The writ petition challenging the bank's acceptance of the petitioner's resignation from a date different from the petitioner's request is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition questioning a later order.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging a subsequent order; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s7 )
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECONDDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICEJUWADI SRIDEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 33092OF 2021
Between:
Ksheerasagar Ramesh,aged about63 yrs, S/o.KVenkoba,H No 10-7-124, Girmajipet, Warangal, AP-506002.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226ol lhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filedtherewith, the High court maybe pleased to issue any writ, order ordirectionmore particularlyin the natureof Mandamus declaring the actionon the part of the Respondent Bank in accepting the Resignation of ihePetitioner with effect from1210312018, insteadof from 3OtO4t2O18 as requestedin the resignationletter daled 12l12l2Ol7 as manifestly arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires thepowers conferreduponthe Respondent No.1 and violative of Article 14 and 16 ofthe Constitution of lndiaand consequently direct the Respondent Bank to acceptthe Resignation of the Petitioner from its service wef 30/04/2018 with all consequentialbenefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri'T.KoteswaraRao
Counsel for the Respondents: Smt.V.Uma Devi
The Court made the followingOrder :-
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDI=VI
\
WRIT PETI TION No.33O92 of2O2L
ORDER:
The petitioner is aggrieved of the action ofResponclent-Bank in accepting the Resignation with effect from12.03'2018 instead of 30.04.2018 as requested inhis ResignationLetter,dated t2.L2.20t7.
.\
,..t \ l'. ,r..|.i{191 ot lltlt
which is not direcUy chailenged in this writ petition. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition questioning the order, dated 30.09.2020, for which, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents expressed no objection.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed
To
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASStSTATtREGtsTRAR (' [:, SECTION OFFICER
1 Pn" 99to Sri.T.KoteswaraRao, Advocate IOPUCI 9n" 99ro smt.v.umaoevi, eJvoclteliiFtitf "", J lwo CD Copies SA GJP tta..
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210812023
ORDER
WP.No.33092 of 2021
e SIA'I€ o
(
* v
t)
$ rl sEP tG
o_), ,Q
t
o
I (',
\ :i=-OES i,A.r
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
?,r.a,
s\q%e
Ksheerasagar Ramesh
Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank
Smt Justice Juwadi Sridevi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
