The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a scholarship and demands for school fees as infructuous, noting that the cause in the petition did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABA,D (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 30271 OF 2011
Between:
Master Ambothu Ritesh, S/o A.Jayaram, Occ: Student, Rep. by his father Natural Guardian-A.Jayaram, S/o Biksha aged 34 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Kamathur h/o Tghammaipalli, Vanguru mandal, [Vlahabubnagar District.
..,PETITIONER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF N/ANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent No.2 in canceling the scholarship to the petitioner from ihe academic years 2009-10 , 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 vide proceedings No.J2l3860/2010 dated 30-11-2010 and demanding to pay the fees by the respondent No.3 immediately and G.O.Ms.No.144, Social Welfare (Q2) Department dated 12-12-1996, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional violative of Article 14, 15,21 R/VV 46 of Constitution of lndia and set aside the same and contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to 3 to allow the petitioner to continue his studies with Respondent No.3 school till the completion of 12th class without demanding the fees.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 37501 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the impugned order videproceedings No.J2l3860/2010 dated 30-11-2010 of the 2nd respondent and the consequential letters of Respondent No.3 vide letters dated 28.01 .2011 and 22.09.201 1 for the academicyears 2009-10, 20102011 and 2O11-2012 respectively pending disposal of the main WP.
l.A. NO:'l OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 25033 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased direct the respondents to allow thepetitioner to attend the classes andprosecute the studies till the completion of the 12th class without insisting for payment of school fee pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. P VENKATASWAMY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRl. AGARTYA RAM REP. FOR SRl. SARANG AFZULPURKAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.3O271 OF 2OL1
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Agartya Ram learned counsel, representing on behalf of Sarang Afzulpurkar appearing on behalf of 3.d respondent submits that the cause in the writpetition does not survive and a request is made to close the writpetition.
Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order asto costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ
petition, sha1l stand closed.
SD/.P. CH, NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/
To,
//TRUE COPY// 'I SECTION OFFICER
kar
SW
lll.s.
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210212023
,/t
H
Natr. +.t:
et:
7.P a
I C6
3 F-
.1..
.) 1/
ORDER
WP.No.30271 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS
?C"f,i)
*1;Ll"=.
Master Ambothu Ritesh
State Government of AP
Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad Public School
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
