Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar permitted the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 2597 of 2023, challenging the third respondent's notice to freeze the petitioner's bank account, and dismissed the petition accordingly without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s61
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 2597 OF 2023
Between:
Bezawada Venkateswarlu, S/o. B.Kotaiah, Aged 45years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Pruthvi Mansion, Flat No.208, Badamgalli lane. Domalguda, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any _other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing a notice Sub/Case NCRP675/2022, dated 27.12.2022 to the 2nd respondent directing the 2nd respondent to seize the petitioner's savings bank SB Account No.05451050089941 , HDFC Bank with the 2nd respondent bank asillegal, arbitrary and withoutjurisdiction and set aside the same and further direct the 2nd respondentiopermit thepetitioner to operate his savings bank SBAccount No.05451050089941 , HDFC Bank.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumslancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to
granl interim suspension of th€. notice Sub/Case NCRP675/2022, dated 27.12.2022 issued by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent directing the 2nd respondent to freeze the account, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. S.HEMALATHA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
(Dy. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF IND|A)
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N. CHANDRADHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
; I
THEIION'BLE SRI WSTICE IIUMMIilENI SUDHEERKUMAR WRITPETITIONNo.2597 of2o23
qp='ER3
.Learned counsel for the pet-itionerseeks permissionof this
Courtto withdraw thc Writ Petition'
IS dismissed S 3. AccordinglY,the WritPetition
wi[hdrawn.There shall be no order as to costs'
Miscellaneouspetitions,ifany,pendinginthiswritpetltlol-I
sli:t1lsta nd closecl
SD'.N.SRIHARI
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
lcERER SECTI
/ITRUECOPY//
/ITRUECOPY// lcERER ' r. mtt3[t*-,mi'i'-{',urlflHt#tiflt"";::SECTI
-' ivJerabad [oUTl s. fwoCD CoPies'
t*d'-BSK
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910612023
g STATE OA
-/
TM {,
i t $ 'I\It iI
ORDER
WP.No.2597 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
a5 @ -d* TAPr -tD 1)
Bezawada Venkateswarlu
Union of India
HDFC Bank
Cyber crime Police station
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
