Dismissed

Anagandula Manjula v. The State of Telangana and 9 others

Telangana HC28 Feb 2023WP/29132/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging the land acquisition process and sought liberty to file a fresh petition. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Anagandula Manjula Vs The State of Telangana and 9 others — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶7

WRIT PETITION No :29132 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Anagandula.M-anjula,-S/o Narsimha Reddy @ Bapi Reddy, aged about 50 y9ar9, FUo H.No.3-62, Reddygudem Village, S.S. Tadvai- Maidat, Mulugu District, (Erstwhile Warangal District).

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 . The state of relangana, Rep. by its^principal secretary, Revenue Deoartment -^{(LA),-Secretariat Building,Secretariat, Hyderabad.}

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rep, by ils^prin6ipal Secretary, Tourism and Culture

¶14

^^{p.epartment,Secretatiat Building,Secretaiiat,Hyderatiad.}

¶15

The Commissioner, Telangana Tourism and Culture Department, Hvderabad. 4. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderbbad.

¶16

The Managing Director, Telangana state Tourism tievelopment corporation Tourism House No.3-5-891, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad:S00 029.^'

¶17

The Project.Officer, lntegrated Tribal Developm6nt Agency, Eturu Nagara, Waranagal, Warangal District.

¶18

The District Collector, Muluqu District, (Erstwhile Waranoal District).

¶19

The Schedule Tribe Development, Touiism and Culture,-O/o Rooni No.26O,

¶20

^{Firstfloor, D-Block,Telangana, Secretary. Hyderabad.}

¶21

The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Lanri-Aciqulsition Officer, Mulugu

¶22

_ ^ 9jri.tol,^{Mr/lugg District. (Erstwhile Warangatbistrtct;.} 10.The Tahsildar, Samakka Sarakka Tadvai Mt-andal, Muiugu District, (Erstwhile Warangal District).

¶23

...RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents non-considering the representation of the petitioner, non-initiating to grant the compensation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the land in Sy.No100/1 to an extent of Ac.4.30 gts and the land in Sy.No.19OiA to an extent of Ac.2.00 gts total an extent of

¶25

-.1

¶26

Ac.6.30^gts situated at^{Reddygudem Village, S.S. Tadvai Mardtt} ,^{MuluguDistrict,} (Erstwhile Warangal Di ;trict),^{without issuingany acquisillon} [)r^{(),:;ee(j inqs, without} issued any notice to^{th ? petitioner and without following the dlr,r processof law,} under the Provisrons rf^{Right to Fair Compensationand TretnsfrarencyLand} Acquisition, Rehabilitati rr^{and ResettlementAct,20 13, is highly illegal. arbitrary,} unconstitutional, unjust^{arrd in violationof Principlesof Nirtural Jt.stice and also in} violation of Articles 14,^{1!| (1) (g), 21 and 300-A of the ConstirLti,:rn of India, apart} from violation of Right^{1c Fair Compensationand Transparenr)t'L-anriAcquisition,} Rehabilitation and^{Re ;ettlementAct, 2013 andconsequently direct the gth} respondent to^{considrrr the representationof the petitiort-'t', to grant the} compensation on^{thela rd of the petitionerin respectof the lancl in Sy.tio100/1to} an extent of^{Ac.4.30 gtr; and the land in Sy.No.190/Ato an exr:trtof Ac.2.00 gts} total an extent of^{Ac. ).:10 gts situatedat ReddygudemVil a1;e, S.S. Tadvai} Mandal, Mulugu^{Distric t, (Erstwhile Warangal District) underi lte lrrovisions of} Right to Fair Conrpens^{ation and TransparencyLand A<;quisitit>r, Rehabilitation} and Resettlement^{Act, 211 3.}

¶27

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶28

Petition under^{Se ltion1 51 CPC praying thatin the circttrrstances statedin} the affidavit filed in^{supp ort of the petition, the High Court tnay c: pleased to direct} the respondents to^{cotrsiderthe representationof the petitic'ttr-'r,to grant the} compensation on the^{latrdof the petitionerin respectof the lanrlin Sy.No100/1to} an extent of Ac.4.ll0^{gtt and the land in Sy.No.190/Ato an exterrt or Ac.2.00 gts} total an extent of^{Ac.(i.:;0 gts situatedat ReddygudemVillage,S.S. Tadvai} Mandal, Mulugu Distric,^{(ErstwhileWarangal District) under tl-re Provisions of} Right to Fair Conrpens^{rtion and TransparencyLand Acquisition, Rehabilitation} and Resettlement Act,^{2,)l 3 pending disposalof the writ petition.}

¶29

Counsel for the Petitiorer: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respordr:nt Nos.1,7,9 & 10: GP FOR LAND AC;t191511191, Counsel for the Respor dent Nos.2,3 & 5: SRI M.ROOPENDEFI, SC FOR TGTDC Counsel for the Respordent No.4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respor dent Nos.6 & 8: GP^FOR SOCIAL WEI-I:ARE

¶30

The Court made the^{follrwing:ORDER}

¶31

¶32

¶33

TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

WRIT PETITION No.29132 of 2O2l

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter, dated 27.02.2023 in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to hle a fresh writ petition.

¶37

Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as sought for by the petitioner.

¶38

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition

¶39

shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶40

SD/-K. SREERAMA MURTHY ASS!STANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (,i SEcfIUN oFFtcER

¶41

¶42

Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACeUlStTtON, High Court for the State of Telan-gana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶43

Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI

¶44

Two CCs to GP FOR SOCTAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telan_gana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶45

9n" 9g^{to sRt tV.RoopEr\iDER; SC FOR} TGTDC IOPUCI 5. 9ne Q9^{to SRt RApoLUBHASKAR,} euvocaie foetttl-^-'

¶46

Two CD Copies

PSK.

HIGH COURT

DATED:2810212023

ORDER

WP.No.29132 <tf 2021

..71' i i'. S 1'r1
ji.
- )'
/,,
't
n l', 'rl
t U

¶54

DISMISSING TIIE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAV/N WITHOUT COSTS.

Anagandula Manjula v. The State of Telangana and 9 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anagandula Manjula v. The State of Telangana and 9 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravinder Vs State of Telangana and 2 others

Smt. Thangallapalli Raju Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Manthena Dayakar Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Agile Security Force Private Limited And Another Vs The Superintendent And 2 Others

M/s S.S. Consultancy Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Balkan Sailu Yadav Vs The state of Telangan