Permitting the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition against a commercial tax dispute. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[337s 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJ,
WRIT P TITIO NO: 28541 oF 2019
Between:
Jalavihar Entertainm.ent qW. _Lld, Necklace Road, Hyderabad _ S00 063 Represented bv its Mana gins_oiie'ctoi sii Nly .rgr; n;];, Hril r_atJ"n'pp" r, Raju, Aged about s7 vea"rs,"nvo.Froi r.ri'.'ib,_rraLe iiJivr ' p"a;r.il' r 6"yrtri Hi[s, Road No. 10-c,jubib6 Hi[s, nyit"ii'ora,soo133.- . .. vv,v,,,v,
AND
...PETIT|oNER
Petition under Articre 226 or the constitution of rndia ,;rTi?t?L'fit'[: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particurarry a writ in the nature of Mandamus, decraring the action of Respondent No. 6 in directing the Petitioner to pay soo/o of the disputed tax vide ACo No. 50s/2019 dated 22-11-2019 being arbitrary, illegal and unjust and set aside the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of collection of disputed tax raised pursuant to the assessment order vide A.O. No. 32853 dated 20-05-2019passed by the 5th Respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J.N. BHUSHAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 3 to 8: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR TOURISM
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEN. TUKARAMJI
Writ Petition No.28541 of2019
ORDER: (Per Sri JusticeP. Sam Koshy)
Mr. J.N.Bhushan, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, submits that the parties have enteredinto a onetime settlement and accordingly, the petitioner does not want topursue themafter anymore against the respondents and hehas filed a memo dated30-06-2023seeking permission to withdraw the writpetition.
Permission is accordedand the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No orderas to costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if anypending in this writ petition, shall
stand dismissed.
SD/- T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR L;19 SECTION OFFICER
/ffRUE COPY//
It
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710712023
ORDER
WP.No.28541 of 2019
I r1a' stAil-
/( or"
2r [uBflm
.5
* _t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
v,g
Jalavihar Entertainment P. Ltd.
State of Telangana
P. SAM KOSHY
N. TUKARAMJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
