Late G. Srinivas, S/o G. Narsimulu, aged about 48 years; Occ: Business

¶13

B. Venkatesh, S/o Late Krishnaiah, aged about 43 years; Occ: Employee

¶14

Smt. Maqboolunnisa Begum, Wo Syed Ahmaduddin, aged about 56 yrs; Occ: House hold

¶15

Smt. Seelhamma, Wo Krishnaiah, aged about 5g years; Occ: House hold

¶16

Smt. Cheruku Jyothi, Wo Cheruku Manohar. 48 yrs; Occ: House hold

¶17

B. Smt. Anasuyamma, Wo Balaswamy aged about 55 years: Occ:House hold I 9Tt. Puri Annapumamma, Wo Ramaswamy, aged about 60 yrs: Occ:House hold

¶18

10.Sri Pola Srinivasulu, S/o. Ramswamy, aged about 50 years; Occ:Business 1 1 . Sri Bachu Murali, S/o Thirtipathaiah, aged about 45 years; Occ:Business 12. Sri V. Dharmaraju, S/o Rangaiah, aged about 55 years: Occ:Business

¶19

13.Abdul Khadar, S/o. Raheem aged 55 years, Occ:Business

¶20

14.K.Krishna Reddy, S/o. K.Ranga Reddy aged 50 years, Occ:Business

¶21

Dontu Vijayalaxmi, W/o. Dontu Balaswamy, aged 40 years, Occ:House hold All R/o Kalwakurthy Village & Mandal, Mahboobnagar District.

¶22

...PETITIONERS

¶23

AND

¶24

1 . The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar District,

¶25

The Revenue Divisional fficer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District.

¶26

The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kalwakurthy Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

¶27

4 The Superinter ding Engineer (R & B), circre Maharrubna,la r, tvrahabubnagar

¶28

The Executi'ze !rrgineer (R&B) Division, Karwakurthy, Marabutrnagar District

¶29

6 _T-!u 9re,r.?an rh?yat, Kalwakurthy Village & Mand;rl, Maharcubnagar District, rep. by its Villa ;e Secretary.

¶30

,..RESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia p.aying that in the circumstances state, r n the affidavit fired therewith, the r-rir;h'r:o'u.t ,av't" pLeased to issue any writ, order or direction; more particurarr,/, on. in the nature of a writ of Mandam rs decraring the action of the Responde nts irr purportinf to randomly use t-and :r croachment Act and defeat the right s rf r nl-peiition"er. over their lands and irterfere with petitioners' enjoymr:nt of ftreir properties as illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutionar and set ,.i0" tt.," sa d orcer oi tt," r.t Respondent in r;ase Io.E1r167r/2011 , dated 22.og.2o12ana att tn: pro.""iing, under the Land Encr< ar;hment Act

¶32

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(li[ PMP. NO:4 4581 0F 20121

¶33

Petition under St:ction 151 cpc praying that in :he circr.rmsrances stated in the affidavit fited ir supporr of the peiition, ine fign Court may b;;A;;1" stay all further prot et:dings in pursuance of the order par;slrr ov^{-G" -r.t} Respondent in case ro. E1t16r712011, dated 22.og.2012, perrdir,g aisposar'or the writ petition

¶34

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶35

Petition under se'ction 151 cpc praying that in the circr.mstances stated in the affidavit frted ir support of the peiition, in. Higt rlourt may frl pL".Jj" permit the Peritroner ro withdraw the present writ Fetition No lsosi Li-iotz, with liberty to avail ap rr,rpriate remedies in law.

¶36

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(W^)MP. NO:50 007 0F 20121

¶37

Between:

¶38

Supriya Found. ticn (Regn.No.1^.106/2009), Rep. by its fiecre1ary Sri Ganji Srinivas Rao, S o. Sri Ramulu, Ryo. H.No.4-6_gi;ll,t, Kaa,3r,rgh, Hayathnala'r Mandal, Ranga leddy District - 501 505.

¶39

.PETITIONER/PROPOSED R E$iPCTNDENT No.7

¶40

AND

¶41

Smt. G. Aruna, \ //r> G. Rain Reddy, Aged aboul42 yrs, Oc::llouse hold 2. Smt. Rukkamm:, !V/o Rukkaiah, aged about 75 years; Occ:l_.ous;e hold 3. Late G Srinivas S/o G. Narsimulu, aged about 48 y€rars; C c:r: B tsiness 4. B. Venkatesh, S ) _ate Krishnaiah, aged about 43 years; Ccr,: Ernployee

¶42

Smt. Maqboolunnisa Begum, W/o Syed Ahmaduddin, aged about 56 yrs: Occ: House hold

¶43

Smt. Seethamma, W/o Krishnaiah, aged about 56 years; Occ: House hold

¶44

Smt. Cheruku Jyothi, Wo Cheruku Manohar. 48 yrs; Occ: House hold

¶45

B. Smt. Anasuyamma, W/o Balaswamy aged about 55 years: Occ:House hold

¶46

9q!. Puri Annapumamma, W/o Ramaiwamy, aged about 60 yrs; Occ:House hold

¶47

10.Sri Pola Srinivasulu, S/o. Ramswamy, aged about 50 years; Occ:Business 1 1 . Sri Bachu Murali, S/o Thirtipathaiah, aged about 45 years; Occ:Business

¶48

12.Sri V. Dharmaraju, S/o Rangaiah, aged about 55 years: Occ:Business

¶49

13.Abdul Khadar, S/o. Raheem aged 55 years, Occ:Business

¶50

14.K.Krishna Reddy, S/o. K.Ranga Reddy aged 50 years, Occ:Business

¶51

'l 5. Dontu Vijayalaxmi, Wo. Dontu Balaswamy, aged 40 years, Occ:House hold Respondents No-1 ,2,4 to 15 all are Fi/o Kalwakurthy Village & Mandal, Mahboobnagar District.

¶52

...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS

¶53

The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar District,

¶54

1 7.The Revenue Divisional Offlrcer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District.

¶55

18.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kalwakurthy Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶56

19.The Superintending Engineer (R & B), Circle Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District.

¶57

20.The Executive Engineer (R&B) Division, Kalwakurthy, Mahabubnagar District.

¶58

21-The Gram Panchayat, Kalwakurthy Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, rep. by its Village Secretary.

¶59

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS No.1 to 6

¶60

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner/ proposed respondent No.7 herein as respondent No. 7 in the Writ Petition No.35091 of 2012 as well as in W.P.M.P. No. 44581 ot 2012 in W.P. No. 35091 of 2O12.

¶61

l.A. NO: I OF 2013nnruMP. NO: I 310 0F 2013) Between:

¶62

The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar District,

¶63

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District.

¶64

The Mandal Revenue Ofiicer, Kalwakurthy Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

¶65

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 3

¶66

AN D 1. Smt.. G. Aruna, Wo G. Rain Reddy,42 yrs, 2. Smt.. Rukkamma, Wo Rukkaiah, 75 years:

¶67

Late G. Srinivas, S/o G. Narsimulu, 48 years; 4. B.Venkatesh, S/o Late Krishnaiah, 43 years:

¶68

Smt MaqboolL tnisa Begum, W/o Syed Ahmaduddin, 56 ,rr:,; ti. Smt. Seetha.nr ra W/o Krishnaiah, 58 years; 8.7. Smt. Anasuyar Smt. Cheruku . rrra, yc,thi, W/o Balaswamy, W/o Cheruku Mahohar. 48 55 years: vrs:-

¶69

SmL Puri Anna ru rnamma-, W/o Rariraswimy, 60 yrr;; 10 Sri Pola Srinivz sulu, S/o. Ramswamy, 50 ye'ars; 11.Sri Bachu Murz li, S/o Thirtipathaiah,'45 yeiars;

¶70

Sri V. Dharmar rjr-, S/o Rangaiah, 55 yeirs: 13 Abdul Khadar, i7o. Raheem-,55 yeard,

¶71

14 K.Krishna Redr y. S/o. K.Ranga Reddy, 50 years,

¶72

15 Dontu Vijayalar m , W/o. Dontir Balaswimv.'40 vears. All R/o Kalwakr rthy Village & Mandal, tr/ahboobnagai Dis..rirt

¶73

16.rhe Superinter Jirrs Ensineer (R & B), cir.6'nShsifiLlr:H;lt^f]Fllll?:ff' District.

¶74

17.The Executive :ngineer (R&B) Division, Kalwakurthy,Mahal: ubnaoar District. 18.The Gram.Parnr h.yat, Kalwakurthy Viltage & Mandai, Uaf ai,uUiiEi'. Di;i;;i, !9p.^{by its Villal e Secretary.}

¶75

(Respondents '6 to^'18 are not necessary parties to this petition) ...RESPONDENTS/RE:SF,ONIDENTS 4 tO 6

¶76

Petition under sr..ction 151 cpc praying that in :he circ.rmstances stated in the affidavit frlec ir support of the petition, the High ()ourt nay be pleased ro vacate the interim on le'granted on 9-11-2012 in w.p.tr4.p.Nr,. ,iqt,al' of 2012 in W.P.No. 35091 of 20 2

¶77

Counsel for the Petit oner: SRI MALLU NETHAN REDDY

¶78

Counsel for the Resl ondent No.1 to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶79

Counsel for the ResS ondent No.4 & 5: Gp FOR ROADS & BUIL DINGS

¶80

Counsel for the Resp ondent No.6: SRt KRUPACHAND GOGIHENI

¶81

Counsel for the Prop rsed Respondent: SRI KILARU KHADAIi llAtlA

¶82

The Court made the I )ltowing: ORDER

¶83

t I

¶84

HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶85

I.A.No.1of 2O23

¶86

IN./AND

¶87

WRIT PETITION NO35O'1 OF 2012

¶88

ORDER:

¶89

Taking into consideration the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.p.No.35O91 of 2OL2 that the petitioners intend to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedies in

¶90

law, the same is ordered as prayed for.

¶91

Permission is accorded.

¶92

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to avail appropriate remedies in law. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶93

Interim order granted on 09.L1.2OL2 passed in W.P.M.P.No.445B1 of 2Ol2 in W.P.No.35091 of 2012 stands vacated.

¶94

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ

¶95

Petition, shall stand closed.

¶96

SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶97

SECTI OFF]CER

¶98

To, '!. 9ne CC to SRt MALLU NETHAN EFpD_y, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Cou( for tfre Stite olfetangana. touTl

¶99

Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS, Hish Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. {OUTI

¶100

One CC to SRI KRUPACHhND-9O_9!\IEN|, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to SRt KTLARU KHADAR BABA, Aivocate tOFUCi^-'

¶101

Two CD Copies BN

sw E&€_

HIGH COURT

DATED:06107t2023

ORDER

l.A.No.l ot 2023 IN/AND

¶107

1'.'r- ='1
-.-
lui
lr :)
ir 1

¶108

WP.No.35091 of 2012

¶109

ORDERING I HE I.A. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDR/IWN

¶110

1O
,)<br>)
\ ,k?
qa' p-

Smt. G. Aruna v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. G. Aruna v. The Joint Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Narshima Rao Vs The State Of Telangana

DrJ.M. Gurunath Vs The State Of Telangana

Shaik Mohammad Ali , Mohammad Ali Vs The State of Telangana and 16 others

Maremreddy Prathap Reddy and 12 others Vs The State of Telanana and 4 others

Kandula Laxmaiah Vs State of Telangana

P. Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana