Writ petition challenging an employer's punishment order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition if required.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition if relief is not granted by alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2sss3 oF 2021
Between:
G Bhakshi Naik, S/o Late G Pool.Singf N.a^,k Aged about 39 years, Stores Officer D and T, Zonal Work Shop, Karimnagar, R/o.H.No.10-2 -B2Ot1, vtdya na!1ar, fiarlmnag;i.- - -'-
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Arlicre 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action taken by respondents as illegal arbitrary, set aside the same and grant relief to the petitioner in the interest of justice and fair play.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PAVAN KUMAR A.B.L.N.
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 : SRI A.RAV| BABU
The Court made the following ORDER
\
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JI'STICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.25553 of 2O2l
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner address,:d a letter to the
Registry dated 03.11.2023 stating as under:
"I humbly submit that petitioner G. Bhakshi Naik. u_thile tuorking fledWrit PetitionNo.25553of 202 1, before this Hon'ble High Court challenging the punishment order imposed bg tlrc respondents.
Notu, the petitioner submits o letter dated 03.1 ).2023 requesting foru-tithdrautlof utit petition ftledbg him and he uants to purue the ntatter uith respondent bg wag of appeal and reuision _frtrther. The letter is enclosed hereu.tith.
It is prayed tlnt, this Hon'ble Court maA pemir the petitioner to u-tithdra ut the case uith a liberty to file fresh writ petitiott i.n case relief is not granted in the alternatiue remedg in the interest o.,F lustice and for issue of necessary orders."
rvith liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order ari Lo costs
Miscellaneous applications, if . aly pendir-rg, shall also
stand closed.
SD/-P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Ni1" SECTION OFFICER
To
1 TwoCCstoGPFORROADSANDBUILDINGS,HighCourtlort"leStateof Telanoana atHyderabad. [OUT'I 2 o;;'ic'i; 5;iil;;;;-K,-rtA 6 L.N , AdvocateloPucl 3 One CC to SriA.RaviBabu, Advocate[OPUC] 4 Two CD CoPies SA
SB
-\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511112023
ORDER
1 e STAT€ o.A
4
s 6 0Et 2t11 a
*"'.
\rr
l o ! p r'. \ (',\ \Y-!_
,'
WP.No.2S553 of 2O21
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITIIOUT COSTS.
I( w>
G BHAKSHI NAIK
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRANSPORT
P. MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
