came to the knowledge of the authorities, they have reduced the basic pay of the petitioner aide order dated 09.07.1993. The learned Standing Counsel has stated that the said order has not been challenged by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner cannot challenge the impugned orders, which are only consequential orders. The learned Standing Counsel has also stated that challenging the order dated 17.08.1993, the petitioner has filed W.P.No.12480 ol 7993. As the petitioner had withdrawn the said W.P.No.124B0 of 1993, the order dated 17.08.1993 regarding reversion of the upgraded pay scale of the petitioner was implemented. Further, it is stated that the Central Govemment had introduced a new Scheme called as Assured Career progression (ASP) Scheme which envisages grant of two financial upgradatioru to Group B, D, C employees on completion of 12 and 24 years ol regular service. The petitioner belongs to Group,C. That the contention of the petitioner that he was drawing pay of Rs.g,7O1/_ in the scale of Rs.6,500-200-10,500/- is absolutely false statement The orders relied upon by the petitioner showing the upgraded pay as Rs.8,700/- is only on the basis of the interim orders granted by this Court in W.P.No.12480 of 1993. Once the petitioner has
