The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to contest disqualification in a police constable selection process. The court held the petition was infructuous and struck it off.
N/A
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO: 23853 OF 2017
Between:
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioners in physicat measurements test in the selection of Police constables as per notification in Rc.No. 151/Rect./Admn.1l2O15 dated 31-12-2015, even though they are qualified as illegal, arbitrary and violative ofprinciples of naturaljustice,
consequently direct the respondents to conduct final written examination to the petitioners by considering the physical measurements test conducted on 30-1 1- 2016 for consideration of their candidature for the selection of Police constables as per notification in Rc.No. 151/Rect./Adm n.112015 dated 31-12-20'15
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. HYDER ALI REP SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES l/ cP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO. 23853 OF 2OI7
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up forhearing, Sri Hyder Ali, learned counsel representinglearned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and th€ matter has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this writpetition, shall stand closed.
SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR //rRUE COPY//ASSlStff*tCtSrnan /
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. One CC to SRl. SREENIVASA RAO VEL|VELA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies BM GJP \v
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811112023
ORDER
WP.No.23853 of 2017
I E STA Te
(
t v
L'
o 2 I N0\i 2tz3 i:. ^t' ,
-o
.l f)fS:rrf C<br>
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
)b
Kommu Ashok and Others
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
