Allowed

Shaik Shareef v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Dec 2023WP/32715/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Telangana High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent revenue authorities to consider the petitioner's online application to rectify land entries misclassified as Laoni Patta, issuing necessary notices within two months. The petition was allowed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to consider the Dharani application for correction of revenue entries, issue notices to interested persons, and pass orders within two months.

Shaik Shareef Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Origindl Jurisdiction)

¶3

N/ONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 32715 OF 2O2t

¶7

Between:

¶8

Shaik Shareef. S/o Late Shaik Sardhar,. Aged. 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Kammeta Village, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

4 The Tahsildhar, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly more in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondenl authorities, in not issuing the Digital Patta Passbook in favor of the petitioner by consrdering the petitioner online application dated. 21 1 1012023, representation dated. t4tO8tZ0Z3 and Old Pattadhar Passbook, 1B certificate and title deed, as illegal arbitrary and against the principles of naturaljustice and in contrary to the law. Consequently to direct the respondent authonties, to issue the Digital Patta Passbook in favor of the petitioner in respect of land in Sy. -No. 2571312, extent to Ac. 2.00 gts situated at Kammeta Village. Chevella lt/landal, Ranga Reddy District by considering the online application dated. 2111012023, representation dated. 1410812023 and Old Pattadhar Passbook. 1 B certificate.

¶17

IA NO: 't^{oF 2023}

¶18

petition under sectron 151^{cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition' the High Court may be pleased} pleased to direct^{the respondent authorities'to issue the DigitalPatta Passbook} in favor^{of the petitionerin respect of landin Sy No' 2571312'extent to Ac 2 00} gts situated at^{KammetaVillage' ChevellaMandal' RangaReddyDistrict by} considering^{the online application daled'21t1012023'representationdated'} 14tOBl2O23^{and Old Pattadhar Passbook 1B certificate}

¶19

Counsel^{for the Petitioner: SRI CHALAKANI VENKATYADAV}

¶20

Counsel^{for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE}

¶21

The Court^{madethe following:ORDER}

¶22

TIIE HONOURABLE SITI JUSTICE It.^{VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.327I5 OF 2023

¶24

ORDER: (ORAL)

¶25

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seckin-e lbllowing

¶26

relief:

¶27

"... to issue an appropriate urit. order or direction more particularly rnore in tho nature o1'u rit^o{ mandamus declaring the action of rcspondctlt authorities in not issuing the l)igital l)atta^Pzrsshookin favor of the petitioner by considcring the^petitioner online application dated 21.10.2023.^{rcprcsentatiorl} dated 14.08.2023 and Old Pattadhar Passbook. lll Certificate and title deed as illegal. arbitrarl' atrd^asairtst the principles of natural^justioe and ill contrarv to thc law. Consequently to direct the respondent atttltoritics to issue the Digital Patta Passbook in [avor of^tlrc petitioner in respect of land in 51'.No.257i312 c\tcnt to Ac.2-00 gts situated at Katntneta Villagc. Chcvclla Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. b1- considcring^tltc online application dated 21.10.2011^{rcprcscnt.ttio rr} dated 14.08.2023 and Old Pattadhar I'assbtxrk.^{I l]} Certificate and title deed and^pass -.."

¶28

I-leard leamed Counsel for the^{petitioner, lcatleclAssistant}

¶29

Govemment Pleader for Revenue^{appcaringlbr rcspolltlcrtts.atrd}

¶30

perused the material on record

¶31

Petitioner clairns to be abs<lltrtc orr'ttcr^{attd p<tsscssttt oI the} land admeasuring Acs.2-00 gutltas in^{Strrre-Y' No.1-i7il,'l sittrrtcd}

¶32

¶33

at Kammela Villagc.^{ChevellaMandal, Ranga l{eddy District} Learned counscl lor^{the petitioner has submitted thatrevenue} authorities issued e-pattadar^{passbook No.T'05040141 684 where} under the extent of land^{in Survey No.257l3/2was wronglyshown} as Laoni Patla. ln^{order to rectill the same,petitionerhas} submitted online application^{bearing No-2300157464 dated} 21.10.2023 through Dhalani^portal.

¶34

Leat'ncd counsel lor the^{petitionerhas clarified that} inadverlently in the relicl^{the petitionerhas soughlfor issuance of} e-palladar passbook instead^{o1'rectiflcation of revenuc entries in} respect of the subject land. Grievatrce^{ol the petitioner is that} subject land is rwongly enterecl^{as l-trrtrti Patta il-r the e-pattadar} passbook and title deed and shc^{has subrlitted onlineapplication} through Dharani^{pofialftrr rectillcation ol'the saue, however,there} is inaction on the^parl ol-^{t'esponclent atrthorities in processingthe} application. Ilence, hc is constraincd^{to apltroach this Court'}

¶35

Learucd Assistatrt^(iore tltnctrt ['[eader for^Revenue appearing lbr rcspor-rdcrrts has sutruitteil that^{approirriateaction}

¶36

¶37

will be taken on the Dharani application submitted by the

¶38

petitioner, in accordance with law

¶39

Recording the aforesaid submission of the leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue, rvithout going into the merits of case, the writ petition is disposed ol directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the Dhalani application bearing No.2300157464 dated 21 .10.2023 submitted by the petitioner for correction of revenue entries/entry in er-pattadar passbook-cum-title deed of the petitioner showing the Iand ol thc pctitioner admeasuring Acs.2-00 guntas ln Sun ey No.2 5 7/i/2 situated at Kammeta Village, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Rcddy District, as "Laoni Patta", by issuing notice to all conce med/interested persons, and pass orders, in accordance with law'. u.ithin a pcriod of two (2) months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.

¶40

As a secluel thcreto, miscellaneous applications,

¶41

if any. pending in the rvrit petition stand closed. No order as to

¶42

costs. 'l SD/.A.V.S.^PBASAD ASSISTANT^REGIflTRAR //TRUE^COPY// SECTIONryFFICER

¶43

To, lm$:*'+,urm Hvderabad. IOUT]^l

¶44

Hvderabad. IOUT]IOUT] 7 ulwo.CD^CoPies

¶45

HIGH COURT

¶46

DATED:04 t12t2023

¶47

{ t\ TA A
qA
J
,l
D 1 1 0E C 023 lo
,t c i
Es PA5 i: Hf
:J

¶48

ORDER

¶49

WP.No.32715 of 2023

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶51

\D
-ri<br><br>)x-{

Shaik Shareef v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Shareef v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Agarwal Vs The State of Telangana

Abul Faiz Mohammed Asim Mehdi Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Boyapally Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Nagarapu Raghupathi Reddy and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 13 Others

Kandula Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sri.Rai Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana