The High Court of Telangana considered a writ petition seeking a direction for land survey. The petition was closed because the underlying F-Line application was rejected due to a title dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3256I
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY .THE TWENTYTHIRDDAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:3062OF 2023
Between:
S. Nusavr Azam, S/olateWasif Azam.age. 70 years, occupatonEngineer nid'Fti( ruo.io1. AdivaGardenia,Apari.ments.Road No 5 Banjara Hills, tjua"raoaO throuoh his GP Aholder KRamdasGoud, age 68 years' -ausiiess R/o H No 6-1-155t102, Sai Rukmini Apartments' ;;;;i6; Paddrarao Nagar. Secunderabad
...'ET.T.ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedin the affidavrt filed therewith,the Highcourt may be pleased to issue an order,directionor wnt more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe inactionof the respondentno 6 in causing Survey ofland admeasuring Ac1 - 30cts in Sy No' 44lAA,Ac' 1-07Gtsin Sy.No.4S/AAandAc,l-25GtsinSyNo.51/AAofKokapetVillage.Gandipet Manal in RangareddyDistrict as illegal. arbitraryand consequentlydirect the of land of Petitionerin in Sy No'44/AA' 45/AA respondent no.5 to ""rru.uiruy and 51/AA ofKokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal in Rangareddy District
IANOi 1OF2023
Petition under'Section151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated inthe.affidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto direct the respondentno.5 to cause survey of in Sy No 44lAA,45lAAand 51/AA
of KokapetVillage,G rndipet Mandalin Rangareddy Distrrctpe rding disposal of the Wntl)etition
Counsel for thePetiti )ner: SRl. VENUGOPALA RAOPASNOOtItI Counsel for theResp)ndentsNo.1tos:GP FORREVENUE
Counsel for theResp )ndentsNo.6: NoneAppeared The Court madethe I rllowing:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR UIRIT PETITIO NNo .3062 0F 20.23
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand closed.
SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANIREGISTRAR /TTRUECOPY/' sEc#N oFFlcER
To,
BM
BS o -l-
HIGH COURT
DATEID:2310212023
ORDI=R
WP.ltlo.3062 <f 2023
.1Ylir
S l,i 14:
: il'
1,:)
-
B riAn 2023
. J,
rr t - 1 ..;
'-'..1 '-i:.-:-.-_--.,; ' .i: .. ': 'l -:..''
CLOTSING TH r WRIT PETITION WITIHOUT C0STS
6
Bgh
aL.al"z
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the F-Line application submitted by the petitioner was rejected due to a dispute regarding possession and title.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Nusavr Azam
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
Range Reddy
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar
Mumminen Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
