Writ petition filed against high police officials for inaction on complaints and demand for police protection. Petitioner sought writ of mandamus declaring the inaction illegal and directing action/protection. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HI G H co u Rr'?+ ITffJilir:: -":.^- "^-^ J urisdiction) tspecii'r'ciiisinal
'HiB#"1,8'^,15'x,3Jfis,f,??"??'J
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEC'V' BHASKARREDDY TroNNO :26337OF2023 wRITPETI
Between:
Petitionunder Article226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiledtherewith' the High Courtmay be pleasedtoissueawrit,orderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofwrit of lr/andamus,decraring the action of the respondents3 to 5 in not taking any actionon the 6th respondent on the complaints made by the petitionerdated 06.09.2023,as highly illegaland arbitraryand in violationof principles of natural justice, apartfrom viotation of Articles 21 and 300-Aof the Constitutionof lndia' and consequentlydirect the respondents3 to 5 to take action against the 6th
respondent on the complaints made by th e petil. Ire{rlroner dated 0609'2o23, by providing Police Protection to ihp;^;;.^^]- , , re specti ve,y, "0,",.,,ini :ff ::. ;:1'j::::'f .:; Xl I Jr.rl-r,,11,1"j.,l m ea ncnavat, o",,".nu., Mandar, sanga Reddy :ililffii ;,::.1T:,:f:
IA NO:1 oF2023
petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in of the petition, the Hish court mav be preased to direct ,.|':il:;:ll"J I;Ti:" the 6rh ,espondent on the compraints made by ,ri'ff"#:rt #';ffist Protection to the petitioners, ptots bearing r"r rurl'jrr,lJ;r::[.t#;: admeasuring S00 Sq.yards each, in Sy.No..1CrO7, situated at Beeramguda in Ameenpur Gram panchayat, patancheru [\ilandal, Sanga Reddy District.
Counsel for the petitioners: SRI SRIKANTH SUI ARt
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: NONE APPARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
a
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 26337 of 2o23
ORDER:
Sri R.Prasad, Iearned counsel representing Sri Srikant Sutari, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this
writ petition
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
As a seqdel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANILEEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// QD SECTION OFFIGER
\
To,
1 One CC to Sri Srikanth Sutari, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, At
Hyderabad [OUT]
3 Two CD Copies
TJ GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311012023
ORDER
WP.No.26337 of 2023
..- -t : -. *-.
.. I;,.r,.-.I,.,
:Ca
tr
I
11 st'1 ?m
)
!,
I
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS.
(,
l) ;[D>]
The petitioner(s)
Government of Telangana
Director, Anayutostof
Superintendent of Police
Deputy Superintendent of Police
Station House Officer
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
