The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging a government order regarding land settlement. The court held that the cause for the writ did not survive as the Commissioner disposed of the underlying appeal while the writ was pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33031
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27s49 OF 2007
Between:
Nalluri Ramakrishna, S/o.Late Pasalu, Cultivation, R/o Kothuru Village, H/o Chinamidisileru (V), Cherla (M), Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in'tle circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus, declaring the G.O.Rt.No.2004 Revenue (SS.l) Department dated 13-12-2004 in so far as the settlement part is concerned as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without any authority lf law, violative of principles of natural justice, against the provisions of A.P.Scheduled Areas Ryotwari Settlement Regulation 211970 and the rules made thereunder.
i.A.NO:1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 36028 OF 2007
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the G.O.Rt.No.2004 Revenue (SS.l) Department dt.'1312-2004 in so far as Settlement part is concerned and issue consequential directions to the 2nd respondent to entertain the appeal without insisting upon payment of user charges pending the disposal of the writ petition in the interest ofjustice.
Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI.KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
H(. N'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS ,I.,{O
U,RIT PETITION No.27549 OF 2OO7
ORDER:
V/hen t re matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K. Jagzrdeshu'ar I :arnecl counsel rcpresenting Sri Ko'rI urtL Vinerya Kumar, lear t:C counsel for the petitioner lairly sr.Lbrrrits that cluring the p, ndency of the writ petition, the Comrri:;sicner and Directo- o1- :l ]1 .lcments, Hl,derabad, T.S. disp,osecl c,] th(t appeal try its ordcr ' idc J)nrgs.No. A.P.No.2/2012/D, dated )1.O9.2022.
Irr vle; r>f the same, cause in the writ petir.i()n cloes not survive Ar: --ordingly, the writ petition is ck,sed. {)opy of the order, c ated 2 +.9.2022 is placed on record.
IVliscell rrreous petitions, if any, pending irr this writ ,petition, sha | :rtancl closed.
t;D/- Gi. SIREESHA ASSIS't'AUTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/' ,ii:#,]* oFFrcER
To
1 TwoCCstoGP:c)RREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStatec('[elanganaat Hvderabad [OLlr] 2. ciii-cCiJ s'nr.t owrunuPAVAN KUMAR,Advocate[oF'llc] 3. Two CD Copies
S.A GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:12104,,2023
ORDER
WP.No.27549 ot 2007
/-=::::':-_<br>ft-: sl ' ;6'
(
tl
(j,-) t 3 iq{ ?st
,j),
" /r,
2
.i'
CLOSING THI: W.P
WITHOUT CCISTS.
( n
11v Irl
Nalluri Ramakrishna
Government of A.P..
The Special Commissioner & Director of Settlements, Government of A.P.
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
